
 
        
         
		Mary,  daughter of  James  V.  of  Scotland, born 8 Dec.  1542,  
 succeeded  her father before  she was a  week  old,  and  married,  
 24 April,  1558, Francis the  Dauphin,  son  of  Henry H.J  King  
 of  France.  He died  5  Dec.  1560.  Vienne  is  the  capital  of  
 Lower Dauphiné,  and  has  given  the  title  to  the heir apparent  
 of  France  since  that  territory was  bequeathed  to  France  by  
 Humbert,  Dauphin of Vienne,  in the middle of  the fourteenth  
 century. 
 5.  M a r y ,   Q u e e n   o f   S o o t s .  M a r r i a g e .   1558. 
 Another ;  same  design as  the  last,  but  executed in  a larger  
 size  and in  a meagre  style. 
 2.  Trésor, Méd. Franç. Pl.  xiv.  8. 
 MB. Æ. Æ. 
 The  dies of  this medal  are  preserved  in the Mint  at  Paris,  
 and were executed in the  early  part of  this century.  I t is not  
 improbable that the design  for  this  medal was taken  from  the  
 preceding.  I t is very common,  and examples are struck in  all  
 the metals. 
 6.  M a r y ,   Q u e e n   o f   S c o t s .   C o u n t e r .   1558. 
 The Scottish Lion within the Garter inscribed,  h o n i   s o i t   q .  
 m a l   y   p e n c e .   Crown above. 
 Rev.  Shield of  the Dauphin of  France,  crowned.  Leg.  g o d 
 SAVE  THE  QVENE. 
 1-15. 
 MB.  lead.  Rare. 
 This piece  is  cast.  It  was  found  in  London,  and  is from  
 the Roach  Smith collection.  Though full  of  blunders,  it may  
 possibly  have  been  issued  as  a counter  by  some  ignorant 
 partisan  of Mary,  Queen  of  Scots.  Mary  was  never  elected 
 into the Order of  the Garter ;  it  was  as  sovereign  of  England  
 only that she could be entitled to wear  the badge.  Her  claim  
 to  that  rank  dated  from  17  Nov.  1558,  when  Mary  of  
 England died.  Her right to the  arms of  the  Dauphin ceased,  
 when  her  husband  became  king  of  France  in  July,  1559.  
 Between  these periods  this piece  seems to have been issued. 
 7.  M a r y ,   Q u e e n   o f   S c o t s .   C o u n t e r .   1558. 
 Shield  of  France  and  Dauphine  quartering  Scotland  and  
 impaled  with  Scotland,  both  dimidiated;  above,  crown.  Leg.  
 m .  d   .  g  .  s c o t  . r   .  d e l p h i n a   . v i e n .   (Mary, by the  grace  of God,  
 Queen  of  Scots, Dauphiness of Vienne.) 
 Rev.  The  Greek letters  <t>. M.  (F. M.)  in monogram  under  
 the  Scottish  crown;  on  each  side,  a  thistle  crowned.  Leg. 
 +   IN  .  MY  .  DEFENS  .  GOD  .  MY  .  DEFFEND.  Stops,  lozenges. 
 1-2.  Num.  Chron. N.S. XVII. PI.  ii.  2. 
 MB,  electrotype  from  M.  Preux,  M.  Bibl.  Paris,  At. 
 Very rare. 
 This counter is of  French work  and  was  probably issued  in  
 commemoration  of  the  marriage  of  Francis and Mary.  The  
 monogram was  a  favourite  one of Mary.  It  is  on  her  handbell  
 preserved  at  Kennet,  and  also  on  her  signet-ring  in  the  
 British Museum.  (See Num.  Chron. N.S. XVH.  64.) 
 8.  F r a n c i s   H.  a n d   M a r y .   C o u n t e r .   1559. 
 Shield of Dauphiné and Scotland quarterly, crowned, within the  
 collar of  St. Michael.  Leg.  f r a n c i s c v s   : e t   : m a r i a  .  r e x  :  k e g i . 
 Rev.  Sword,  crowned,  a  scroll  across  inscribed,  v n v s   n o n   
 s v f f i c i t  . o r b i s .   (One world is not  enough.)  Leg.  s c o to r v m   :  
 d e l p h i n v s   :  VIENIS  :  1559.  (Francis  and  Mary,  King  and  
 Queen of  Scots, Dauphin of Vienne.) 
 1-1.  Anderson, Thes.  clxiv.  12.  Cotton. MSS., Tib. D. II. 
 Although  figured  by Anderson  and  in  the Cotton. MSS. in  
 the  British  Museum,  no  specimen of  this  counter  is  known.  
 It  probably existed in the  Sutherland cabinet,  but it was not in  
 that  collection  when it came into the possession of  the  Society  
 of  Antiquaries of  Scotland.  De  Bie  (Tab.  61)  gives a similar  
 one, with  different  obverse  and  with  two  orbs on the reverse,  
 which he supposes to refer to the marriage of Francis and Mary  
 and  to  have been struck on that occasion.  Anderson supposes  
 the  date  to  fix it to some later event,  and that it conveys some  
 allusion  to  Mary’s  claim  upon the crown  of  England,  looking