
 
        
         
		Of fhe  AidUiil, which  ih is  species  is  said  to  be  called  in  
 Greenland, wonderful  stories are  told :  the  following is  not  
 the  most  extraordinary.  “ Where  these  appear  all  the  
 seals  disappear,  else  they make  desperate slaughter among  
 them,  for  they  have  such  sagacity  and  skill  in  catching  
 them with  the m outh and  fins,  th a t  they are sometimes seen  
 loaded with  five  a t  a  time,  one  in  th e mouth,  a  couple  u n der  
 each fin  and one under th e  back  fin.”— Crantz, Greenla 
 n d ,  116. 
 Sibbald  describes  the  comparatively  small  triangular  
 dorsal  to  b e   erect,  like  a  “ Mizara  mast,”  which  Artedi  
 and  Linnæus  translate p in n a   allissima,  and  caused  Shaw  
 to  call  it  the High-finned Cachalot.  Dr.  Fleming by mistake  
 calls th is  species  the  Spermaceti Wh a le  (Brit.  A.  88);  
 and  he  refers  to  P.  macrocephalns  (lann.),  as  th e   true  
 Sperm Wha le  figured  by  Robertson.  Sibbald,  in  speaking  
 o f  another  specimen,  says,  “spinam  dorso  lo n g a v if  
 as  correctly  quoted  by Artedi  and  Linnæus,  b u t used  by  
 them  in  opposition to  the  altissima  o f  th e ir  other species. 
 Colnelt  (Voy.  S.  Pacific)  speaks  o f  innumerable  shoals  
 of Black-fish  on  the  shores  of California. 
 Mr. Wai-wick  informs  me  th a t  there  is  a  stuffed  specimen  
 o f  th is  Whale  perambulating  this  country  in  three  
 caravans ;  unfortunately  1  have never h ad   the  opportunity  
 o f seeing it. 
 Th ere  is an  etching o f  Van  den Veld,  o f  a  “ P o t Wal-  
 wesk  op Noortwijek  op  Zee,  28 Dec.  1614,” which  I  think  
 represents  this  species. 
 In   th e  Catalogue  of  the  Museum  o f  the College  o f S urgeons  
 th e   trunca ted Whales’  teeth  are  called  “ the  teeth  of  
 the High-finned  Cachalot, P.  Tursio ? ”  p.  171, n.  1189—  
 1194.  And  the  small jaws  of the  S penn Wha le  are called  
 “ the Lesser Cachalot  (Physeter  Catodon,  l.\n n .)"  Duhamel  
 (Pech.  iv.  t.  9,  f.  2)  figured  a whale  from  the  “ River  
 G a b o n ”  in Guinea,  with  teeth  in  th e  lower jaw,  a   dorsal  
 on  the  hinder p a rt  of  th e   back,  and  the  blowers  in  the  
 crown,  as  in  this  genus ;  b u t  the  jaws  are  equal,  and  tlie  
 mouth  b e n t up  a t the  angles  to  the  eyes.  H<!  says  I t   IS 
 called  Grampus  by   the  English. 
 Fam.  3 .  D e l p h in id æ .  D o l p h in s . 
 H e ad  moderate.  Tee th  in  both  jaws,  rarely mdimen-  
 tary  and  early  deciduous.  Blowers u nited  together,  opening  
 in  a  single  transverse  or  lunate  opening  on the crown  
 o f th e  head. 
 Th is   family  is  easily  known  from  th e   Toothed  Whales,  
 or  Catodontidæ,  by   th e   smaller  and  more  proportionate  
 head ;  and  in  those  species  wliich  have  lost  their  upper  
 tee th  a t  an  early  age,  by  there  being  no  regula.r series of  
 p its  in  the  gum  o f  th e  u pper  jaw   for the  reception  of  the  
 tee th  o f  the low'er one :  and  also hy  th e  h in d er p a rt of the  
 skull  n o t  being  deeply  concave,  and  surrounded  on  the  
 sides  and behind by  a  high  ridge. 
