i i8 F r A ÖM Til N t A
LXXÏII. (p. Ö5‘ lxxxviii.)
Pausahias in. Laconicis(III, 25*) p* 274‘ dé oppidc»
Pyrrhicho: *sl<sl Ss 01 Sikqvbv èx Makéag. sk'd’ovra svtav&a
XéyöiVGiv oïxijffat' TQuyrjvat [lévioi tov ^ikijvov &v xy Mm-»
kén Srjkoï xal rade è% aopaxog UwSaQov’
CÖ gapsyryg ëè, 6 yv0Q0i?vn°$} ov
MaXsuyovög s&QSips Naièog uxoifag
é£i%Y}vóg.
(Sg Ss xal nv§§t%oe ovoua vy» avxü, JJivSaQcy fiev ovx sariv
sÏQVjfjiéyoVt kéyovoi Ss ol hsqI tt[V Makeav oixovvxsg^i^cns.
'Spectauit forte ad eundem locum, vnde est fragiii. ap.
Athen, XL p. 476. B. n. LX. (xun.)
LXXÏV. tp.' 107. -GLpii.)
Pausanias in Eliacis (V, 22. extr.) p. 436. key er ai
SI ég psv K oqxvquv, wg [ux&drj IlousiSiïv avzrj' zQiavzu
m èrsQa yae TlivSaqogsg W ß iv ™ ml 5 3 ?* Ideip
. scriptor (lib. V, 14.) pag. 41a. Pin darum laudat de Ä1-
pheo: fiera Ss rovg xaxsfkeyfiévovg Akcpeiü xai Aqts(uSl
&VOV01V êrtl êvbg ßcouov. to d’ aïviov tövtov arwosdijäwoe
fiér rtov xal IlivdaQO^ sv oidij, ygayopsv Ss xal yfuig êv
rovg kóyotg xdtg AsTQiwioig- De his agit Pausan. Vi, 22.
p. 5x0. Respexisse* videtur Nèm. I. vbi vide Scholia
graeca, et inprimis Strabonem VI p. 41(5- ~ ®*dem
fere dubitatio est de loco Synesii in Laude Calvitii p.
77. Petav. qui an ad residuorum Pindari Carminum ali-
quod referri commode possit^ nöndum exputaui: av \isv
yuQ y rijg mvSuQOV TvyyMSiv svy^g, xal B M w W
mtb Twv olxsmv, sv xdky tov »frsazQOv xa&i&jooiie&a
axQoaral x&v Sswvvfiémv xal Ssaxa’r *av yo^ffav Séy
TTj nókei, xav anodöaeiß b Srjfiog am;, XQWÓps&a yeyako-
KQsniïg rotg bmtQXOvar too ' Smpovtov Sh bvxmvevaavTog,
xal T&v .aXyhoiV èniksmbvTW, o /MjSévl't&v &sicov avSgcov
naQsysmo, to yovv soxatov ^ ns<JU räv mi(äv 5
LXXV. (p. 82. r-Xxviii.) •
Pausanias 'in Achaicis (VII, 26.) -pag. P É 'f#
ovv IIivSuQOv ra xs dkka >neëdó{iai täP Mo r qmv tb
dvai [iiav t^v Tvy^v, xal v i r è g (adekyds tl lofrvsiv-
LXXVI. (p. 60. xViilj^n0
' Lucianus Imag. p. 8- Proiïjgyov
avr$ xal ö &%ßavog noLryr^g^, wg hoßkecpaQOV
i^SQymaa&at. Idem pro Imag,. c,isaö. ^
Tig lo fik s<pagov TTjv AcpQO(tirijV ëqxfj. Dixerat e^go-Pin-
darus alicubi Venerem ïofikècpaQoVj qua rationa, Euadnen
loßoGTQVXov appellat 'trfymp. VI, 50. ét Alcaeus in Apol-
lonii Grammat, ipedita apqfl Al^efti ad Hesychium v.
Haiti habet : ,.
ZdsLöov uu ut %av ïóxo'knav. -
quem eundem locum pessime scriptum vulgauit J. F.
Reitz ad Maittair. Dialect. Gr. p. 430. Schn.
Laüdatur quoque Ok VI, 4* in Hippia 7. 01. I. pr.
in Gallo 7. et in Timone 4u
LXXVÏI. (p. 55- iv.)
Aristides T. I. p. 8* de lone:
•fretov <xts nXsov r i Äcc%gjv *
■toCto yoQ oiiv TlivSugq) xakkiov ^ akP o.tiovv eiQtjrai tcsqI
JtSg. vbi Abresch in Obs. Miscell. X. p. 234* e* vesti-
giis lib^i Barocciani malebat legere:
{kiog UT8 tiXsov ts
quod equidem non capio.
LXXVHI. (p. 55- V.)
-Idem T. I. p. 10. de Mrnerua lour assidente: IlivSa-
poj d’ av <f)T]&l Se£iav xaza ydQa rotf navfibg avTtjv xa&s-
^QfiévtjV Tag êvtokag roig 'd'soïg tmoSéysG'd'ai. Eodem pertï-
net, quod Plütarchus affert ex Pindaro Quaest. Conuiu.
I, 2. p'. Ó17. C. de Minerua: dia^ijStjv dè b IlivduQog kéyei\
TLVj) TlvéoVTOg UT8 X8QUVV0V Uy%l6TU rjfisvri.