
 
		à'J 
 1 6 0 .  A p t c r y x   MzAn t e l l i . 
 y x  mantelli, B a r tl.;  Finsch,  J.  f .   0.  1872,  p .  263  ;  
 Bidler,  B. N.  Z.,  p .  258,  3 4 ;  Boiolcy,  Orn. Misc., p .  25. 
 Dr.  Buller  separates  this  species  from  A .  australis,  and  
 I must  say th a t, when  I   examined his series,  I   thought th a t  
 he  had  made  out  his  case.  Dr.  Finsch,  Dr.  Sclater,  aud  
 lastly  Mr.  Dawson.  Eowley,  u n ite   them,  so  th a t  i t   is  a  
 moot point as  to whether  it   is  anything more th a n   a  race  
 of th e   other bird. 
 A  good  plate  of  th is  species  is  given  by  .Dr.  Buller,  and  
 Mr.  Dawson  Eowley  figures  both  adults  and young. 
 1 6 2 .  A p t e r y x   h a a s t i . 
 Apteryx  haasti,  Fotts;  Finsch,  J.  f .   0.  1872,  p.  271,  ct  
 1874,  p.  220;  Bidler, B.  N . Z.,  p.  370;  Rowley,  Orn. Misc., 
 pis.  i,  iii. 
 I   have  examined  the  specimens  of this  splendid Aptcryx,  
 which  were  exhibited  by Mr.  George  Dawson  Eowley' at 
 1 6 1 .  A p t e r y x   o w e n i . 
 Apteryx  oweni,  Oould;  Finsch,  J.  f .   0.  1872,  p.  268,  ct  
 1874,  p.  220 ;  Buller,  B.  N.  Z.,  p .  368,  p l.  35 ;  ~  ’  
 Orn. Misc., pis.  ii,  v. 
 th e   Zoological  Society,  and  have  since  been  beautifuUy  
 figured  by   him  in   his  “ Ornithological  Miscellany.”  I t   
 speaks volumes for the enterprise of tliis i ggeennttlleemmaann  tthh aa tt   hhee,.  
 a t  liis  own  expense,  has  k ep t  a  collector in  New  Zealand,  
 aud has  n o t relaxed  his  eneigy  untO.  he  has  become  the  
 sole  possessor in  Europe  of tins  little  known  bird. 
 I n   compiling th e   foregoing review  of New Zealand Ornithology, I  m u st disclaim  any idea of overlooking such works  
 as  Captam  H u tto n ’s  “ Catalogue”  of  New  Zealand  Birds,  or  of Mr.  P o tt’s  numerous  papers  published in  th e  various  
 scientific journals.  My  first intention was  to  carry  on  th e   synonymy  of  th e   various  species  from  the  year  1844, when  
 th e  foregoing portion  of th e  “ Voyage” was  published,  down  to  th e   present time.  I   soon foimd,  however,  th a t  this  had  
 been  most  completely  done  by  Dr.  Fiuseli  and  th a t  to  do  it   effectually  I   should  he  obliged  to  copy  direct  from  
 him.  I   have,  therefore,  only  given  references  to  Dr.  Buller’s  large  work,  as  containing  th e  best  account  of  th e  life-  
 history of these  birds,  and to Dr,  Finsch’s  best-known papers  iu  th e  “ Jo u rn a l  für  Ornithologie”  where will  be  found a  
 complete  set of references  to  all  th e   species  down  to  th e   commencement  of th e  year  1874.  I n  th e  most recent of his  
 papers he  also  gives  a list of th e   doubtful New Zealand  birds with remarks  on  th eir  history. 
 Before finishing  th is  portion  of  my  subject  I  th in k   it   advisable  to  give  a   k ey   to  all  th e   species mentioned hy  
 Mr. Gray .in th e   original work,  th e  nomenclature  of  which has  been in  any w ay altered  since th a t  date, with an indication  
 of th eir  exact title s  in   th e  appendix  I   have  now vTitten. 
 p.  1. Falco  novæ  z e alan d iæ .=H a rp a  novæ  zealandiæ,  
 (Gm.). 
 Cii'cus  assimilis. =  C.  Gouldi,  (Bp). 
 Athene  novæ  zealandiæ,=Spiloglaux  novæ  zealaudiæ, 
   (Gin). 
 Athene  albifacies.=Sceloglaux  albifacies,  (G a y ).  
 Halcyon  cinnamominus  is  not  a New Zealand  bird.  
 Neomorpha gouldi.=He te ralocha acutirostris, {(?/(/.).  
 Ac anthisitta longipes. =X e n ic u s   longipes,  (Gm.).  
