
 
        
         
		From the Mortonian collection, other illustrations of this fact might  
 be drawn; but neither space nor time permits their introduction here. 
 In the study of the sutures, considerations of a highly philosophical  
 character  are  involved.  Their  history enables  us  to  perceive why  
 the  cranium was not  formed of  one  piece, and why there  should  be  
 two frontal and two parietal bones, and only one occipital.  Such an  
 arrangement obviously allows the fullest development of the anterior  
 and middle lobes of the cerebrum,—the organs, according  to Carus,  
 of  intelligence,  reflection,  and  judgment.82  That  the  sutures  are  
 tutamina cerebri,  that in the foetus  they permit  the  cranial  bones to  
 overlap during  parturition,  and thus,  by diminishing the size of the  
 head in certain  of its diameters,  and producing anaesthesia,  facilitate  
 labor,  curtailing  its  difficulties and diminishing  its  dangers to both  
 mother  and  child,  there  can he no  doubt.  Such  provisions  are  of  
 high  interest,  as  exhibiting  the  harmony of  nature.  But when we  
 call to mind  that  the skull  is a vertebra in its highest  known  state  
 of development; that the enclosed brain, as the organ of intellection,  
 is  the  distinguishing  mark  of man;  that  the  development  of  the  
 cranium  goes  on  pari passu with  that  of the  encephalon;  that  the  
 various degrees of human intelligence are definitely related to certain  
 permanent skull-forms;  and that the cranial  sutures,  in conjunction  
 with the  ossific centres,  are the -guiding agents in the  assumption of  
 these forms—it will be evident  that a higher  and  far more comprehensive  
 significance  is  attached  to these bony interspaces.  Again,  
 no  extended  investigation has been instituted,  as far as I  am aware,  
 to  determine  the  period  at which  the  different  cranial  sutures  are  
 closed in the various, races of men.  The importance  of  such  an  inquiry  
 becomes  apparent, when we  ask ourselves  the following questions  
 :—1.  Does the cranium attain its fullest development in all the  
 races  at  the  same,  or  at  different  periods  of life ?  and 2.  To what  
 extent are race-forms of the cranium dependent upon the growth and  
 modifications of the sutures ? 
 “ The  most obvious  use of  the sutures,” according  to  Dr. Morton,  “ is  to  subserve  the  
 process of  growth, which  they do by  osseous depositions'at their  margins.  Hence,  one of  
 these sutures is  equivalent to the interrupted  structure  that exists  between  the  shaft  and  
 epiphysis of  a long bone in the growing state.  The shaft grows in length chiefly by accretions  
 at  its  extremities;  and  the  epiphysis,  like  the  cranial  suture,  disappears when the  
 perfect development is accomplished.  Hence, we may infer that the skull ceases to expand  
 whenever the  sutures  become consolidated with the proximate  bones.  In  other words,  the  
 growth of  the brain, whether in viviparous  or  in oviparous  animals,  is consentaneous with  
 that of  the  skull,  and neither can be developed without the presence  of  free  sutures.” 83 
 82  “ Das besondere Organ des erkennenden, vergleichenden und urtheilenden Geistesleben.”  
 r- Symbolik der menschlichen  Gestalt, von Dr. C.  G.  Carus, Leipzig,  1858. 
 83 See article on Size  of  the Brain,  &c.,  quoted above,  p.  303. 
 From  investigations  of this  nature,  and  from  other - considerations,  
 Dr; M.  concluded  that  the growth of the  brain was  arrested  at  the  
 i P i l w   f   consolidation  of the sutures was an indication  of  
 the  full development of both  cranium  and  brain,  and  that  any increase  
 or decrease in the size or weight of the brain  after  the  adult  
 period wquld not be likely to  affect the internal  capacity of the  cra-  
 n.1Uf1f ’ ^ lch’ S B R  indicates the maximum size of the encephalon  
 at  the  time  of its  greatest  development,  Combe,  however,  affirms  
 that when  the  brain  contracts  in  old  age,  the  tabula vitrea  of the  
 cranium also  contracts,  so  as  to  keep itself  applied  to  its  contents,  
 the  outer  or  fibrous  table  undergoing no change.84  It  is,  to  some  
 extent,  true that m the very aged, even when the skull-bones become  
 consolidated into one piece,  some  changes may result from an undue  
 activity of the absorbents,  or some defect in the nutritive operations  
 Fnder  such  cmcumstances,  the  cranial  bones  maybe  thinned  and  
 altered slightly m form.  D avis  gives an  example of this change,  in  
 the skull of an aged Chinese  in  his  collection,  in which  the cfntral  
 area of the parietal  bones is thinned  and  depressed over  an  extent  
 equal to four square inches to about one-third of an inch deep in the  
 central part.  Such changes, however, are too limited in their extent  
 to demand, more than a passing notice. 
 The  pressure  of  the  brain,  exerted  through  its  weight,  is  felt  
 mainly upon the base and inferior lateral parts. 
 Prof. E ngel,  in a valuable monograph upon skull-forms,86 particularly  
 calls attention to the action of the muscles in determining these  
 forms.  He considers the influence of the occipito-frontalis as almost  
 •  aPPreeiable, — bo  slight,  indeed,  that  it  may be  neglected  in  our  
 nquines.  R e  action of the temporal and pterygoid muscles and of  
 ffie group attached to the occiput,  though  more  evident,  is  still  not  
 worthy  of  much  consideration.  To  the  action  of  the  musculus  
 sterno-cleido-mastoideus, he assigns a greater value. 
 “ This muscle,” says he,  “ tends to produce a downward displacement at the  
 bon of the temporal bone, which will he the more considerable, as the lower point of its a t ^ T   
 ment- t h e   sternum and c la v ic le -is  able  to  offer much greater  resistance than t,S   
 In  addition  to  this,  the unusual  length  of  the  muscle  produces  hv it.  *  •  npper' 
 effect,  and,  hence,  favors a greater displacement of the hones tb which it isa tteh ed '’  
 bone upon which it exerts  its influence is also  very loose in  earlv life  j  .' 
 firstyear  of  our  existence,  when  extensive  motions  o  “ h e n 2 e   2 e T d v t T   
 »ot as firmly fixed  as the other hones; hence, it becomes g S £   
 muscle upon the position  of  the hones of  the  skull will he a demonstrable  one  6  ° 
 may, however, be admitted à priori, that in  spite  of all these favorable circumstances, 
 84 System of  Phrenology,  p.  83.  ,  ~   ~   ■  '------- -------- 
 “  Op  C if’’ P‘  6'  866 aIS0'Ga11’  I S”  les Fonctions  Cerveau,”  III,  53,  1825.