
 
		to  cross  a valley  in  its  course,  its  progress  
 is necessarily impeded till  the hollow is filled  
 up:  it  must,  too,  carry  with  it  a  great  
 number  of  stones  and  other  things,  with  
 which  such  streams  of  lava  are filled.  Beneath  
 the  surface,  on  the  contrary,  where  
 only  that  lava  can  penetrate which  is  in its  
 purest  and most  fluid  state,  it  finds  its way  
 into  many  places  through  a more loose and  
 open soil,  percolating like water,  continuing  
 the  same even course,  and  is  not stopped by  
 the  above-mentioned  inequalities;  but flows  
 forward uninterruptedly  to  a  great  distance.  
 The  fire  having  in  this  manner  forced  its  
 way  down  into  the  earth,  and  proceeded  
 forward,  it  is  easy  to  conceive  that,  in  
 consequence  of  the  vast  heat  arising  from  
 so  much  burning  matter,  the  damp  and  
 moisture  would  be  converted  into  vapors,  
 and  that  these,  by  the  force  of  the  lava,  
 would  be  driven  up  through  the  crevices,  
 to  the  surface of  the earth,  appearing above  
 ground  in  flames.  Where,  indeed,  the  soil  
 is  full  of rocks, it  is  not  possible  for  the fire-  
 stream  to  proceed  with  any velocity  beneath  
 the surface,  much  less through  the  old  lava-  
 tracts,  which  are  of  considerable  depth. 
 From  these  considerations  I  conclude  that  
 the  fire  has  never  been  known  to  proceed,  
 either from  the  late  volcanoes  in  Iceland,  or  
 those in  any other part of the world, through  
 the uninjured crust of the earth, at a distance  
 from  the  lava-stream,  except,  indeed,  from  
 the causes just mentioned. 
 I  really  believe  that  there  is  no  more  
 reason  for  inferring  from  the  fire  bursting  
 through  the  earth  at  a  distance  from  the  
 stream  of  lava,  that  the  earth  itself  is  ignited, 
   than  there would be  to draw the same  
 conclusion  from  a  simple  eruption.  And  
 among  other  forcible  arguments,  in  favor  
 of  my opinion,  it  strikes  me  that  the  continual  
 supplies  of  matter which  the  streams'  
 i  receive  are  a  strong proof  that  such  a  fire is  
 really the effect of an eruption.  They imply  
 one  common  source  and  one  spot  whence  
 they originate,  therefore  properly  belong  to  
 one  eruption,  and  are  by no  means  caused  
 by  the  earth  itself  being  on  fire:  for,  
 had  this  been  the  case,  I  should  imagine  
 that  burnt  matter  must have  been  found  at  
 a  much  greater  depth  below  the  surface  of  
 the  earth  than  is  the  case  on  open  plains,