 These  animals when  first  born  are  large  compared  with  
 the  size  o f the  parents,  (according  to  Dr.  Knox, th e  foetus  
 o f  the porpesse  is  half  th e  length,  th a t is,  one  fourth  the  
 size  of the  p arent  before  it   is  born,  Trans.  Roy.  Soc. E d . 
 ii.  208) ;  and  they  appear  to  attain  Ibeir  full size  very  rapidly, 
  which  may  account for th e  very  slight  difference  to  
 be  observed  in  th e  size  o f  th e  skull,  and  the  great uniformity  
 in  the  number,  and  in  the  space which  the  series  of  
 tee th  occupy  upon  tbe  edge  of  the jaw s  in  different  specimens  
 o f the  same species.  H u n te r thought th e  ex a ct numb 
 e r  o f  tee th  in  any  species  was  uncertain ;  observing the  
 tee th  in  tho  middle  o f  each  series  w'cre  the  largest  and  
 the most lii'inly  fixed,  he  states  his  belief  th a t  “  the  jaws  
 increased  posteriorly  and  decay  a t  th e   symphysis,  and  
 while th e   growth  is  going  on,  there  is  a  constant  succession  
 o f  new  teeth,  by  w'hich moans  the  new-formed  teeth  
 are  proportioned  to  the  jaw.” — Ph il.  Trans.  1788,  398.  
 Dr.  Fleming,  from  the  examination  o f  th e   jaws  o f  two  
 porpoises  of  different  ages,  thinks  “ the  jaws  lengthen  at  
 the  symphysis  and  a t  the  b a s e ; ”  and  th a t  the  new  teeth  
 formed  a t  these places  are  the  smallest,  and  th a t  there is  
 no  absorption.”—Fleming,  Ph il.  Zool.  ii.  208.  T h is may  
 be  the  case with  the  specimens  before  they arrive  a t  their  
 full  s i z e ;  b u t  no  skull  o f  this  kind  has  fallen  u nder  my  
 observation :  and  as  far  as  my  experience  will  carry me, 
 I  have  found  the  numbers,  size,  and  disposition  of  tbe  
 teeth,  one  of th e most  important  characters  for the  determination  
 o f the  species  and  the  definition  of  genera.  M.  
 F .  Cuvier’s  remarks  [Cetac.  103,  104)  on  the  teeth  as  the  
 characters  of  genera  are  n o t  consistent  with  my  observations, 
  b u t  I  have  found  them  quite  as  characteristic  o f the  
 different  genera  as  those  of  other  orders  o f  Mammalia,  
 though  they  do  not  pre sent  so  many  different forms.  At  
 the  same  lime,  it  is  true,  th a t  compilers like  Lesson,  who  
 have  n o t taken  the  trouble  to examine  a   single  skull,  have  
 made  far too many  genera.  And  I  may  also  observe  that  
 the  genera  Phoctena an d   Delphinapterus,  as formed  and  
 adopted  by  the  Cuviers  are  founded  on  very  slight  characters, 
  and bring together species  tlia th av e  very  little relation  
 to  each  other.  1  have  found  it necessary, for the  purpose  
 of more  distinctly  defining the  species,  to  divide  them  into  
 into  several  new  groups, which has  enabled  me  to  arrange  
 them  into what  appears  to be  a more natural  series,  and  to  
 more  nearly  circumscribe  the  genera. 
 My  thanks  are  due to Dr. Richardson  of  Ha sla r, to Mr.  
 Brightwell  and  the  Committee  of the Norwich  Philosophical  
 Society,  and  to Mr. Bell,  for allovving me  to have a t the  
 Museum  for  comparison  the  specimens  of these  animals  in  
 the  collections  under  ihcir  ca re;  and  to Mr. Owen  and the  
 Council  of the  College  of Surgeons,  and  to Mr. Fraser  and  
 the  Council  of  the  Zoological  Society,  for  permission  to  
 examine  the  skulls in  their Museums. 
 The  family  is  divided  into  sections  by  th e  form  o f  the  
 skull,  and  these  into  genera by the  form an d   disposition  of  
 the  teeth,  au d   by   the  absence  and  presence  of  the  dorsal  
 fin.A 
 .  Jaw-bones d ila te d  on each  side  behind. 
 a.  P ectoral  fin  tapering.  Jaw-bones  produced  and  
 b en t  up  before  the  orbits.  Tee th  few.  Hyperoo-  
 dontina. 
 b.  Pectoral  fin  truncated.  Jaw-bone produced, b en t  
 up  over the  orbits.  Tee th many.  Plaianisiina. 
