
 
        
         
		w 
 compressed  in  front, with  tlie  lower  edge  from  th e   angle  to  
 tlie  gouyx  longer  th a n   th e   jaws  are  wide  a t  the  angle.  
 Palate  very  deep  and  wide,  broad  in  front,  contracted  
 beiiind, with  the lateral  processes  ra th e r  contracted. 
 Inhab.  Coast of South  America. 
 Only  known  from  two  skulls. 
 1-  Perfect  skull  of  an  adult  male  in  the  British  
 Museum,  which  is  1 1 |  inches  long,  and  6|   inches wide  at  
 the  condyles.  Sixth  upper grinder behind th e  liinder  edge  
 Ilf the  front  of the  zygomatic  arch,  the  lower jaw  8^  inches  
 long,  wide  and  strong,  contracted  on  th e  sides  in   front.  
 The  scar  of th e  masseter muscle in  the lower jaw is elongate  
 and  uan'ow  in  front. 
 2.  An  imperfect  skull  (3ooe)  about  12  inclies  long,  and  
 1)7  inches  wide,  wanting  th e   intermaxillary  hones,  and  
 luw’iug  only  th e   canine  te e th ;  w ith   the  palate  deep,  
 slightly  contracted  behind,  lobes  erect,  the  sixth  upper  
 grinder separated  from  th e  fifth  by  a  space  ju s t  before  the  
 back  edge  of the  front  of  the  zygomatic  arch.  Lower jaw  
 compressed  in  front. 
 This  species  may  be  th e   same  as  Otaria  Godcffroyii,  
 described  and  figured  by Dr.  P eters  from  a  specimen  in  
 the Hamburg Museum,  b u t  th e front  of the  lower jaw  does  
 not  appear  to  be  the  same  as  th a t  of  th e  skulls  in  the  
 Lritish  M u seum ;  it  and  th e   sear  of  th e masseter muscle  
 are.  broad  and  rounded  a t  the  end  as  in  th e   jaws  of  the 
 common  Sea  Lion,  Otaria  jubata,  and  Otaria  Godeffroyi,  
 may  indicate  anotlier  species. 
 O t a r ia   U l l o je ,  The  Pygmy  Sea  L io n , 
 Otaria  Ullore,  Tschudi, Fauna  Feruana,  13C,  t.  vi.  (animal) 
  ;  Fclers, Monastb.  18G6,  667,  i.  (skull). 
 Otaria  (Phocarctos) Ulloie, Feters, Moiiaisb.,  1866,  270. 
 Otaria pygimea,  Ch-ay, A n n .  c& Mag.  Nat. Hist.,  .1874. 
 The  skull  elongate,  narrow.  T.ower  jaw  elongate,  sides  
 flat  compressed  in  front,  with  the  lower  edge  from  tiie  
 angle  to  th e   gonyx  longer  th an   the  jaws  are  wide  a t  the  
 angle.  Palate  very  narrow,  deep,  scarcely  wider  behind.  
 S ix th   upper  grinder  behind  the  hinder  edge  of tlie  front of  
 th e   zygomatic  arch.  Lower  jaw  comparatively  slender,  
 64  inches  long,  compressed  and  fiat in   front. 
 Only  known  from  an  adult, most  probably  female  sknll.  
 in  the  collection  of tlie  British  Museum,  received  from  the  
 Zoological  Society  iu  1858. 
 Inhab.  South America.  Coast  of Peru  {Tschudi). 
 Since  I  described  the  skull  in  the  Museum  under  the  
 name  of  O.pygmcea  I   liave  again  compared  it  with  the  
 figure  of Otaria  Ulloce given  by Dr. Peters,  from  one  of tlie  
 skulls  of  tlie  original  animals  described  by Tschudi,  and  
 have  very  little   doubt  i t   is  tlie  same,  tliough  Dr.  Peters  
 does  not  mention  th e   form  of  the  lower  jaw  whicli  is  so  
 characteristic. 
