
 
        
         
		to Sagina,  to be far removed  from that genus, while  the  habit  is  not  that of  any of  this  Order.  The  present  
 plant  differs  from  its  congeners  in  being  rigid  and  somewhat  pungent ;  the  structure  of  the  flower  however  
 entirely  agrees  with  that of  the  previously  described  species.  All  the  specimens  I  have  examined from  this  
 locality have  a  5-sepalous perianth,  which in the  South American  state  of  the plant is as invariably 4-sepaIous.  
 It is  also  apt  to  assume here a monstrous state, the central  axis  of the  capsule  becoming proliferous and sending  
 out from  the position of the placenta  (in  the  natural state)  two foliaceous  shoots,  each with two pairs of leaves,  
 projecting beyond the perianth,  and  the  o\-ules  (abortive)  arranged  round  the  bases  of these  shoots. 
 2.  CoLOBANTHUS  Ho o k .  fil. ;  densissime  com p actu s  carnosus,  ram is  confertis  foliosis, 
   foliis  are te   im b ric a tis  p a ten tim   recu rv is  lin e a ri-su b u la tis  o b tu sis  su p ra   planis  b asi  la ta   connatis,  
 p ed u n cu lis  brevissimis  solitariis  te rm in a lib u s   su p e rn e   in c ra ssa tis,  p erian th io   herbáceo  parvo  compresso 
 ,  sepalis  4  erectis  lanceolatis  o b tu sis  concavis  exterioribus  ma joribus  dorso  obscure  c a riu atis,  
 s tam in ib u s  4  p e r p a ria   ap p ro x im a tis  ex  an n u lo   perig y n o   in c rassato   ortis. 
 H a b .  L o rd   A u ck lan d ’s  g ro u p   an d   Campbell’s  Is la n d  ;  on  w et  rocks  especially  n e a r  th e   sea,  
 an d   im mediately  above  h ig h -w a te r m a rk . 
 The  smallest species  in  regard to  size  of  leaves  and  flower with which  I  am  acquainted,  and yet perhaps  
 most nearly  allied  to  the  finest  of  the  genus,  a  Kerguelen's Land  species.  The whole plant  is  densely matted  
 and fleshy, forming compact tufts.  Stems 3-4 inches long.  Leaves 2 lines.  The flowers are much compressed,  
 very minute and inconspicuous,  1  line long, sunk  among the leaves.  Perianth of four erect sepals,  of which the  
 lateral are larger, more  concave,  and keeled  at  the  back.  Perigynous ring very  conspicuous,  and  swollen  into  
 two large yellow fleshy glands between  the bases  of the  stamens. 
 3.  C o l o b a n t h u s  Bilia rd ie ri, Fen z l, A n n .  Wien. Mus.  1.  4 ^ , in  not.  S p e rg u la   ap e tala ,  L a b .F l.  
 No v. HolL  vol. i .p . 1 1 2 .1 . 182.  VeC. P ro d r .  vol. i. p. 395.  Hook. fi l.  in B o t.  Journ.  vol.  ii.  p.  410.  
 S tellaria  uniflora.  Ba n k s  a n d  Sol. M S S . in  Mus.  Bank s. 
 H a b .  Campbell’s  Is lan d  ;  on  b an k s   n e a r  th e   sea,  scarce. 
 This  species was  originally  discovered by Banks  and  Solander at  Totarra  nui,  in  the Northern  Island  of  
 New Zealand,  during Captain Cook’s  first voyage,  and  an  excellent drawing of it,  by Parkinson,  is  presen-ed in  
 the Banksian collection.  Labillardière  afterwards  detected  it  in  Tasmania, whence Mr.  Gunn  sent  beautiful  
 specimens,  in  describing which  I  had  occasion  to  notice  its near  affinity  with  the  genus  Sagina.  Fenzl  {I. c.  
 according to Walper’s Reperì,  vol. ii. p. 249)  quotes the  Sagina  crassifoUa,  D’Urv.,  as  a synonym  of his C. Biliardieri, 
   and reduces  the  original  plant of Labillardière to  a variety, under the  name  of (3.  procerior.  Wha t  I  
 take for the plant of Admiral D’Urville, whose description (Mém. Soc. Linn.  Paris, vol. iv.  p.  617) is very characteristic, 
   is much larger,  of a different habit, and with truly linear very fleshy leaves, and  is common  in the  Falklands, 
   as well  as  the  C. Quitensis, Bartl., which  is  closely allied to  the  C.  affinis  (Spergula  affinis.  Hook. Icon.  
 Plant, vol.  iii. t.  266).  Labillardière says of the stamens of C. Biliardieri,  “  sub pistillo inserta,”  but this is  not  
 the  case with the  specimens  I  have examined.  They are  clearly  placed  at  the  exterior of  a membranous  disc  
 which  surrounds  the perianth,  remote  from  the  base of  the  ovary.  The Campbell’s  Island specimens are very  
 small,  scarcely an  inch  high, whereas the Tasmanian  are twice  or thrice that size. 
 i . 
