V A R I iE L E C T I O N ES
Pag. 207. E. 8. emendauimus pro au&oritatem Hunfr. feeucuti,
qui nebulam vertir.
Pag. i}6 . A .4 . In Cod. Reg. legcbatur^j^'^s’s/j^TijiWffii'it.ßJMij, pro quo
reponendumcenfuimus pufixtjs-
Pag. a73. D. 3. xj /ui\pKsfl> xyipdv df •mi kjct’ Ate^cdSf^ijJ legpts STiAfiv
S7n^V‘0,T?'n > Deerant hsec in verfione Hunfredi, qua: tarnen ad hiftoriam
temporis quo fcriptafunt pertinent.
Pag. 177. D. i.t?n/A&oini. Aliter legit Hunfr. aut perperam cft immittit,
pro fuccenfuit.
Pag. z8z. B. 7. Lacunam ex Cod. Vaticano itafupple:&id«fd/j W 4%»y>rfW »»•
Qlcuityntrdp.
Pag. Z84.B. Hunfred.NomuscontraNomum. Eft emm wpjt,
piasfedtura. In Edit. LXX. dfjzs'Qn n^st, Lex in Legem.
Pag.188. A.j. Lacunahicrclióta eft, tametfi in Vatic* & Reg. códicibus
nullarcperitur.
Ibid. A . 3. -fVdi -ms Tt/Utiiai Vfa/b8yiKd 'Hunfred. vertit rerum Ecclefiaftica-
l'um curatores.nos delubrorum feu rerum qux ad delubra pertinent curatores,
meo iudicio, aliquanto melius.
Pag. 15z. A .8 .03U10 so»i^wri^j'ntx^'aA^atwntots.Hunfred. quseDeum
vidorcmolim Auguftum habet ,vertcrat, nullo fenfu, cum in Grxco nulla fit
Auguftimentio.
Pag. 309. D. 4. (niola^ttcnvconieifturaduifti fcripfimus, cum in reg. cod.le-
gatur m&ja.o]u.a.cii.
Pag. 333^0. z. 2^31 Si ye n o’i'icv tUu pwsVcluj éJAsytai’dszwStiAsid', <c ths
■nu5uin«{ , tutc*mt)<d y J a /s c /x x \t\< n a j)S tijia fz tfa - Qu* fic verti
debuerunt: Pervirium autcm myfticam Eulogiam & inciuenti facrificij rao-
dumfignificat, quod in fan&is Eccleliisfoliti fumusadimplcre.
Ibid. E. 1. yd pupa jcJ? -ra» \&g)> pszAupz TV dyiou ßeL^lapifns, avp-
Gofovn/utfete£7iczyou7ni6J(jutTtf'&wjt(7pzci,Tnt<ivfjS/)oi. Qu* verbaita vertes: vn-
gimur cnim vnguento tempore prafertim fan&i baptifmatis ■, ohrifma fta-
tuentes fignum ac fymbolum participationis fan£ti Spiritus. Idem infra lib. v.
pag.9i7.adh*cEfai*verba:^)(jt^iAs['v[*isV<üJ5i<<!7)^M~it, vs8««, inquit, <Tiw
tir dXais tnutfur ds yï> l TlauZaf SpHfir, irxpyiajzizS•jrv&jfza.'A -ms ‘dsnAutfclnas, (c
’rqs&nty'miXfdlJ'x.a/pJitqfctilf&fQaSi* Xezsss dyim mbpjtvns. vide
fragmentain Ioannem pag. 683. vbi mentionem facit chrifmatis nstTD^j»t««&
tiA ^doeas.
Pag. 361. B. 4. Dccem qui fcquen tur verfus ab his.vcrbis »wra n? A^, vfquc ad
ei\iyrm in verfione Hunfredi non reperies.
Pag. 367. Qu* fequuntur ab his verbis, 3 mfiï <wtd>, ad illa, Kvffre dt 0a/-
4d deerant in verfione Hunfred.
Pag. 614. C. i. cZt^tïé/XTn&ioifTui AIJio7netf tiü:T£sii> oh ^n^ajuv yy perperam
Hunfred.interpretatuserat,apudnegotiatorcs jEthiop. quzcunquc funt in
-^gypto.Sicenimprarcedcntipagina,D.fi.e/twpet«. Al^otmt, ndtsiv, «j 0 k-
Cctfap '/röAtjV.
Pag.678. B. 4. Hunfred. ad marginem fcripfcrat tuint, dubitans num
legendum effet yjpim: fed nullus conieótura: locus, immo rctinendaleótio.
CaBoncsenim diccbanturin operibus cuiufcumque materi* extantlaa reli-
qua fuperficie ornamenta, qua: quidem producercntur in modum rcgulse.
IN E S A I AM.
Quod notauit Cafaubon. ad Athen. lib. v. cap. 7.
Pag. 708. D. 3. Lacuna quae hic cernitur in duobus Codicibus Vatic, eadem
repcrtaeft. Quod notauit virintegerrim* fidei, & fingularisdiligcnti* Fran-
cifcus Gotzadinus Siphnius qui nobis hos libros e Vatic, cgregie defcrip-
fit.
