
 
        
         
		8o 
 [   1694  ] 
 S C I R P U S   triqueter.  
 Triangular  Club-rush. 
 TRIANDRIA  Monogynia. 
 G en.  Char.  Glumes  chaffy,  imbricated  every  way,  
 all  fertile.  Cor. none.  Seed  1 . 
 Spec.  Char.  Stem  triangular,  straight,  naked,  sharp-  
 pointed.  Spikes  lateral,  sessile  or  pedunculated.  
 Stigmas two. Syn.  Scirpus  triqueter.  Linn. Mant.  1.  29.  Sm.  FI.  
 Brit.  55.  With.  76.  Hull.  14. 
 S.  mucronatus  (3.  Huds.  20. 
 Juncus  acutus  maritimus,  caule  triquetro  maximo  
 molli,  procerior  nostras.  Rail Syn.  428.  
 jS. Scirpus mucronatus.  With.  ed. 2. 50.  Huds.  20,  a.  
 Juncus  acutus  maritimus,  caule  triquetro  rigido,  mu-  
 crone  pungente.  Dill,  in  Raii  Syn.  429. 
 F o u n d ,  though  rarely,  about  the  muddy  banks  of  great  
 rivers  exposed  to  the  tide, especially in  the Thames, above  and  
 below  London.  Our  specimens were  gathered  in August  at  
 Lambeth,  Battersea,  &c. 
 Root  perennial,  creeping,  forming  large  entangled  tufts.  
 Stems  a yard  high,  erect,  naked,  triangular,  smooth,  sharp-  
 pointed,  the  angles more or  less  acute.  Spikes  near  the  top,  
 lateral,  generally,  but  not  always,  accompanied  by  a  small  
 sharp  floral  leaf.  They vary  much  in number,  as  well  as  m  
 the  length  of  their  stalks,  being  all  sometimes  quite  sessile,  
 in which  state  the  plant has been  taken,  though very wrongly,  
 for  S.  mucronatus  of  Linnaeus.  The  spikes have  a few  scales  
 between them,  and are  ovate,  their glumes  red-brown,  keeled,  
 pointed,  with  a  pale,  dilated,  jagged  margin.  The  stamens  
 are  accompanied by  2  or  3  short  rough  intermediate  bristles,  
 and  the  stigmas  are  2 * .  The  variety  /3,  found near  the  sea*  
 is  said  to  be more  hard  and  rigid  in  its stem. 
 *  W hich was justly observed b y  the late M r. W . B runton to,.be the case likewise  
 w ith  S .p a lustris,  though  in  pur  t.  131  three  are  expressed,^, T he  error  
 arose  from   S.  mulHcaulis not  being  then well  understood.  J m fM r -   T u rn e rs  
 Bot. Guide 667.  In the preceding page, indeed, my lafnentedS<ojTe^pondent has  
 charged me w ith an error of his ow n respecting Veronica.  C htttM j$ys,9» his spe-  
 cimens,  now  before me,  prove.  »