 I l l ,— THE  SEA  LIOXS  AXD  SEA  BEARS  OF  THE  SOUTHERN  HEMISPHERE. 
 f Since  th e  Synopsis  of the  species  of Seals  was  published  
 s])ecimens  of the  Sea Lion  liave  been  exhibited in England,  
 aiul  th e   British  Museum  has  received  many  specimens  of  
 them  and  of  th eir  skulls,  and  a   few  skeletons,  and  the  
 examination  of them has  proved  th a t  instead of th e ir forming  
 a  tribe  of th e   Seals, which was called  in 
 the  Synopsis,  they  form  a  distin c t  family from  th e  earless  
 Seals, Fhocidce, with  a   distinc t  h ab it  and  stru ctu re ;  they 
 liave more  power  of using th e ir limbs, like  th e  more tjqiical 
 d   frc 
 so  little   u nder  fur when  they  arrive  a t  the  ad u lt  age  tliat  
 they  are  of  no  use  for  making  Seal  Skins.  The  under  fur  
 is  only attached  to  the  surface  of  the  skin, while  the  long  
 rigid  hair  is  rooted  to  th e   inner  layers  of  the  skin,  they  
 therefore  come  out wlien  th e   inner  surface  of  th e   skin  is  
 shaved  off,  leamng  the  under  fur,  wliich  forms  what  is  
 called  Seal  S k in   by  the  fumers,  attached  to  th e  outer  su rface  
 of th e   skin. 
 Mammalia,  walking  on  them,  with  th e   body raised  from  
 the  ground,  th ey  re st with  th e ir h in d   limbs  b en t  forward.  
 These  habits  were  well  shown  iu  Dr.  Foreter’s  figure  
 imgraved  by  Buffon,  and  they  have  been  verified  by  the  
 study  of the  living  animal  in  th e  Zoological Gardens. 
 Their scrotum and genital organs are exposed as in the dog. 
 The  Sea Bears and  Sea Lions inhabit  the more temperate  
 and  colder  p arts  of  th e   Southern  Hemisphere  and  more  
 uinthern  regions  of the  Pacific  Ocean. 
 So much  improvement has taken  place  in  our knowledge  
 since  th e   “ Syn o p sis”  given  a t  page  4   was written  th a t  !  
 give  an  abstract  of  what  is  a t  present  known  of  th e   Sea  
 Lions  and  Sea Bears  of the  Soutliern Seas. 
 I f  one  had  th e   opportunity  of  examining  these  animals  
 alive there is  no doubt th a t they would  present very decided  
 characters  in  th e form  of the face  and  size  and  structure  of  
 th e   ears  and feet,  and  th e   length  of  the  flaps  of  the  toes, 
 They  are  said  to  make  periodical  migrations  towards  
 he  pules.  They  come  to  th e  surface  during  th e   process  of  
 mastication  and  do  not  drink  like  the  Sefils.  The  pupils 
 b u t all  these  p a rts  are  liable  to  be  altered  iu  the  preparing  
 i chief charac 
 nf  th e   eyes  dilate  and  contract  to  a   great  extent.  The  
 females  lie  on  th eir  backs  to  receive  the  caresses  of  the  
 m a le :  th ey   bring  forth  th eir  young  far  inland,  and  they  
 ai-e gi-adually  tau g h t  to  swim. 
 They generally  have  a  very  close  soft  under fur between  
 the  I’oots  of  th e   longer  and  more  rigid  hairs,  hence  they  
 are  called  F u r  Seals. 
 The  quantity  and  fineness  of the  under fur differ accovd-  
 )  th e  seasonsi,,   ;and  the  age  of th e   animal.  Some  have 
 of th e  specimens for Museums, therefore th e characters  
 for  the  distinction  of  genera  and  species  are  those  aifoi'ded  
 by  th e  skulls,  as  these  alone  are  accessible  to  th e   scientific  
 zoologist  and  afford  th e   only means  by  which  lie  can  compare  
 th e  Sea Bears from different localities, and the different  
 genera  and  species  peculiar  to  each  locality, 
 Steller  described  a  Leo marinus  and  an  UrsuA marinus  
 from  Kamschatka,  and  Temminck  figured  tlie  animal  and  
 skeleton  of  a  Seal  iu  th e   “ F auna Japónica ”  under  tlie  
 name  of  Otaria  Stelleri,  confounding  it   with  tlie  Leo  
 marimcs  of Steller, which Lesson had  called Otaria  Stelleñ.  