 B.  Jaw-bone not  bent  up behind. 
 a.  Wing  o f jaw-bone  horizontal.  He ad   produced  in-  
 into  a  beak.  J 'c e th   numerous.  Delphinina. 
 b.  W in g o f the jaw-bone  horizontal.  H e ad  rounded.  
 Tee th numerous.  Orcadina. 
 c.  Win g  o f th e jaw-bone and beak shelved downwards. 
 Monocerina. 
 Having,  since  tho above  table  was  in  type,  h ad  the  opportunity  
 o f examining the  skulls  of Z ip h iu s  In ia ,  &c.,  I  
 am  induced  lo  propose  the  following  arrangement  as move  
 consistent with  their  natural  distribution :— 
 A.  Jaw s   tapering,  the  symphysis o f  the lower ja w   short  
 (n o t  h a l f   the  length  o f   the j a w ) .  Dorsal f i n  generally  
 distinc t.  Marine. 
 a.  U p p e r jaw  toothless,  lower jaw  with  only  one  or two  
 tee th  on  each  side,  often  hidden in  th e   gums.  Beak  
 of skull keeled  or winged  on  the  side.  Hyperoodon-  
 tina. 
 b.  U ppe r  and  lower  jaw   with  few  or  deciduous  teeth.  
 Wings  of jaw-bone  shelving downwards.  Monocera-  
 tina. 
 c.  U ppe r  an d   lower  jaw  with  many  teeth.  Wings  of  
 jaw-bone  horizontal.  Delphinina. 
 B.  Jaw s much  compressed,  the  sijmphysis  o f   th e  lower  
 very long, more  th a n   h a l f   the length ;  dorsal n o n e ;  teeth  
 in   both jaw s .  Fluviatile. 
 d.  Wings  o f jaw-bone  b en t up   in  front.  Pla ta n islin a . 
 e.  Wing o f jaw   expanded.  In im a . 
 A.  Jaw s tapering,  ihe  symphysis o f  the lower ja w  short,  
 not  h a l f  ihe  lengih  o f  the ja w .  Dorsal f i n  generally  distin 
 ct.  Pectoral f i n   ovate acute.  Marine. 
 a.  Upper ja w   toothless,  lowei- ja w  w ith   only one  or two  
 teeth  (w h ich   are  often  hidden  in   the gum s)  on  each  
 side.  B ea k   o f  ihe sku ll  keeled on  each  side,  the keel  
 being  sometimes  large,  an d  fo rm in g  a   large  k in d  o f  
 refiex ed  wing on  each  side.  Hyperoodoutina. 
 Synopsis o f  the  Genera. 
 1.  H y p e b o o d o n .—The  beak  o f  the  u pper  jaw  with  a  
 large  erect  wing-like  expansion  in  front  of  the  blowers,  
 lower jaw with  two  rudimentary  teeth  in  front. 
 2.  Z i p h i u s .— Beak  o f  upper jaw   keeled  on  each  side,  
 lower  jaw broad,  with  large  compressed  teeth  in  the middle  
 of  each  side. 
 3 .  D e l p h in o r h y n c h u s . — Beak  o f upper jaw keeled  on  
 each  side, lower  jaw  with  two  or  three  small, rudimentary,  
 conical  teeth  in  the middle  of each  side. 
 H y' p e r o o d o n ,   Lacep. 
 Delphinus,  part,  Lacep.  Uranodon, Rliger.  Nodus,  
 Wagler.  Aodon, Lesson.  Cetodiodon, Jacob. 
 Upper  jaw'  toothless ;  lower  jaw  with  a  small,  conical,  
 acute,  rudimentary,  moveable  tooth,  in  a  cavity under  the  
 gums,  on  each  side  of  the  front  part.  Blowers  linear,  
 transverse,  sub-limate. 
