
 
		86 NORTHERN  ZOOLOGY. 
 [23.]  6.  Strix (Bubo) Arctica.  (Swainson.) . Arctic or White Homed  Owl. 
 Ge n u s .  Strix.  L in n .  Sub-genus.  Bubo.  Cu v ie r . 
 Sp . C h .  St r ix  (Bubo) a r c t ic a ,  alba super hie illic brunnescens lineis crebris Iransversis nigrescentibus undulata,  
 suiter  Candida: jugulo  abdomine  tectricibus  alarum  intemis pedibusque  intactis;  gutture  pec tore  hypochondriisque  
 fasciatis. 
 Sp . Ch .  A r c t ic  or W h it e   H o r n e d   Ow l,  w hite,  tinged  here  and there on the dorsal aspect w ith brown,  and  
 marked w ith crowded transverse blackish-brown bars and lines;  under plumage having a brilliant white ground colour,  
 unspotted on the fore part of the neck, belly, under wing coverts, and fe e t;  banded on the throat, breast, and flanks. 
 P late  x x x ii. 
 This very beautiful Owl appears  to  be rare,  only one  specimen  having  been  
 seen by the  members  of the Expedition.  It was  observed flying  at mid-day in  
 the  immediate vicinity of Carlton  House,  and was brought  down with an arrow  
 by an Indian boy.  I obtained no information respecting its habits. 
 The  only species  mentioned  by systematic writers  that  resembles  this bird is  
 the Strix Scandiaca, which Linnaeus,  according to Pennant, described solely from  
 a painting of Rudbeck’s.  The same author mentions,  however,  that its existence  
 was confirmed by Mr. Tonning, of Drontheim;  yet Temminck considers it to have  
 been merely a young Snowy Owl,  on which two fictitious egrets had been placed.  
 The discovery of our species renders the existence of the Scandinavian Eared Owl  
 more probable;  but the descriptions handed down to us of the latter are so imperfect, 
  that it can be considered only in the light of a nominal species until specimens  
 of it are obtained.  Wilson  mentions  a  “ White  Owl,”  supposed  to  be  a  variety  
 of Strix  Virginiana,  as  having been  seen  in  the  United  States;  but,  no  
 details  being given,  it  cannot  now  be  ascertained whether  it was  our bird  or  
 not *.-^R. 
 In this remarkable species the facial disk  is very imperfect;  the ears small and  
 without  an  operculum,  as  in Strix  Virginiana ; the ear feathers ample;  but the  
 disk even smaller than in the last-mentioned bird,  and the tarsi somewhat longer.  
 The toes are similarly connected.  The tail is of moderate length, and considerably  
 rounded.  The bill is strong, and rather short.—Sw. 
 *  The Wapacuthu Owl of Pennant and Latham, a Hudson’s Bay bird,  resembles our White Horned Owl considerably  
 in the colours of its plumage,  but differs essentially in the want of egrets,  which in our bird are long and highly  
 developed.  Neither Pennant nor Latham appear to have seen the Wapacuthu,  their descriptions corresponding word  
 for word with Mr. Hutchins’s manuscript notes.  The Indian word Wapacuthu means “ White Owl,”  and is applied  
 also to the Strix nyctea,  although the common  term for the latter is  Wapo-ohoo.  Mr. Hutchins says the Wapacuthu  
 is an inhabitant of the woods, makes its nest in the moss on dry ground,  and lays from five to ten white eggs in May.  
 The young fly in June,  and are entirely white for some time afterwards.  The Wapacuthu preys  on  mice  and  small  
 birds, which it generally kills for itself.  The Expedition did not pass near Severn River, where Mr. Hutchins resided.