 Mr. McBain,  who  received  the  skull  of this  animal,  named 
 it  Otaria  Gillicspii.  I  have  figured  th e  skulls  of  these  
 three  animals  from  the  North  Pacific,  P.Z.S.,  1859,  under  
 the  names  of,  1.  Callorhinus  ursinus,  P.Z.S.,  1859,  t.  58, 
 2.  Eumetopias  Stellei-i,  P.Z.S.,  1859,  t.  72.  3.  Zalophus  
 CiUiespii,  P.Z.S.,  1859, t.  70.  Mr. A llen has given  a  furthe r  
 iiocount  of  these  animals,  and  1  have  figured  and  described  
 a  fourth  species  under  the  name  of  Eumetopias  elongata,  
 I’.Z.S.,  1872,  738,  fs.  2  and  3,  b u t  the  examination  of  a  
 second  specimen  of  a  skull  has  shown  me  th a t  it   is more  
 lilce  a  Phocarctos  tlian  a Eumetopias. 
 th e   middle  Qf  th e  zygomatic  arch.  Grinders  4:4,  with  
 compressed  lobed  crowns,  th e   sixth  upper  behind  the  
 back  edge  of the  front  of  the  zygomatic  arch,  and  th e   fifth  
 even with  it.  Under fur  none,  or  very  sparse. 
 P h o c a r c t o s   H o o k e r i .  The Southern H a ir  Seal. 
 Arctocephalus  Hookeri,  Gray,  Cat.  Seals, Brit. Mus.,  45,  
 .11);-       ■ '  - 
 G y p so ph o c a ,  Gray. 
 Froc.  Zool.  Soc.,  1872,^5;).  659  and  743. 
 / .   15  (sk u ll);  Cat.  Seals <&  Whales,  5 3 ,/.  17  (skull). 
 H a ir Seal,  Weddell,  Voy.,  141. 
 Pale  yellowish,  flaps  of hinder  toes  elongate,  unequal.  
 Inhab.  Falkland  Islands,  Cape Horn. 
 P la te  14.  Drawing  of  animal  from  a  stuffed  skin.  
 Pla te  15,  its  skull. 
 'I'lie  palate  short,  contracted behind ;  th e   opening  of  the  
 inner  nostrils  on  a  level  with  th e   middle  of th e   zygomatic  
 arch.  The  grinders  4 ’f   th e  fifth  and  sixth  upper  quite  
 bcliiiul  tiie  front  edge  of the  zygomatic  arch. 
 G y p so ph o c a   t r o p ic a l is .  The  Sub-tropical  F u r Seal. 
 Gypsophoca  tropicalis,  Gra?/,  F.Z.S.,  1872,  p.  659,  fs.  5  
 and  6  (.skull). 
 Arctocephalus cinereus. Gray, Cat. Seals &  Whales, p. 56 ;  
 Suppl., p.  2 4 ;  A n n . &  Mag.  Nat. H is t,  1866,  x v iii.,^ .  236. 
 Black,  grey  beneath,  under fa r abundant,  reddish  brown. 
 Inhab. N, Australia  {MacGillimay). 
 Dr.  Peters  describes  a  F u r  Seal, m  th e  British Museum,  
 sent  from  Ju a n   Fernandez  Island,  under  th e  name  of  
 Arctophoca  Philippii,  Peters, Monatsb.  May,  1866,  pp.  276  
 and  671,  t.  2  (skull),  and  I  have  noticed it,  in  the  Suppl.  
 Cat-  Seals  &  Whales  as  th e   Chilian  F u r  Seal,  b u t  have  
 never  seen  the  .skull  on whicli  it  is  described,  and  have  a  
 suspicion th a t it represents  a  species of Gypsophoca th a t  has  
 lost  its  hinder grinders. 
 Dr.  Pliilippi  sent  a  description  of  a  skull  th a t  he  had  
 received  from  the  Island  of  Massafuera,  on  th e  west  coast  
 of S. America, which  is  published  by Dr.  Peters.  Monatsb.,  
 (871, p. 588,  1. 1  and 2, which he  cnWs, Arctophoca  argentata. 