 Certhiparus  macuiicaudus. =  C.  novæ  zealandiæ,  
 (Gm.). 
 Petroica  dieffenbachii.= Myiomoira  macrocephala,  
 ((?».). 
 „  toitoi.=Myiomoira toitoi,  (Zcss.). 
 „  albifrons. =  Miro  albifrons,  (Gm.). 
 „  a u stra lis.=M iro   longipes,  (Garn.). 
 Rhipidura  melanura.  =   Rhipidura  fuliginosa, 
 p. 11.  
 „  12. 
 Charadrius virginiauus,=Charadrius fulvus, (Gm).  
 Thinornis  rossii.  =   Thinornis  novæ  zealandiæ. 
 12.  
 12.  
 ,  13.  
 ,  14.  
 ,  14.  
 ,  16.  
 ,  17. 
 (Gm.). 
 Callæas  cinerea.=Glaucopis  cinerea,  (Gm). 
 Aplonis  zelandicus  is  not a  New  Zealand bird.  
 Aplonis  obscurus  is n o t  a New Zealand  bird.  
 Trichoglossus  aurifrons  is  not  a New Zealand bird. 
 Hiaticula bicincta.= Charadrius  bicinctus,  (J. é  S.).  
 Herodias flavirostris.=Ardea  egretta,  (Gm.).  
 Herodias matook. =  Ardea  sacra,  (Gm.). 
 Ocydromus  dieffenbachii.= Cabalus  dieffenbachii.  
 Rallus  assimilis. =  Rallus  philippinensis,  (L).  
 Spheniscus m in o r.=E u d y p tu la  minor,  (Gm.).  
 Eudyptes  pachyrhynchus. = E u d y p te s   chrysocoma,  
 (Forst). 
 Eudyptes ^  antipodes.  =   Eudyptes  antipodmii, 
 Puffinus  a;quinoctialis.  Not  known  for  certain  as  
 a New Zealand bird. 
 Puffinus maJor.=Puffinus  griseus,  (Gm).  
 Thalassidroma  marina.  =  Thalassidroma  fregata,  
 (Z.). 
 Procellaria gigantea.=Os.sifraga  gigantea,  (Gm).  
 Procellaria gavia.= Puffinus  gavius,  (Zbrj/,). 
 Lestris antarcticus. =  Stercorarius catarrhactcs, (JU).  
 Hydrochelidon  albostriata, =  Sterna antárctica. 
 p.  1 9 ,  Gracalus  cirrhatus.=Phalac rocorax  carunculatus.  
 ’  Gracalus  varius. =  Phalacrocorax varius,  (G ay). 
 Gracalus  chalconotus.= Phalacrocorax  chalconotus,  
 (Gray). 
 Gracalus  punctatus.  =   Phalacrocorax  punctatus,  
 (Sparrm.). 
 „  20. 
 Gracalus  carboides. = :Phalacrocorax  carbo,  (L.).  
 Gracalus  melanoleucus.  Phalacrocorax  finschi, 
 „  20. „  20. Gracalus  brevirostris.= Phalacrocorax  brevirostris,  
 (Gould). 
 The following is  a  List of th e birds, not  from New Zealand, bu t obtained in   other p arts  of th e   southern  ocean  by  the  
 Antartic Expedition  and  figured in   th e  present work. 
 Family,  S c o l o p a c id æ .  
 G a l l in a g o   s t k ic k l a n d i i . 
 Pla te  23. 
 Gallinago  stricklandii.  Gray,  Toy. Freh.  &  Teiror, Birds,  
 pl.  23;  id., TAst  Gallm,  B.  M ,  p .  112;  Sci.  &  Salvin,  Ex.  
 Om.,  p .  19G;  G a y ,  Handl.  B.  iii,  p .  5 5 ;  Set.  4'  Salv.  
 NomencL,  p .  145. 
 Scolopax meridionalis,  Pcale,  U.  S.  Expl.  Exp.,  p.  229;  
 Cass.  op.  cit.  cd.  2, p.  310. pl.  3 5 ,/.  1. 
 Scolopax  spectabilis, Haril.  Naiom.  1853,23.  216. 
 A  pair  of tins  fine  Snipe  was  obtained  by  th e Antarctic  
 .ition  a t He rmit  Island. 
 extend  fa rther along th e  sides of the  body to  the vent.  Mr.  
 W o lf s  excellent plate, accompanying Dr.  Sclater’s paper,  is  
 more  accurate, and  on  comparing it  with th e  illustrations  of  
 C.poliocephala, (Zool. Sk. 1st series, pl. xlix)  a  very good idea  
 of  th e  differences  between  these  two  species  can  be  
 formed. 
