4
' î '
'if
I. A n tro p lm im plantagineum. Ka u lf. /3. Lessoni.— A. Lessoni. B o ry in Dnperrey Voy.
p . 255. t. 2 8 . / 2.— A. phmtagiueum. Blume Fl. Jav. t. 30.
Ouv phuit is oxaetiy the A . plantaginettm %iii*ed by Blume, ;md equally the A . L e sm ii of Diipevrey’s
Voj-age. Nor does the A. Durvillci appem- to us to bo really distinct from it, according to Boiy’s description.
1. Notochlmna pilosa ; iVondibus ovato-hmceolatis bi-ti-ipiunatis, pinnulis oblongis renio-
tiusciilis subtus nuu'ginoque recurvo p ræcipue cum rachibus stipiteque nitidissimo glandidoso-
pilcAsis,
This is allied to the N . distans of Mr. Brown, but has a broader frond, more lax pinnules, u'liich are quite
destitute of the paleaceous set® so copious in the former, and spariugly clothed instead n-itli somewhat glandular
hairs.
1. Xipholx)lus macrocorpus; frondibus lineari-lanceolatis obtusis inferne in stipitem longi-
usculum attenuatis subtus incanis, soris serialibus ellipticis magnis prominentibus. ( T a b .
X V H I .)
Cctudex lougus, repens, magnitudine penuæ ixnrinse, adpressim squaraosus, hie illic fibrosus; squamis lan-
ceolato-subulatis fuscis, maigiue fimbriatis. Stipites bi-tripollicai-es, glabri, versus basin articulati, infra arti-
culum dense imbricatim sqmuuosi. Frondes palm-oi-es, liueari-lanceolat«, obtus®, coriace®, supra areolis (soris
oppositis) oblongis depressis, ubique squamulis minutis stellatim pilosis obsit®, demiun superne imd®, inferno
semper incan®,iuaigme leviter recurv®. Costa subtus prominens. Sori magni, ellipHci, fiisci, valde promiueutes,
in unam seriem infra costam et mivigmem dispositi, totara dimidiam et superiorem partem froudis occupantes.
Tab. XVIII. Niphobolus macrocarpus. Fig. 1, Capsxdes; f g . 2, Scales from the frond:—magnified.
1. Polj-podium pkymatodes. L in n .
2. Polj-podium alternifilium. Willd. Sp. PI. v. 5. p . 168? B o ry in Duperrey Voy. v. 1.
p . 261.
3. Poh-podium latifolium. “ Forst. Prodr. n. 457.” Schkuhr, Fil. t. 24.
1. Nephrodium B r .—Aspidium exaltatum. Willd.
2. Nephrodium propinquum. B r . Prodr. Fl. Nov. Holl. p . 148. B o ry in Duperrey Voy.
V . p . 269.— Aspidium tmitum. Sw .? Schkukr, Fil. t. 33. b .
3. Nephrodium nymphale.— Poh-podium n\-mphale. “ Forst. Prodr. n. 442.” Sckkuhr,
Fil. t. 34.— Aspidium patens. Sw.— A. moUe. Sw. ?
1. Asplénium Nid u s. L in n .
2. Asplénium obtusatum. “ Forst. Prodr. n. 430.”—Labill. Nov. Holl. v. 2. p . 93. t. 242.
/ 2. var. minor, (et A. obliquum. Labill. Nov. Holl. v. 2. p . 93. t. 242. / I .) fid e B r . in
Prodr. F l. Nov. Holl. p . 150.
3. Asplénium tenerum. Forst. Prodr. n. 431.” Sw. Syn. Fil. p . 78. et 266. Schkuhr,
F il. t. 69.
1. Diplazium arborescens. Swartz, Syn. Fil. p . 92. Willd. Sp. PI. p . 354. Bory in D u perrey
Voy. V . l . p . 271.
We have seen no authentic specimen of D. arboreum; but our plant accords sufficiently with the
description- We have received what we consider the same species from St. Vincent in the West Indies, and
have doubted if it might not be a more than usually branched state of Asplénium ambiguum.
1. Doodia Kunthiana. Gaud, in Freyc. Voy. Bot. p . 401. t. 14.
Although this entirely agrees ndth the plant above quoted, we are yet unable to decide if it be really
distmct from the Doodia caudata of Mr. Brown. The terminal pinnae can indeed scarcely be said to be
5 ■ 't
' , li
; i
t I
'I I
‘ ! j