Pag. 746. B. a. Sequuntur in Vatic.Cod. Scholia duo, quorum 1. fic habct:
Qn o , 'Y7ttP\g./AfGfyjov cunzz 0i tgF ^yAa rta^VTlAa/^oy cscSiTtz
■yjzfy' cLjuff-n/A^ x W £ s , W JlKSH ^»"4' tlxthii ■?!*.*/u/xidnffi.
tfs pisw du-nt iVo vjiyjvpyit c! hvS’Ojm tn&ffihaa&p, mnigyit dm! SH-fo vjtTg.-
fx.4pd.irti) 3«vAs^uci. 3 iwtHfM 3 olytot 2^4 n tn?&<prmv JiSdnx<t , oil <unif
iifaufzcLTicdx lai dpSp-Tlcli v \$ !, tyj % Q-
'IVni tm! 3^C/! rW eg««. 7ra^i* yyf,<pxmi, tipluns n(Sp!eV d n it, W /ud-
Ae?n «W tiptis Uyi/U)fi. y^f ontf 0 ecd, art Ssj dres, m/hlof,
xdi Ti/twelaz «cpeiAs^V > IsurVK «fztif fAp CV* fwdf Si '(gd-dui
•drzyi/zeive Q>™ o xrtfnoy.
Alterum his verbis h'j3 ti els Jarctw, fubiicitur, cum hoc titulo.'^Aw. Ezufe-
vny dm! tz! op&ia'%gy.7r4jcru) 3 ofxsiov, yjp, 2^$’ rrzCjGduv iUu cdo,-
itstArOTKaSaj riXctilui.' ^ rarcJGa.mi cxx, els rzi^yGcLm /Utr^.G\>i%}s , Ordi ^j -kUu
dsatfMim r Gddi tvs olxtictf euoiitt cM,qns , $M,d n isrC^Gditu -thu ftspds ci-
SvmiApcs . as rmCjGcivt r(s"^fotui , yj] tep!oii efyieiv, yj] 'PsrZf Trfyiis >4:^ rarO-
wtiffin, 3voicc, ov% tzvrzds 4e o ns , xjy oxpdLyvs Ofxs! xzvgq.S i/j.vy.yj4-jt.
“VA £3t ©eos Id xd\ dtrS^ym;, tv Jr trd/Mtvs fTpaL-flo/sSjiiov dmSxs epeiret U %U
(funs , aiciftyjas « Jtcmims Hmjas xsi vf nsrCyGdnu itw trqa.y4u) , yq n dfZfo! U-
/Mt 'CzveSijt'e -Alu xouey.r. oJ yZy>' fdm Cj)Hn> earpdyn , Hzzd \dj dfnxtl^m. xjj
3 tnv JdicL-m djzs-ifJAiiev, as Si Gets {d v , xdi dmjxs /sS/iat tit tv fdpst
rfs mi»i this xuryuni 'eSuxtt Subeft infcriptio , Ep/zlwe'ut. deinde , e/xipjpie
a<V > &c.+ Quad fcholia defunt in verfione Hunfred. vtrum vero alicunde
in textuim irrepferint, nefcio, cum in his commentariis nufpiam fcholia
iftiufmodi cernantur. Ea ne perperam omifla quis expoftulet, hic reprx-
fentamus integra.
Pag. 7^3.0. y. el Se 01 Qouvot ov Edit. LXX. ot Qouuci feu.
Ibid. 8. (Mjy ou fxi lO^tjaAv Edit. LXX. cm v put (iffy.?).
Pag. 769. B. 4. JieA&jfgrfa)avi Edit. LXX. ftff^feA4jtniV7ai.
Pag. 770. C. 1. mi^a LXX, ex7lm. Ibid. 1. cx.4!os e\s ify.- £14.
LXX. <rxdba.voV.
Pag. 771. B. 7. mere Edit. LXX. spdyrre.
Pag. 781. E. 1. aziu-n\esi Edit. LXX. TtAsoS?.
Pag. 787.B.3. djitctt/za.LXX.dJixj!..
Pag. 788. C. 10. Xffaxw LXX. Xfildia.
Pag. 8oz. E.y. xdi dvnq>e-^as. Defunt hxc verba in ed. LXX.
Pag. 810. A. 10. Cr.ifpUutwLXX.s7t*ehUxjtj.
Pag. 8l£. B, /,'nfiKM^s LXX. miKfni. -A
Pag, 819. D. J. '^TBffVV Edit. L,XX.‘^>TWCS0 7VS'lv%IS<rOV.
Pag. 831.C. 4. Verbisiftis a.v’dmJv LXX. addunt, w cu pd d&is
Slxy)ffuue. '
Pag. 836. C. y. ? defideratur in Edit LXX.
Pag.838. A.i.epstdht Edit. LXX.luly0 or!a Ibid.LXX.e!s<SfJpfccvu, i£pn
0x.te.7rz ooo'ftsofA/t'nSGVv, yj] oxui! sips^Aesd!tzcrippaiis ffv.
Tom. II. 2 ij