
 
		V.  filiformis.  Johnst. FI.  Berw, 225,  with  figure.  
 Hook.  Brit.  FI.  ed.  1.  6.  DeCand.  FI.  Fr.  
 v.  5.  388. 
 V. byzantiaca.  Sibth. MSS. (according to Smith.)  
 V.  arvensis (3.  Sm. FI.  Grrec.  6. t.  8.  Hook. Brit.  
 FI.  ed. 2.  8. 
 V.  flosculis oblongis  pediculis insidentibus,  chamae-  
 dryos folio, major.  Buxb.  Cent.  1.26.  t, 40.f . 2. 
 T h i s  is the  Veronica mentioned by the name of  V. per-  
 sica under  V. agrestis,  2603.  It  seems  doubtful  whether  
 it is altogether of Eastern  origin,  or  a genuine  native  of  
 some of those countries of continental Europe, in the Floras  
 of which  it  has recently found a place.  It was  first  published  
 as British in  1829, in  the  interesting  Flora o f Berwick 
 upon-Tweed,  and  soon  after  in  the British  Flora  of  
 Professor Hooker:  but, as the Berwickshire station is fC in  
 the shrubbery  in front of the house at Whiterig,”  and  as  
 the idea that the plant had been found  wild  in Sussex  was  
 founded  on  misapprehension,  the  grounds  are extremely  
 slight upon which it has been reckoned among our  natives.  
 Nor  is its claim  to  admission  much  strengthened  by Mr.  
 Berkeley’s  discovery  of it,  growing  luxuriantly, but  sparingly, 
  in  a  clover-field,  which  had  been  laid  down  with  
 foreign seed, at Chalk Hole, about two miles from Margate ;  
 nor by its occurring in plenty among turnips in different parts  
 of a field adjoining the Bird-in-hand Inn, at Burford in Oxfordshire, 
  where our specimens were gathered, December 2,  
 1832.  Seeding abundantly, it readily establishes itself where  
 once  introduced;  and, like many other annuals, it is to be  
 found in flower throughout the  year, whenever  the season  
 is tolerably mild.  The blossoms expandonly in fine weather. 
 The filiform procumbent  stems, into which the  plant  is  
 divided immediately above the fibrous root,  are  simple,  or  
 produce branches from a few of the lower joints only. They  
 often throw  out roots from their lower part, and attain the  
 length of two feet or more, as the flowering goes on.  The  
 general habit is very similar to that of  V.  agrestis, and  the  
 nature and distribution of the  pubescence is the same;  but  
 the plant is larger,  and  rather  more hairy, and the  divaricated  
 lobes of the capsule, compressed upwards and sharply  
 carinate,  afford  so  decided  a  specific  character,  that  we  
 cannot concur with  the  high  authorities  who  regard it  as  
 a mere variety.  The calyx-segments also are more  acute  
 than in  V. agrestis,  and the corolla much  larger,  rivalling  
 in size and beauty that of V. Chamcedrys.  The leaves are  
 green, not glaucescent,  opposite in the lower,  alternate in  
 the flowering part  of the stems.  They vary in proportion  
 of length to width, and in the size of the crenatures, which  
 ai'e  occasionally double,  and sometimes  so  deep as to  approach  
 to the nature of lobes.  The capsule becomes  reticulated  
 in drying. 
 Mertens  and  Koch  have distinguished  a  larger- and  a  
 smaller-leaved variety, regarding the latter,  in  which  the  
 flower-stalks are longer  than  the leaves,  as  probably  the  
 true  V. filiformis of Smith,  and the former as the  V. persica  
 of authors.  In our gardens, where the plant is naturalized,  
 these  two  forms  are  produced  evidently  by difference  of  
 exposure and of soil.  The true  V.filiformis,  however,  is  
 probably distinct.  Two  authentic specimens  exist  in  the  
 Smithian  Herbarium;  one  inscribed,  “ Tournefort  ex  
 oriente” ;  the  other,  “ Chev.  de  Steven.”  These exhibit  
 the characters pointed out by Bieberstein,—a capsule with  
 rounded (not  divaricated) lobes,  and  a  somewhat  longer  
 style;  and  they further  differ  from  V. Buxbaumii, by  ob