
 
		routed  the guard of 6,000, which  preceded  the  king, and killed  
 their  commander.  At  this  moment,  when  the  king  thought  
 whiTst makind ^   was  lost,  Cyrus  rushed  heedlessly  forward,  and  just as  he  
 an impetuous  had  reached and wounded his  brother  in the midst of his guards, 
 charge. a  dart brought  him  to  the  ground  at his feet,  and he perished  
 covered with wounds.1  The  success  of  Artaxerxes  was  however  
 limited  to  this  event,  and to some  trifling  advantages  over  
 the  left  of Cyrus,  which  enabled  him  to plunder  the  tents, &c.,  
 for,  on  the  other flank,  Clearchus was  quite  successful.2  It  is  
 ciearchus  therefore  evident,  that  if  Clearchus  had  obeyed  the  orders  of 
 loss of  the  Cyrus,  the  Greeks  would  have  broken  the  centre  as  easily as 
 att e'  they forced  the  left of Artaxerxes’  army. 
 Being for some time  ignorant of the  death  of their chief they  
 thought  the  victory  had  been  completely  won,  and such was  
 their  impression  till  the  following  day,  when  they received a  
 message  from  Ariaeus,  that  he  would  wait  for  them  a  short  
 time  in  his  former  encampment  previously  to  returning  to  
 Ionia. 
 The Greeks immediately sent  to  offer the  crown  to Ariaeus,  
 as  the  fruit  of  the  victory,  which  they  believed  they  had  
 achieved;  but,  before  they  received his  answer,3 a message was  
 delivered  from  the  king,  commanding them to lay down their  
 arms.  To this,  notwithstanding his  extremely precarious situation, 
   Clearchus replied with much dignity,  that it was not usual  
 for  conquerors to  deliver up  their arms.4 
 After  nightfall,  40  horse  and  300  Thracian  foot,  under  
 The Greeks  Miltocythes,  deserted  to  Artaxerxes;  and about midnight,  the  
 camp o f 4116  remainder  of  the  Greeks,  under Clearchus,  reached the  camp  
 Arraus.  0f   Ariaeus,6  which  was  probably  a  short  distance  in  the  rear,  
 and not far from  the  river,  as  the  baggage had  been directed  to  
 follow the stream.6  A  consultation  immediately followed,  and  
 the Persian  chief  gave  the  benefit  of  his  local  experience,  by  
 pointing  out  for  their  retreat  a  route  preferable  to  that  by  
 which they had advanced,  on  account  of  its  affording a better  
 prospect  of obtaining provisions  and protection  from the cavalry 
 *  Anabasis, lib.  I., cap.  viii.  
 3  Ibid.,  lib.  I I .,  cap.  ii. 
 5  See Map No.  7. 
 2  Ibid.,  lib.  I., cap. x. 
 4  Ibid.,  cap.  i. 
 °  Anabasis,  lib.  I I ,  cap.  ii. 
 of  their  pursuers.  These  observations  had  due  weight  with The Greeks^  
 the  Greeks,  and it was  determined  to  commence  that retreat; t em y   
 the accomplishment of which  constitutes  an  event unrivalled  in  
 military history,  and  first  demonstrated  the  weakness  of  the  
 Persian  monarchy.  Previously  to setting  out there was made,  
 under  the  oaths  of  the  leading  Greek  and  Persian  officers,  
 who  dipped  their  swords  and  spears  in  the  mingled  blood of  
 a bull,  a wolf,  and  a  ram,1  a  compact, in which  the  barbarians  
 engaged  faithfully  to  conduct  the  Greeks  on  their  homeward  
 route.  The  troops were then put  in motion,  it being intended,  
 agreeably  to the  recommendation  of  Ariaeus,  to  substitute for  
 the  exhausted line near the Euphrates, one  through  the  villages  
 along the Tigris.  The Greeks were to make very long marches Thebne.rf  
 through Mesopotamia,  and  thus  get  well in  advance, m order chosen for  
 that  the  king  might  be  unable  to  attack  them  with  a  large attempt,  
 force;  a small one  they had no reason to  fear.2 
 Accordingly,  in  the presence  of  overwhelming numbers, the  
 daring  attempt  to  force  a  passage  northwards,  through  provinces  
 and  territories  more  or  less  subject  to  the  king, was  
 commenced.  The first march3  proved so  far  inauspicious  thatTberetreat^  
 the Greeks went  to  rest  supperless,  in  consequence  of finding  
 the  villages,  which they  reached  that  night,  without  supplies,  
 having  been  recently  occupied  by  the  enemy,  whose  cavalry  
 was at hand,  and  even  in their  front.4 
 In  taking  a  northerly  direction from the  presumed  position Obstrac<mns  
 of the camp,  it would be  necessary to  cross  the  Nahr Malka; S2Cond march,  
 and on  account of this  obstruction,  as well  as  the  presence of  
 an  enemy,  the  distance  made would scarcely  exceed  ten  miles. 
 Patigued  by the  march,  and without  sustenance,  a  slight  circumstance  
 was sufficient  to  cause  a  tumult and almost  a panic  
 among the  Greeks.  The  panic was  however  speedily  calmed  
 by the  ingenuity  of  Clearchus,  and  at day-break  he marched  
 with  the intention  of  becoming  the  assailant.  This  bold  manoeuvre  
 led to  a  negotiation with  the king  on  equal terms,  and  
 guides were  in consequence  appointed to  conduct  the  Greeks  
 across the Nahr  Sersar,  and  its  affluents,  which  intersect this 
 1  Anabasis, lib.  I I .,  cap.  ii.  
 3  See Map No.  7. 
 2  Ibid., sec.  5. 
 4  Anabasis,  lib.  I I .,  cap.  ii.