reiro. In C. cana of Linnæus, Vahl, Roxburgh, and Wallich, the leaves are cnneate at the base, becoming,
as it wefe, half decurreift along the petiole. Either tho present or the following one is probably C. Reevesii
of Wallich’s List, which we have not seen.
2. Callicarpa nudiflora; ramis petiolis foliis subtus corymbisque cano-velutinis, foliis
oblongo-lanceolatis basi ovatis margine crenato-dentatis supra nervis venisque incanis
cæteroquin glabratis lævibus junioribus pulverulentis, pedunculis folio subdimidio brevioribus,
corymbis dichotomis laxis, calyce glabro, staminibus exsertis. (T a b . X L V I .)
H ab. Canton; Mr. Millett. Lappas island; Rev. G. H. VacheU, n. 2 6 3 .
T ab. XLVI. Callicarpa nudiflora. Fig. 1. Flower:—magnified.
1. Vitex ovata ; foliis simplicibus obovatis breve-petiolatis subtus albo-incanis, racemis
axillaribus terminalibusque compositis. ( T ab. X L V I I .)— Thunb. Jap. p . 257.
H a b . Canton; Mr. Millett; Rev . G. H Vachell,n. 174.
T ab. XLVII. Vitex ovata. Fig. 1. Flower:—magnified.
2. Vitex Negundo. L in n .—Lour. ,Fl. Coch. 2. p. 474.
H a b . Islands near Macao; Rev. G. H. Vachell, n. 2 7 9 .
3. Vitex L o u re ir i; ramis foliisque ternato-quinatis utrinque glabris, foliolis oblongo vel
obovato-lanceolatis obtuse acuminatis basi cuneatis venosis nitidis integerrimis, paniculis
terminalibus vel ex axillis superioribus pubescentibus erectis decompositis strictiusculis.
( T ab. X L V I I I .)—Cornutia quinata.. Lour. Fi. Coch. 2. p . 470.
H ab . Canton ; Mr. Millett.
We have not seen the fruit ; Loureiro states it to be one-seeded, probably from abortion.
T a b . XLV III. Vitex Loureiri. Fig. 1. Flower:—m
O r d . L X I IL A C A N T H A C EÆ . Juss.
I . Barleria cristata. L in n .— Nees ah Esenh. in Wall. PI. As. Rar. 3. p . 92. n. 10.
H ab. Lappas Island or the Peninsula; Mr. VacheU, n. 170. Canton; Mr. MiUett.
1. Dilivaria ilicifolia. J u ss.— Nees ah Esenb. I. c. p . 98. n. 1.
H ab . Whancum Island, near Macao; Rev. G. H. Vachell, n. 121. Loureiro, F l . Coch. 2 . p . 4 5 6 , states
that the Canton plant differs a little from that which he describes from Cochin-China: the former is the
same as our’s ; the latter is D . ehracteata, Juss.
I. Crossandra infundibuliformis, ¡3.; Nees ab Esenb. 1. c. p. 98. n. 1.—C. undulæfolia.
A it.—Justicia infundibuliformis. Lin n .
We fear that C. oppositifolia, Wight, (N. ab Esenb. 1. c. n. 3.) is a mere form of this species.
1. 'RosieWa.ria. procumbens. Nees ab E senb.l. c. p . \ 6 \ . n. 4 .—Justicia procumbens. Lin n .
1. Graptophyllum hortense. Nees ab Esenh. I. c .p . 102. n. 1.—Justicia picta. L in n .—
Lour. El. Coch. l . p . 29.
1. Adhadota Vasica. Nees ab Esenb. I. c. p. 103. n. 7.—Justicia Adhadota. Linn.
TA B . X L V I
H i i i i - Î