 According  to Voight and Wesraael,  the ends of the blowers, 
   as  in  other Dolphins,  point  forward.  Dale, Baussard  
 and  Douraet  describe  them  as  pointing  backwards;  Des-  
 marest  and  others  assumed  the  latter  as  a  generic  ch a racter. 
   Illiger’s genus,  Uranodon, depends  on  the  hard  sharp  
 points  said  to  be  found  in  the  palate  by Baussard.  Wes-  
 mael  did  not find  them  in  his  specimen. 
 This  genus  is  a t  once  known  from  Delphinorhijnchus,  
 without  examining  the  skull,  by  the  head  being more  convex  
 and rounded in  front,  an d  the  two  tee th  being situated  
 in  th e  front  end  o f the  lower jaw , while  in  th a t  genus  they  
 are  in   the middle  of each  side. 
 The  descriptions  o f the  species  o f  th is  genus  are  so  different, 
   that  I  am  inclined  to  keep  them  distinc t,  for  the 
 purpose  o f  calling  attention  to  •  lem.  Cuvier  regarded 
 them  all  as  one. 
 * Dorsal f i n  in  the centre o f  the hack.  Hype roodon, Lacep.  
 Uranodon, Illig er. 
 The  B o t t l e -h e a d .  Hyperoodon Buiskopf. 
 Tab. 
 1.  Hyperoodon  Butskopf,  Lacep.  Cetac.  319;  from  
 Baussard,  Jour.  Phys.  xx x iv .  201, f.  copied F.  Cuv.  
 Cetac.  241,  t.  17, f .   1,  t.  1 1 ,/.  1,  cop. 
 De lphinus ?  edentatus,  Schreb.  Saugth.  t.  347. 
 D.  Hyperoodon, Desm.  Mam.  521. 
 D.  Honfloriensis, Desm. 
 D.  Butskopf, Bo n n a t.  25. 
 2.  Bottle-head,  or F lounder’s He ad ,  Dale,  Hist.  H a r wich, 
   411,  t.  149,  cop. 
 Beaked Whale,  Penn.  B r it.  Zool.  t. 
 Black, bene ath lead-coloured ;  dorsal  fin  central ;  lower  
 jaw  with 2 pointed teeth  in  front,  sunk  in  th e  gums ;  “ p a late  
 with  acute  hard  points  blowers  transverse,  lunate,  
 with  th e   convexity  in  front. 
 In hab.  North  Sea.  Harwich, Dale. 
 B aossakd. 
 Adult. Young. 
 Length,  entire, 23-6 ft.  12-6 
 „  o fb e a k ,  .... 0-5 
 „   to  blower  .... 4-4 M l 
 „   of head,  .... 1-4 
 „  o f pectoral, 2'0 1-0 
 „  to  dorsal  fin, 13-6 7-8 
 Length  o f dorsal  fin, 2-0 1 0 
 „   to  vent. 7-10 
 Width  of pectoral. T3 7- 
 „  of caudal,  .... 6T0 3-2 
 Circumference, 15-7 8-0 
 „   o f head,,  8-7 
 H e ig h t  of dorsal,  .... T3 7. 
 D a le.  
 Fema le.  Male.  
 13  ft.  18  ft. 
 Lacepède  called  the  genus  Hyperoodon,  and  Illiger  
 Uranodon,  because  o f the  teeth  on  the p ala te described by  
 Baussard.  They  have not been  observed  on  th e   other specimens  
 ;  and  Illiger,  in  his  generic  character,  by mistake  
 says  the  two  teeth  are  in  the  upper jaw ,  [Gen.  143). 
 Heterodon Dalei  (Lesson),  is not  from Da le’s,  b u t  from  
 Blainville’s  account of Delphinorhynchus micropierus. 
 Lacepède placed  this  species  as  the  type  o f  his  H y p e r oodon, 
   and refers De lphinus bidenfalus  lo Delp h in u s f   
 F . Cuvier considers H u n te r’s  and Baussard’s as incontes-  
 tib ly th e   same  species,  taking  no  notice  of  the  position  of  
 the  dorsal  [Cetac.  242).  Dale  does not mention  th e  teeth,  
 b u t  they  are  only  to be  seen when  the flesh is  removed.