
 
        
         
		y S>ö t  1742  ] 
 Co n f e r v a   diaphana. 
 Iied-dotted  Conferva. 
 CRYPTOGAMIA  Algae, 
 Ó en.  Char.  Seeds  produced  within  the  substance  of  
 the  capillary  or jointed  frond,  or  in  closed  tubercles  
 united with  it. 
 Spec.  Ch a r .  Red,  capillary,  repeatedly  forked,  divaricated  
 ;  the  ultimate divisions  like a pair of forceps.  
 Joints  short,  pellucid,  deep  red  at  each  end.  Capsules  
 lateral,  solitary,  globose. 
 S yn.  Conferva  diaphana.  L ig h tf  9 9 6 .  Huds,  653.  
 With.  v.  4.  ] 39.  Hull.  3 34 .  Dillw.  Conf.  t.  38.  
 Dicks,  H .  Siec.fasc.  18.  2 5. 
 C.  nodulosa.  Huds.  60 0. 
 C.  marina  nodosa  lubrica,  ramosissima  et  elegantis-  
 sima rubens.  Zy7/. Muse.  3 5 .  t.  7. ƒ.  4 0 .  R ail Syn.  
 6 2.  t.  2. ƒ .  3.  Turn,  T r.  o f L . Soc.  v.  7.  108. 
 RECEIVED  from  the  Sussex  coast,  by  favour  of  Miss  
 Biddulph,  in November last.  It  is  frequently  found  in  rocky  
 or  pebbly  basons  on  the  shore,  or  growing;  upon  the  larger  
 marine  plants.  '  ~  1  & 
 Nothing  can be  more  elegant  than  this  species.  Its  whole  
 stem  and  branches  are  finer  than  hair,  repeatedly forked  and  
 regularly  divaricated,  each  branch  terminating  in  a  pair  of  
 short  incurved  points  like  pincers.  ,  The  joints  are  usually  
 twice  as  broad as  long,  but  in  some-  branches  as  much  the  
 reverse,  pellucid,  shining, and almost colourless, except at each  
 end,  where  the  partitions  are  placed,  in  which  part  is  a  ring  
 of deep  red,  so  that the plant  laid on paper  looks,  as Lightfoot  
 says,  like  “  a branched  series  of small  red  dots.”  The  seeds  
 are in lateral,  solitary,  sessile, globular,  red  capsules,  sparingly  
 produced. 
 The  Dillenian  synonym  stands  on  the  irrefragable  authority  
 of Mr. Turner,  nor  could  any  less  authority uphold  it,  because  
 nobody  conversant with  the  usual  merit  of  Dillenius-would  
 suppose  he  could  draw  so  bad  a  figure,  and  still  less  that  he  
 could  be  so  partial  to what  he  had  done  as  to  repeat  it  in  his  
 edition  of Ray.  We  hence  learn  however,  what  Hudson did  
 not  discover  when  he  copied  Lightfoot’s  C.  diaphana,  that  
 it  is  his  own  nodulosa,  a  species  that  would  seem  merely  
 adopted  from  Dillenius,  had  not Hudson  alone  described  its  
 fruit. 
 1 7 4 2 tPSSS&t rfj?  r 
 i-'\  /   1 v  .... 
 \   I If >■ 
 zzS o7.7hi/L -7i’,7  b y  ,7a  fS a n a b y ^