
 
		showy,  perhaps, than in any other of our wild Roses.  The  
 styles are  scarcely  protruded,  slightly hairy.  The fruit is  
 bright  scarlet,  pulpy when  ripe,  and  loses  early the  segments  
 of the calyx. 
 Such is the plant we have figured, R. collina /S. of Woods,  
 R . Forsteri a.  of Smith, as it occurs, not very frequently, in  
 hedges and thickets in Sussex.  It is in itself of very peculiar  
 aspect;  but we find various gradations  between it and  
 R . dumetorum.  Of these,  R. collina y.  of Woods is a more  
 common and considerably dissimilar  briar, much more like  
 R . canina,  &c.  in  habit,  its  branches  being  longer,  slender, 
   and arched.  Its leaflets  are  mostly  7,  smaller,  more  
 elliptical, less crowded,  not glaucous,  but of a pale green,  
 not unlike that of the Sweet Briar,  and, as in that also, they  
 are often remarkably concave. The serratures are frequently  
 almost double ;  and a few  glands are scattered on the leafstalks, 
  which  are often without  prickles.  Hairs are  sometimes  
 found on the upper surface of the leaflets, as in R. dumetorum, 
   and the  flower-stalks  are  occasionally  beset with  
 soft hairs, more  rarely with feeble  setae.  We  have  specimens  
 of this  from  continental  botanists  as  R .  collina  of  
 Jacquin. 
 Whether  Jacquin’s  Rose  just  mentioned  be  really  a  
 different  species  or  not,  we  cannot  pretend  to  decide  between  
 the  late  Sir  J.  E.  Smith  and  Mr.  Woods,  who  
 came to opposite conclusions  from  the consideration  of the  
 same  authentic  specimen.  The  figure  in  the  Flora Aus-  
 triaca  would  lead  us  to  regard  it,  with  Mr. Woods,  as  
 differing  from  our  first  variety  only  by  the  setae  on  the  
 flower-stalks, a character now known  to  be  of no  importance. 
   A plant  sent by the  younger Jacquin  to the garden  
 of the Horticultural Society, is most like a luxuriant variety  
 of R.  dumetorum ;  although its leaves,  which  are not glaucous, 
   have hairs on the under surface only.  With R.  brac-  
 tescens of Woods we hope to become better acquainted. 
 R .  collina  of Engl. Bot.  t.  1895, is  now generally known  
 as  R . systyla;  but it is not,  according to later information  
 acquired  by Mr. Woods,  the  plant originally so named  by  
 Bastard.—W. B.