ROBES' OF THOMAS BECKET.
Boeket, he continued to be
commemorated iri<;_a^ü&xedl'ar*‘ >mannér in all the
have residid, ’or which
(1 everV' .>■
article which had belonged to liirn was
1' The’ \
error, or the zeal, of his admirers, no
j^reVjffîwKByfi:?im a o A h o. |
hiitnV thing^vfeHgB
had no claim to the honour, uudffiHHH
niM bi- (
finViif" v’hieh tüh1 theI
robes of
W Ê È
MflMH
| | g § | | §
p S g ^H
P s u j
g B lf lH
jjp&ijybrtion of the rolxfe'F^^esetifbd in our plate is what was
called the Apparel of ihp Âû&re Æflpqj Am il elfcw i~. ^ ‘nifec^M
fiteglinen, in form óf, an Mmn’g s o the
sh&uMers. It was iStFrydnèed' ■ jn the eighifflp;nturv, to ^ f f l^ tliéj
m m bare. Tlio
part of jthe amice, which l & u s u a i c l i -a manner^
