
 
		forms  of the Merulidce,  as  Timalia and  Megalurus,  have  been  considered true  
 Sylviadoe,  either by MM. Temminck,  Horsfield,  or Vigors ;  that one of the principal  
 genera among the Sylviadoe has been mistaken by the latter  gentleman  for  
 a group belonging to the Ampelidoe ;  and,  finally,  that the Todidoe are so closely  
 united with the Tyrant Shrikes,  by means of such genera as Fluvicola and  N en-  
 getus, that not only Linnæus, but every subsequent writer of his school, has placed  
 the latter with the genus Lanius. These families,  uniting at their  extremities,  present, in their  typical  structure  
 and organization,  the following  indisputable  analogies to the five leading tribes  
 of Insessorial birds :— 
 Tribes. 
 DentirostresJ 
 Analogies. 
 Bill  furnished  with  a  strong  tooth ;  claws,  
 slender, strong, very acute :  carnivorous  or  
 insectivorous. 
 r  Bill more lengthened,  arched from the  base;  
 Conirostres.  J  feet  robust,  adapted  either  for  walking, 
 .  . perching, or climbing:  omnivorous.  
 r  Notch of the bill either wanting or very slightly  
 Scansores.  J  developed.  Climb among trees to seek their  
 t  food.  Insectivorous. 
 Families.  
 Laniadoe, 
 Merulidce. 
 Sylviadoe. 
 Tenuirostres.  Feet very short.  Nectarivorous or frugivorous. 
 FissirostresI Rictus wide or bristled ;  feed upon the wing  
 feet very weak.  Insectivorous. ‘ 1 
 Ampelidoe. 
 Todidoe. 
 It may be further remarked,  that the most perfectly organized birds are among  
 the Merulidae and the Conirostres;  that the faculty of climbing and searching the  
 most intricate  ramifications of trees for their food is  confined,  among the Denti-  
 rostres,  to the  Sylviadae,  where  there  is  a general tendency to  the  scansorial  
 structure,  even  in  the  most  typical  groups;  so  close,  indeed,  is  the  analogy  
 between  these  birds and the slender-billed creepers,  that this  relation has  been  
 mistaken  by all  naturalists  for one of absolute  affinity.  The parallel between  
 the  two  next  groups at first sight is less  apparent,  but it is no less curious and  
 beautiful:  both  derive their  sustenance almost entirely from the vegetable kingdom  
 ;  but the Tenuirostres feed chiefly from flowers, while the Ampelidae are supported  
 by fruits.  Lastly,  the  Todidse  agree with the Fissirostres  in the  feeble  
 organization of their  feet;  the  breadth and depression  of their bill;  and, more 
 especially,  in  that particular habit  of seizing their food,  which consists  alone of  
 insects,  during flight. 
 The  above  results  will,  however,  be  rendered more  intelligible  by  a closer  
 analysis of the families themselves; for which purpose we shall commence with the 
 l a n ia d a :, 
 as  being  the  typical  group  first, on the  list of M. Cuvier’s  Dentirostres.  We  
 commenced a partial  investigation of this  family several  years  ago,  and  dwelt,  
 at some length,  u p o n   those forms which appeared to  enter  within  three  of the  
 principal groups ;  namely,  the Lammas,  the  Thmnnophilinw,  and the Edoliance.  Ignorant of the views which  another  gentleman  had taken  of these  birds,  and  
 whose paper had been previously read before the Linnean Society, we were somewhat  
 surprised  at being told  that our observations,  if founded  in  nature,  were  
 calculated  to  overthrow  the whole  series  of affinities  therein  stated;  while,  if  
 incorrect,  we should be  exposing the fallacy of that system we had adopted.  By  
 the subsequent appearance of the paper in question, we immediately perceived our  
 own views were not in unison with those of the writer.  Yet, as we had conducted  
 our investigation by analysis,  so we could not be fully persuaded that the results  
 were false,  without  giving to the subject a much closer investigation than it had  
 yet received.  In  such researches,  merely to oppose  synthesis to synthesis would  
 have been very little to the purpose;  because, by such a principle of combination,  
 the most remote families  may be  made to appear conterminous,  and we  might  
 have, as an anonymous writer somewhat ludicrously contends for, “ as many natural  
 methods as there are organs."  With the hope,  therefore,  of discovering the true  
 series  among the Laniadac,  we were  compelled to have  recourse again  to  analysis, 
   and to extend this mode of investigation to every group of the entire order  
 of Insessores.  If, then, after five years devoted to this research,  we finally retain  
 our first impressions, we feel that neither time nor mature consideration have been  
 spared to arrive at truth :  the only object we have been desirous of attaining.  That  
 perfection of knowledge which time alone unfolds, will probably dispel many doubts  
 and  difficulties which are not yet solved or surmounted;  or  may,  possibly, place  
 the very facts upon which our present views are founded, in a new and unexpected  
 light.  But,  until that  period arrives, we feel persuaded that nothing yet  known  militates, in an essential degree,  against the general opinions on natural arrangement  
 that we have adopted.  In the progress of this work, we shall endeavour to  
 demonstrate the correctness of these views by a series of facts, as new as they are  
 extraordinary,  and by  submitting  them  to  tests which  have never  yet been so  
 rigorously applied to any system.