 I he  skull wants  the  hinder p a rt  of  th e   brain  case,  has  six  
 grinders  in  its  upper  jaw,  and  is  iu  ei'ery resjiect very  like  
 the  skull  of  Gypsophoca  tropicalis,  and  the  Arctophoca  
 Fhilippii frera  Ju a n  Fernandez.  I t   chiefly differs, from the  
 Hgure  of  th e  latte r  skull,  as  Dr.  Philippi  shows  in  his  
 I'late, in   the  hinder portion  of  i t  being  narrower,  and  tlie  
 cojidyles much  shorter or ra the r  narrower. 
 These  three  skulls  appear  to me  to  belong  to  one  group,  
 but whether  they  are  three  distinc t  species,  two  from  the  
 west  coast of South America, and  one from N orth Australia, 
 I  will  not  attempt  to  determine,  as  I  have  seen  only  the  
 skins  and  skull  of the  one  from  th e la tte r  region,  b u t 'th e y   
 are  all  F u r Seals,  and may  be  distinct. 
 A r c t o c e p h a l u s . 
 S kull  ra th e r  broad,  oblong.  Palate  contracted  b e liin d ;  
 the  opening  of  th e  inner  nostrils  in  a  line with  about the  
 middle  of the  zygomatic  arch.  Grinders  4:|.  the  crown  of  
 th e  u pper  compressed,  slightly  lobed,  of  th e   lower  ones  
 broad,  slightly  lobed.  The  s ix th   upper  behind  and  tlie  
 fifth  level with  the  back  edge  of tiie  front  of the zygomatic  
 arch.  Under  fur moderately  developed. 
 Grinders  of th e  upper jaw  compressed, with  an  elongate  
 triangular  central  crown, with  a  collaret  on  the  inner  side,  
 and  a  small  lobe  on  th e   back  and  often  on th e   front of  the  
 collaret. 
 Tlie  form  of  the  crowns  of  the  lower  gi-inders  is  verv  
 peculiar  and  ch a rac teristic;  h arin g   only  two  skulls  of  '  
 ad u lt  animals  in  the  British  Museum  it  had,  u n til  lately,  
 escaped my  obseiwation, as tlie  crowns of  these  skulls  were  
 mostly  broken  off or  cliipped, bu t  on  very minute  examination  
 I   find  the  crowns  of  two  or three  tee th  of  one  of  the  
 specimens  are  perfect,  and  present a   decided  difference  of  
 structure  from  th a t  of all  th e  other species  of Sea Bears. 
 A r c t o c e p h a l u s   a x t a r c t ic u s .  The Cape  F u r Seal.  
 Plioca antárctica,  Thunb., Mem.  Petrop.  iii.,  322.  
 I ’hoca  ursina,  Cuv., Oss.  Foss. 
 Arctocephalus  ursinus, F. Cuv., Mem. Mus. xi., 205, tab.  15  
 no.  -I   ('s  k• uillll)).. 
 Arctocephalus  Delalandii,  Gray,  F.Z.S.,  1859,  tab.  60  
 (skull). 
 Inhab.  Cape  of Good  Hope. 
 E u o t a r ia , 
 Arctocephalus ** Euotaria, Gray,  Suppl. Cat  S.  cb  W., 20.  
 Skull  ra th e r  broad  oblong.  Palate  contracted  behind,  
 the  opening  of  th e   inner  nostrils  in  a  line  with  about  the  
 middle  of th e   zygomatic arch.  Grinders  44, the upper  and 
 P h o c a r c t o s ,  Gray. 
 A .  Æ  Jf.  a :   11,  1S66,  xviii.,  234 ;  Sappi,  Cat.  Seals and  
 Whales,  13. 
 lower  with  a  compressed  elongated  triangular  central  
 crown  with  a  small lobe  on  its  back,  and  often  on  its  front 
 edge.  The  sixth  upper  behind, and  the  fiftli  even with the  
 back  edge  of th e   front  of the  zygomatic  arch. 
 Skull  e longa te;  face  ra th e r  produced  in  fr o n t;  palate  
 short,  contracted  behind,  th e   inner  nostrils  in  a  line with 
 E u o t a r ia   s c h is t h y p e r o ë s ,  Turner.  
 Arctocephalus schisthyperoës,  Turner, Jo vm . Anut., 1868  
 1 1 3 ,/.  (skull).