S t . ;
Order. S T O M A P O D A . Latreille.
G e n u s .
C i l . S p .
m q ü il l a m a n t i s .
P la te 4i).
S « , n . r a , F a h r ie iu s . Can c e r, p . L in n a u s
L ^ g t l , o f th e b o t r i i X ’ “ ° ” “ “ - ‘- - ¡ ‘y-
S v » . C an c e r M an tis, L in n . S ,js i. N a t . 2. ,0 5 4 . F a i . E n t S y u 2 5 , , n
C e » , » r . s C „ s t„ c e r , , 2,5t. E n e y e i. M é th . Z L - A Z T
appearance tlian c l T ’'" T I ' ' ' ’
extremely different f r o l t L t i T “ T t^ -
novan could not Itesitate ¡rco n c ln d hm 1 T " T » « -
and indefinite. Tins may be observed“ „ s e v Z T Z f S'™“ '’ *» ''efective
and throughout a more extensive number J f ‘ X " '1™'“' ' '
autlior. It is evident Linnæus could è e ) 1 ‘"‘f time o f that
cipal families, the Brachi/uri and Mnrr ^ 5 af>ti'visious of the two prinlater
naturalists have ventured, with'proprTetv’ to .![, t l '" “ ' ' ‘“ r
Desmarest gives the Mediterraneo tl 1 r ° ^''rangement,
liere figured, which is very common Z t i l Cl ' Ï M»atis , but the .species
agrees witli tlio extended characters given of S ^ M a n f i r ^ F V " '“ *' “ * “ " " " 'y ’
■n man Asietieo, e s c u le n tiil”