 XI.  C R A S SU L A C E ^ ,  DeC. 
 1.  B c l l ia r d a  mosckata,  D ’Un -., FL In s . M a l.  L c.  p.  618.  Gaud,  in  Fre y c .  Voy.  B o t.  p .  138. 
 B.  Magellanica, DeC. Bu ll. Philom. n. 4 9 ,  T i ll^ a  mo sch a ta, DeC. P ro d r .  vol. iii.  p . 3 8 2 .  Hook. Icon.  
 P la n t,  t.  535.  Crassu la moscha ta, F o rst. A c t.  Goett. ix.  p. 26. 
 H a b .  L o rd   A u ck lan d ’s  g ro u p   an d   Cam p b ell’s  I s la n d ;  ab u n d a n t  on  w et  ro ck s  im m ed ia te ly   
 above  h ig h -w a te r mark. 
 Petalo patentia,  obovato-cuneata,  concava,  albida,  s®pe  rubro-striata.  Filamento  subulata,  carnosa,  siccitate  
 compressa et u t ridetur  dilatata.  Squama  hypoggna 4,  carpellis  oppositis  et iis  paulo  breviores,  cuneat®.  
 Carpella  trigona,  obovata,  superne oblique  truncata,  dorso  canaliculata :  stylis  brevibus,  recurvis. 
 The  geographical  range  of  this  species  is wide,  being found  along the west  coast of South  America,  from  
 lat. 46°  S.  to  Cape Horn,  and  also  in  the  Falklands  and  Kerguelen’s Land,  but nowhere  so  abundantly  as  in  
 this group.  Notwithstanding  the name  given  it  by  its  discoverer,  I was unable  to  detect any  odour of musk  or  
 smell of any kind  in the  fresh  plant. 
 XII.  UMBELLIFERÆ,  Juss. 
 I .  P O Z O  A,  Lag. 
 S u b g en .  S c h iz e il e m a ,  Hook. fi l.  {Involucrum  o-Q-pliylluni.  Flores  h ermaphroditi.— Herbáceo- 
 1.  P o zoA   reniforrais.  Ho o k ,  fil.;  foliis  lo n g e  p e tio la tis  ren ifo rm ib u s  mu ltilo b a tis  lobis  latis  
 re tu sis, petiolis basi v ag in an tib u s, p ed u n cu lis  petiolo b revioribus,  in v o lu cri foliobs  3 - 4   lin e a rib u s,  p e dicellis  
 5—7  b rev ib u s,  calycis  lobis  late ovatis ob tu sis.  (T a b .  X I .) 
 H a b .  L o rd  A u ck lan d ’s  g ro u p ;  clefts  o f ro ck s  an d   am o n g st  sto n es  on   th e   hills,  a lt.  1400  feet. 
 Herba pusilla, glaberrima, carnosa,  facie Hydrocotylis, graveolens.  Caulis  crassitie  penn® passerinæ,  longe  
 repens,  articulatus,  nodosus,  ad nodos  cicatricatus,  apice foliosus.  Folia - i - | unc.  lata, exacte reniformia,  luride  
 viridia,  nitentia, radiatim  venosa,  lobis late  rotundatis.  Petioli  2-3  unciales ;  vaginis basi magnis latis, superne  
 acutis.  Pedunculi ex  axillis foliorum, breves, semipollicares.  Pedicelli vix  2  lin. longi.  Petalo  parva,  obovata,  
 subacuta, medio  late  uninèrvia.  Slylopodia  superne  truncata.  Fructus  oblongus,  tetragonus;  mericarpiis  demum  
 dorso  canaliculatis, 
 A  decidedly  extra-tropical  South  American  form,  belonging  to  a  section  of  the  Nat.  Ord.  hitherto  un known  
 to the Floras  both of New Zealand  and Australia.  The  remarkable  similarity  of the  flower  and fruit to  
 those  of the P. coriacea. Lag.  (Hook. Bot. Misc. vol. i.  p. 331. t.  66),  together with the  uniformity in the  structure  
 of  its calyx  and  petals with  that  plant,  have  induced  me  to  refer  it  to  the  same  genus ;  but,  from  the  
 difference  in  habit and  the  structure  of  the  involucre  of  the  species  thus  brought together.  I  have  ventured to  
 place this in  a separate  subgenus.  The  original  species  (P .  coriacea),  and  the  P . hydrocotylifolia.  Bridges  and  
 Fielding  (Sertum  Plant,  t. 40),  have  the  flowers monoecious,  a character  I  do  not observe  in  this.  The similarity  
 which  the present plant bears to the genus Azorella,  Gaud,, is in many respects  close ;  the mericarps of this  
 are  hardly  '■ paraUelim  blscutata,”  whilst those  of Azorella are  scarcely  didymous.  Though  a very  remarkable  
 habit  runs  through  most  of  the species  of  the la tter genus,  one  of  them,  the  A . Ranunculus,  D’Urv.,  not  only  
 differs from  its  congeners in  form  and mode  of growth,  but in  these  respects much resembles  this plant.  In  the