■f! ,l>
O r d . X L V I . H Y D R O P H Y L L E ® . B r .
1. PHACELIA. Micliaux.
1. P . circinnata; foliis pinnatis ternatis hispidis rugosis lineatis, spicis glomeratis se-
cundis hispidissimis. Spr.—Jacq. in Spr. Syst. Veget. v. 1. p . 584. Cham, in Schlecht. v. 4.
p . 493.— Hydrophyllum magellanicum. L am .—Helio tro p ium pinnatum. Vahl.
H ab, Conception.—Specimens which we have received from Mr. Cruckshanks, Mr. Macrae, and Mr.
Bridges, gathered in tho more northern parts of Chili, seera to be identical with tbe P. peruviana, Spr.,
(Aldea pinnata, Ruiz and Pavon,) if, indeed, that species be really distinct from P . circinnata.
O r d . X L V I I. S C R O P P IU L A R IN E ® . B r .
1. VERONICA. Linn.
1. V. acinifolia. Lin n .
tlvB. Conception.—It differs from the Europiean plant of that name, only in the capsule being scarcely
so deeply notched at tbe apex.
2. SCHIZANTHUS. R u iz ^ Pav.
1. S. pinnatus. R u iz e tP a v. Fl. Per. v. 1. p . 13. t. 17. Exot. Fl. t. 73. Bot. Mag. t. 2404.
H ab. Valparaiso.—This we have received from Dr. Gillies aud Mr. Cruckshanks; and the former
gentleman has been so fortunate as to add three other sjiecies to this beautiful genus, by his researches in
South America.
3. CALCEOLARIA. Linn.
1. C. integrifolia; foliis ovato-lanceolatis lanceolatlsve denticulatis rugosis opacis subtus
ferrugineis, caule calycibusque pubescentibus, paniculis terminalibus pedunculatis. Lindi.
a. latifolia; foliis ovato-lanceolatis argute denticulatis. L in d i.—C. integrifolia. Bot.
Reg. t. 744.—C. rugosa. Bot. Mag. t. 2523.— C. salvisefolia. Schlecht et Cham.— Cliachoul.
Feuill. ChU. V. 3. t 7.
¡3. angustifolia I foliis utrinque attenuatis grosse denticulatis, paniculis longius ped u n culatis.
L in d t in B o t Reg. t 1083.
H ab. a. Conception. /J. Valparaiso.—We, too, consider the narrow-leaved plant as a state of C.
integrifolia, although cultivation for some years in our garden proves it to be a permanent variety. In
the Botanical Mag'aziue, the same plant has since been called C. rugosa; but it is neither C. rugosa,
Ruiz .and Pav. v. 1. t. 286, nor of Hooker’s Exotic Flora, t. 99. It has beeu also named C. sahiafolia
by Schlecbtond.ol and Chamisso in the Liunma, v. 2. p. 565, who have been apparently led into this
error by following Cavanilles, (Ic. v. 5. p. 31,) and by not having seen the figure of C. rugosa in the
Flora Peruviana. Iu the herbarium, these species are very difficult of determination, the important
differences existing in the upper lip of their corolla. In Feuillée’s plant, and, consequently, iu Liunmus’ C.
integrifolia, Sp. PI. ed. 13, (not 14, nor of Smith’s Ic. in ed. 1. t. 3, which is C. ovata, Roem. et Sch.) the
upper lip, though uot half so lai'ge as the lower, is similar to it in shape, and closes up its mouth. ' In C.
rugosa, Fl. Per. aud Hook. Ex. Fl. (the C. scabiosafolia of Ne'e in Cav. Ic. L c.) the upper lip is so
exti-emely minute as to be at first scai-cely discernible, and it is of a totally different shape from the lower.
2. C. corymbosa; foliis radicalibus ovatis cordatisque petiolatis bicrenatis, caulinis cor