 Two  specimens  from  th e   Falkland  Islands,  male  and  
 female, were  obtained  by  the Expedition. 
 Ex- 
 Family,  A n a t id æ .  
 C l o e p h a g a   in o r n a t a . 
 Family,  P r o c e l l a r i iDzE, 
 P a g o d r om a   n iv e a . 
 (Plate  34.) 
 Procellaria  nivea,  (G m);  G a y ,  Voy.Ereb. &  Terr, B in h , 
 Pla te  30. 
 Anser inornatus, mas., King, P.  Z.  S.  1830,2?. 
 Branta inornata,  G a y , Handl.  B.  iii, p.  77. 
 Cloephaga  inornata,  Sci.  ct  Salv. Nomencl.  av.  neotr.,  p.  
 128. 
 The  bird figured in  th e   plate is  the  t}q>e  of King’s Anser  
 inornatus,  and  was  received  by   th e   Museum  from  tlie  
 Zoological Society.  I t  is  not  referable,  as  far  as  I  can 
 p l.  3 4 ;  id.  L ist  Grallcc <&e.,  B. M.,  p .  164;  Coues,  Pr  P h i l ’  
 Acad.,  1866,2?.  150. 
 Fulmarus  niveus. Gray, Handl. B.  iii, p.  107, 
 Several  specimens were  procured  by  th e  e.xpedition  aud  
 are  duly  enumerated  in Mr. Gray’s  list,  (/. c.). 
 PRIOCELLA  ANTARCTICA. 
 to  any  of th e   allied  species.  Dr.  Sclater,  (P.  Z.  S.,  1860,2?.  
 388,)  also writes:—“ The bird  described as Anasinoimatus, 
 mas,  by  Capt.  King,  wliich  is  now in  the British Museum,  
 i.s  decidedly  different, in my  opinion,  from  both Chloephaga  
 polioccphala  and  0.  rubidieeps, most  nearly resembling the  
 male  of C. magcllanica, b u t being much  smaller.” 
 (Plate  33.) 
 Procellaria  antárctica,  G i'.;  Gray,  Voy. Ereb  &  Terr  M  
 8 8 ; id .L i s tG r a l la :& c .,B .M „ p .\ k . 
 Tlialassoica  antárctica,  Reich.;  Coues, Pr. Philad  Acad  
 1866,2?.  31. 
 Fulmarus  antarcticus,  G a y , Handl. B. m ,p .  105. 
 Dr.  Coues  has  separated  this  species  as  a  Tlialassoica  
 apart  Irom  th e   Fulmarus,  and  I   follow  liim  as  the  best  
 authority  on  this  group  of  birds.  But  Reiclieubach’s 
 C l o e p h a g a   r u b id ic e p s .  
 P la te  24. 
 generic  name  must  give  way  to  Priocella  of  Jacquinot  
 (Voy.  Pole  Sud,  iii,  p.  148),  and  this  species  should  he  
 Icuowii  as Priocella  antárctica. 
 Family,  S p h e n is c id æ .  
 Beniicla  inornata, G-ay,  Voy. Ereb.  & Tcir. Birds,  pl.  24.  
 Cloephaga  rubidiceps,_  Sci.  P.  Z.  S.,  1860,  p .  387,  pl.  
 xxxiii;  Gray,  Handl. B.  iii, p.  77;  Sci.  & Salv. Nomencl.  av.  
 neotr, p.  128. 
 This  species  was  first  discilminated  from  C. g 
 b}'  Dr.  Sclater  (I c.),  and  the  cUfferences  are  duly set  forth  id. List G a llw &c  B M   p  156 •  id  
 by  him.  He  appears,  however,  to  have  overlooked  th e   Sci.  &  Salv.  Nomencl.,  p . ’l5 1 -  Hi/att  
 ])late published  (without  text)  in  the  present w'ork, and has  gx  11.  >  a  > 
 A p t e n o d y t e s   l o n g ir o s t r is . 
 (Plate  32.) 
 Aptenodytes  pennantii,  G a y , A n n .  -V  H ,   1844, 
 J  7--.L  n ....n..  /.  I.  Tr  T  .T  ' \   Jlandl.  R.  iii, 
 ).  315:  
 p .  99 ;  
 .,  1871, 
 ,  Rr.  Bost.  Soc., 
 religured  tlie  species in  th e  “Prooeedmgs.”  The  plate  here  "  Aptenodytes  longirostris,  Cmies,  P r   P h il  A m i   
 given IS  not  altogether  exact,  as  th e   barred  flauk-feathers  2^.  193.  '  ’ 1872, 
 " S 
 H I: 
 % 
 .-te