
 
		the under surface  of  the  skull,  instead  of merely  seeing the  posterior  end  of  the  
 presphenoid  and  the  foramen  lacerum  orbitale  on each side of  it, the presphenoid  
 is seen not to he  thrown  so  far  forwards  as  in  such  mice  as M.  tt/rbcmus  and  M.  
 homurus, and anterior to the foramen lacerum orbitale a spicule of  hone is distinctly  
 observable on each side of  the presphenoid, passing outwards and  expanding  in  the  
 orbit  as  the orbital plate of  the sphenoid, and anterior to each of  these fine osseous  
 rods the optic foramina are clearly visible. 
 The  infraorbital  foramen  does  not form an  incision in the anterior margin of  
 the maxillary root of  the zygoma, as in Mus generally. 
 The  pterygoid fossa is very shallow, and formed chiefly by the palatines, and its  
 base  or  floor  is  flattened  and  expanded  as  in  M.  homurus  and  M. urbanus,  hut,  
 unlike  these  mice, is  marked  by  a  number of  imperfections of  ossification.  I t is  
 very  shallow  compared  with  what  it  is  in  such  burrowing  rats  as  Nesokia  and  
 the  so-called  bandicoot  M.  giganteus,  in  which  it  is  very  deep  and  perforated  
 at  its base.  The inner walls of  the pterygoid fossa are entire, which is also the case  
 in the small mice already mentioned, whereas in these larger species just named there  
 are generally one or more large imperfections on the inner wall. 
 With  regard  to  the  number  of  species, Hodgson indicated another in addition  
 to M.  ( V.) oleraceus, hut the following table does not reveal any marked  distinction  
 between two Nepal specimens and examples from Central India, CMrd-punji, Burma,  
 and Western  Yunnan ;  any differences  that do occur are probably due to individual  
 variation, or to the diversity in the physical conditions of  the localities  from whence  
 the animals come.  I  am therefore disposed to  recognize  only  one  species.  I t  will  
 he observed that the upper dental line is the same in all. 
 I   would  also  direct particular attention to the proportions which the tail holds  
 to the body in the young animal, as it only  slightly exceeds the  length of the trunk,  
 while in the adult it is nearly half as long again as the body and  head.  Erom this it  
 is evident that the rapidity of  the growth of  the tail must he considerable,  and  this  
 probably  conduces  to  that  variation in the length of the tail which is so observable  
 in adult individuals of the same  species.  This  would  seem  to  be  the  case  in  the  
 long-tailed  rat  which  usually  goes  under  the name of M. rufescens, in which the  
 proportion of the tail to the body in the young and adult animals is much  the same  
 as in M.  {V.) oleraceus. 
 Measurements o f Mus  ( V.)  oleraceus, Bennett. 
 Tip of muzzle to vent  
 Length of tail 
 „  hind foot  
 Height of  ear 
 ) 0-70  0  
 5  0-55  0 
 2  3 00  
 5  4 50  
 ) 0-70  
 )  0 65 
 2-65  2  65  
 4-20  3-72  
 0  70  0-64  
 0*59  0-48 
 0-82 
 0-47 
 0'20 
 Measurements o f skulls of foregoing. 
 ‘ l ’f 
 e 
 5 
 6 
 1 
 1 j 
 1 
 1 
 t 
 . Jf §. 
 It t 
 11 
 < W A M n !a B J 5 6 'A a * 
 i <f s i 9 9 9 9 9 9, 9 9 9 9 Juv. juv. 
 of premaxillffl  . . . .   
 Tip  of  premaxilbe  to  middle  of 
 0-90 0-87 0*86 0*77 0*75 0*83 0*78 
 f o r a m e n ........................................ 0'26 0*20 0*20 0*17 0*17 0*20 0*19 0*21 0*19 
 0*13 0*14 0*14 0*14 0*13 0*14 Olfi 
 Greatest breadth across parietals  . 0*42 0*47 0*43 0*4i 0*40 0*40 0*41 0*46 0*43 
 arch  ................................................. 
 Tip o f  premaxilbe  to  posterior bor- 
 0-49 0*50 0*48 0*46 0*45 0*47 0*43 
 0 ’45 0*45 0*45i 0*41 0*37 0*4J 0*4iJ 
 Length of palate  . . . .   
 Posterior  border  of  palate  to 
 0-17 0*19 0*19 0*17 016 0*16 O’lV 0*19 0*19 
 0*34 0*35 0*33 0*29 ... 0*29 0*31 0*28 0*30 0*30 
 (molar series)  . . . . 0*16 0*15 0*16 0*16 0*16 016 0*16 0*16 
 *Mus  (V a n d e l e t j r ia )   o l e r a c e u s ,   Bennett. 
 Mus oleraceus, Bennett,  Proc.  Zool. Soc., June  26,  1832, p.  121; Elliot,  Madr.  Joum. Lit. and Sc.  
 Oct.  1839, p. 214;  Wagner,  Schreber,  Saugeth.  Suppl.  pi.  iii.  1843,  p.  422;  Schinz,  Syn.  
 Mamm.j vol. ii., 1845,  p.  150;  Blyth, Cat.  Mamm.  As.  Soc. Mus.,  1868, p.  120;  Journ. As.  
 Soc., Beng., vol. xxxii., 1868, p. 844;  Jerdon, Mamm. of Ind.,  1867, p. 202. 
 Mus longicaudaim, Elliot, Madr. Joum. Lit. and Sc..  July 1889, p. 94, etp. 214. 
 Vmdeleuria oleraceus, Gray, Ann.  and Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. x., Dec.  1842, p.  265. 
 Mus  (Vandelewria)  dwneticola, Hodgson, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. xv., April 1845, p.  268. 
 ? Mus povensis, Hodgson, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., vol. xv., April 1845, p. 269. 
 The muzzle is moderately long and slightly contracted  behind  the  moustachial  
 area.  The  eye  is  rather  large,  also  the  ears, which  are sparsely clad and more or  
 less rounded at the tips.  In height they nearly equal  the distance between the end  
 of the muzzle and half-way between the  eye  and  ear.  The  length  of  the  head  is  
 about  one-third  the  length  of  the  body.  The feet are moderately strong, and  the  
 toes are of nearly equal breadth throughout, and  the  claws  are  rather  short.  The  
 tail  is  about  one-half  longer  than  the  combined  length of the head and body.  I t  
 tapers to a point, is finely ringed, about thirty rings to the half inch, and is sparsely  
 clad with short hairs between the rings.  The hairs are more  numerous  and longer  
 towards the end of the tail. 
 The upper surface is rich rufous, or chestnut-red, paling to brown on the ears and  
 on the muzzle before the eyes;  the sides of the face below the eyes and moustachial  
 area,  the  chin,  throat, and  under parts generally are white, with a yellowish tinge.  
 The feet pale-brown, passing  almost into  white on the  toes.  The pads  and undersurface  
 of the feet yellowish.  The tail brownish or dusky; the hairs greyish.