
 
		mens  imperfectly  crystallized.  From  the analysis  of Professor Afzelius  
 it appears to  be very  impure.  Two specimens which he analysed were  
 composed  as  follows  : 
 flint orten.  Stockenstrom. 
 Sulphate of barytes  79  ......... . 66 
 Sulphate  of  lime      6  ............  1.5 
 Silica     ....................   3  . . . . . .   lo 
 Alumina and  oxide  of iron  4  .............13 
 Water    ......................   1 *5. . . . . .   0*5 
 93'5  9 1 
 '  5 .  Mica.  It  occurs  only  in  small scales,  and  in  no  great  quantity. 
 6 .  Serpentine.  It  occurs  likewise  in  small  quantity.  Its  usual  colours  
 are yellow,  and  various shades  o f  green. 
 7 .  Chlorite.  In  rathe'r greater abundance.  Crystals  o f  garnets  are  
 found in  it. 
 8.  Salite.  This  is a mineral which was first particularised by D’An-  
 drada,  who  observed  it in Sala mine.  Since that  time it  has been  observed  
 at  Fahlun,  and in various  other  parts  of  Sweden,  and  I am  informed  
 also in Norway.  Haiiy  remarked  the  near  resemblance  which  
 it bore  to augite  in the  form  of  its crystal,  and  of late,  in  consequence  
 of more  mature  reflection,  and  a  more  extensive examination  of  the  
 crystals  o f  both,  he  has  united it  to  augite,  and considers  both  as only  
 constituting  one  species.  However,  the  difference  between  the  characters  
 o f  salite  and  augite  is  so  great,  that at least  as  long as  the Wernerian  
 method  of  arrangement  continues  to. prevail,  they will  be  separately  
 classed and  described. 
 The variety  of  salite  discovered  in  Norway got  the  name  of mala-  
 colite,  from Abilgaard;  and  this name  seems to  have been  adopted by  
 Haiiy. 
 The colour of  salite is  light  greenish  grey.  It  occurs massive;  but  
 in  almost  all  the  specimens  which  I  saw  at  Sala,  to  the  number,  I  
 should suppose, of about  loo, a tendency to crystallization could always  
 be perceived,  and a distinct prism may  be  extracted with smooth  faces. 
 This prism,  which may be  considered as  the  primitive  form  o f  salite,  
 appeared  exactly  thé  same  with  the  primitive  crystal  of  augite,  as  far  
 as it was possible to judge by the eye,  for  I  had no means  o f  measuring  
 the  angles  with  accuracy ;  that  is  to  say,  a  rhomboidal prism,  which  
 by the eye can hardly be distinguished from a  rectangular parallelopiped,  
 the  angles not differing much more than two degrees from  right angles.  
 I  speak  from memory, not having  at  hand any crystals o f salite to make  
 the measurement,  nor having  it  in  my  power  to  consult Haüy’s  dissertation  
 on. the  subject,  in which he  has given the  result of his  own measurement. 
 The  fracture  of  salite  is distinctly  foliated and a  threefold  cleavage,  
 corresponding  to  the  sides  of the  rhomboidal  prism,  may  be  perceived.  
 It  is  translucent  on  the  edges.  It  does  not  strike  fire  with  steel;  but  
 is  capable  of  scratching  glass.  It  is  brittle,  and  its  specific  gravity,  
 according  to  the  experiments  of D’Andrada,  is  3 *2368.  Before  the  
 blow-pipe  it melts  into a  transparent  glass.  The  only analysis  of  this  
 mineral,  with which  I am  acquainted,  is  that o f  Laugier,  which  is as 
 follows I 
 Silica.......................................................   53 
 Lime,.  ......... . . . . . .   20 
 Magnesia      .................             19 
 Alumina . . .     ...........            3 
 Oxide  of manganese.  ...........   .4 
 Loss    .........................  I 
 100 
 This  corresponds very  nearly  to  the  constituents  found  in  augite  by  
 the  latest  and most accurate  analyses,  with  this  difference,  that  augite  
 contains  at  least  12  per  cent,  of  oxide  of  iron which  is wanting  altogether  
 in  salite.  Whether  the constant presènce  óf such a  constituent,  
 in  defiance; of  a  similar  crystallization,  be  sufficient  to  constitute  a peculiar  
 species;  or whether  the  crystalline  forms o f salite and  augite  be  
 absolutely  identic,  are  questions  that  would  require some  consideration  
 before  two minerals,  so different  in their general aspect,  are confounded  
 together  under  the-same name. ■