
 
        
         
		work.  The series of medals issued by the Society for Promoting  
 Arts  and  Commerce,  to  commemorate  remarkable  contemporary  
 occurrences,  was another  attempt to  revive medallic  art  
 in  this country.  In this the  Society achieved  a  certain amount  
 of  success, which  was  principally  due  to  the  energies  of  the  
 antiquary  Mr.  Thomas  Hollis,  who  appears  to  have  spared  
 himself  no  labour  in  conceiving  and  working  out, with  the  
 aid  of  eminent  artists,  the  various  designs  for  these  pieces.  
 Laurence  Natter,  so  famous  as  a  gem-engraver,  shone  but  
 little  as  a medallist,  and  the works  of  Richard Yeo, who made  
 the best of the Culloden medals,  of Thomas Pingo, who  worked  
 under  the  auspices  of  the  Society  for  Promoting  Arts  and  
 Commerce,  and  of  John  Kirk,  all fall  short both in execution  
 and  design  of the medals issued half  a century before. 
 With this ends the  scope  of  our  work,  but  it  may  be  well  
 to  add  a few  words about the  artists  of more recent times;  as  
 some  of  their medals are  described  when  they  relate to events  
 or  persons  of  an  earlier  period.  Subsequent  to  1760  there  
 are,  besides a large  series  of  historical medals,  a  vast  number  
 of  portrait-medals,  school-prizes,  medals  of  learned  societies,  
 temperance  societies,  and  political  and other medalets.  Their  
 number is in fact  so  great  that  they  are  double  those  of  all  
 previous  periods  put  together.  With  this great  supply,  the  
 artistic decadence  noticeable  in the first half of the last century  
 becomes  even  more marked during the  second half;  insomuch  
 that  there  are  very  few  if  any  medallists who  may be  said  to  
 have  excelled  in  their  art.  To  what  causes  this  decadence  
 may  be  attributed, it  would  be  difficult  to  say,  but one fact  is  
 apparent,  that  it  was  not  confined  to  this  country,  but  was  
 general throughout Europe.  Of  the medallists of  the reign  of  
 George  III., whose  names may be  found in  this  work,  are the  
 Westwoods,  uncle  and  nephew,  Gosset, Mills,  Parkes,  Tassie,  
 &c.  A  few  foreigners  came  to  England  during  that  period,  
 but most of them entered the  service  of Matthew Boulton, who  
 had  set up his mint at  Soho. 
 Medallic art  in  England  during  the  present  century  owes  
 much  to  the  works  of  Pistrucci,  and  of  the  Wyon  family.  
 Pistrucci,  born  at  Rome,  came  to  England  in  1815,  and  remained  
 here till  his  death in  1855.  To him  we  are  indebted  
 for the famous Waterloo medal,  for many private  and  academical  
 medals,  and  for  some of  our finest coin-dies.  The family  
 of  the Wyons,  who may be  said to have  occupied  in  the  present  
 century  the  place  in medallic  art taken  by  the  Roettiers  
 in  the  seventeenth  century,  have  held  the  post  of  Engravers  
 to  the  Mint  since the  resignation  of  that  office  by  Pistrucci  
 in  1828,  and  also  that  of  Chief  Engravers  to  the  Office  of  
 Seals  from  about  1816.  In  virtue  of  these  offices  they  have  
 executed  a  large  series  of medals  and  seals,  and  the  greater  
 portion of  the dies  for the English  coinage.