
 
        
         
		One  large  ship  near,  sailing  with  a  side  wind.  Ex.  pko   . 
 TALIBVS  .  AYSIS. 
 2-2.  Med. Hist.  obv.  xxxi.  1,  rev.  xxix.  5. 
 MB. At. 
 In  the  list of medals  by Roettier  (Stuart Papers, Windsor),  
 it  is  stated:  “ This  lesser  [medal]  was designed to  he given to  
 persons  under the  rank of  Captains, who  had signalized themselves  
 in  actions at sea.” 
 141.  N aval  R ew a r d .  1665. 
 Bust  of  Charles  II.,  r.,  laureate,  hair  long,  no  drapery. 
 Leg.  CABOLVS  .  SECVNDVS  .  DEI  .  GRATIA  .  MAG  .  BRI  .  FRAN  . E T   . 
 h i b   .  r e x .   m. m.  Cross. 
 Rev.  Charles II.,  habited as  a Roman  general, &c. ;  same  as  
 the preceding. 
 2*2.  Med. Hist. xxix.  5.  Evelyn,  136. 
 MB. At. 
 These  varieties  of  the  same  medal  were  struck  by  John  
 Roettier,  at  the  same  time,  and  for  the  same  purpose  as  
 No.  139.  The  dies  are  in  the  British Museum.  As there is  
 a  diiferenee  in  the  workmanship  of  these  medals,  it  is  very  
 possible  that  Roettier  received  some  assistance  from  one  at  
 least of  his brothers. 
 142.  D u k e   o f   Y o r k .  N aval  A c t io n .  1665. 
 Bust  of  the  Duke  of  York,  r.,  hair  long,  flowing  over  the  
 right breast,  in  armour  and ample mantle round the  shoulders.  
 Leg.  iacobvs  .  dvx  .  e b o r   .  fit  .  alban  .  dom  .  magn  .  a dm i-  
 r a l lv s   . an g l u e   . &c.  (James, Duke of York and Albany, Lord  
 High  Admiral  of  England,  &c.)  Below,  Jioetti.  <F.  (John  
 Roettier fecit.) 
 Rev.  Naval  engagement,  one  ship  in  front,  hearing  the  
 Admiral’s  flag  and  the  Royal  standard.  Leg.  n e c   m in o r   in   
 t e r r i s .  (Nor less on land.—Virg. Aen. v.  803.)  Ex.  3 .  iv n i i   .  
 1665. 
 3.  Med. Hist. xxix. 2.  Van Loon, II. 505.  Evelyn, 145. 
 MB. At.  Athole, At.  Bibl. Paris, At.  Rare. 
 This  exceedingly fine  medal  by John Roettier was  struck in  
 honour of the Duke of York,  afterwards  James II.,  who greatly  
 distinguished himself  in  this  decisive victory,  in  which he was  
 commander-in-chief.  This  was  the  most  signal  victory  the  
 English  had  ever  yet gained,  and  the  most  mortifying  defeat  
 to the  Dutch.  The  legend  intimates  that  James  had  distinguished  
 himself  on  land  as  much  as  he was  acknowledged to  
 have  done  upon  this  memorable  occasion  at sea.  The dies of  
 this medal are in the British Museum. 
 143.  D u k e   o f   Y o r k .  N aval  A c t io n .  1665. 
 Bust  of  the  Duke  of  York,  r.,  hair  short,  neck  bare,  in  
 armour  and  mantle fastened with  brooch  on the  left shoulder.  
 Leg.  iacobvs  .  dvx  .  e b o r   .  e t   .  alban  .  f r a t e r   .  a v g v st is s   .  
 ca ro l i  .  ii  .  r e g i s .  (James, Duke  of York  and Albany,  brother  
 of  the  most  august  King  Charles  II.)  On truncation, monogram, 
  A.  (John Roettier.) 
 Rev.  An  antique  trophy;  distant  naval  engagement.  Leg.  
 g en v s   ,  a n t iq w m .  (An ancient race.—Virg. Aen. vi.  648.) 
 2-5.  Med. Hist.  xxix.  4.  Yan  Loon,  II.  505.  Evelyn,  
 146.  Kohler,  Y.  9. 
 MB. At.  Bodley, At.  Bibl.  Paris, At.  Rare. 
 This  is  another  complimentary medal to the Duke of York,  
 by  John  Roettier, without  date,  but  struck  in  honour of  the  
 great naval victory of  3  June,  1665.  The  die of  the  reverse is  
 in the British Museum.  Neither  device nor legend supply the  
 want of  an  expressed  date.  It  was  used  as  a  naval  reward.  
 In the list of  medals  by Roettier  (Stuart Papers, Windsor),  in  
 describing  this  one,  it  is  stated  of  the  legend  on  the obverse,  
 “ This was the first inscription  indeed,  but  the  letters were  (at  
 his  accession  to  the  crown  when  there  was  not  time  enough  
 to  make  a  new  medal)  erased,  and  a  new  inscription  made,  
 Jacobus  Secundus  D.  G. M.  R. F.  et  Hib. Rex."  The medal  
 referred to is  described at No.  28,  p.  616,  but the inscription is  
 not as given by Roettier.