o E ‘rS'E'jL B 1 9 B t l E. :: A 3 J-S|
' , 1 rte'rfegly plain and .unadorned; vyicliout painted gft&» cal'v«d ;
« i f feüïprór-èj «r tracery- 'But.wlieh.l fty it. has. no claim to.
-anÉiói3ify,;:M#uld-meatito be undérfloèd.öf.the febric in general;,
för the- p i t ó which fuppótfe&e .roof. are undoubtedly old, beingöfthaf
dbwy ^ * I p f p M
fhould imagine, upheld the roof of a former church, which,.,
falling: into decay, was. rebuilt on ‘thole maffy pretpsj ■ becauft their
ftreligth had pr-eferve* themïrom the injuries of rime . pon
•'thèfoieTÈ-blunt go&it:arches, fuchias! prevailed in the reign above.-.
mentioned,dafid-by which, as a:criterion,.:wé would prove the
-date of-the building. .................... .... ■ - •
1 • the fouth aile,-between the. «eft and louth
doors, -lands- S 'd ' 1 cwWch is deep 'an* capacwusi and. confifts.
ó f 'three'-ffiafly Wund- ftones, pile*'oneion:-:another,.withorit,tire,
léaft oïöaftenr-.milculptu.rei 'the Ê É H f t f t e t t p is;-hned: with,
.lead,' and bas' a pipe at bottom to convey o i l the water after the
facred ceremony-is performed. . r.. ' - '■ ' , •„
. The cuft-end ®f the -feuth aile is called the -South Chancel,, apd, till
■ within thèfe-thirty years, was divided off by.iold catve*
work- of timber,: having been a private chantry, In this opinion
■ I afe- More «èhfiföftd by obferving two .gothic niches^within the
fpace-, the one in the call wall and the .other in the; fouth, near.
Which there probably- ftöod inïagesiand altar^ . • . | g ‘
: .In ;the middle aile- there is nothing remarkable; but L ^
member-when it’ s beams-were hung .with garlands m honour ot
S I I « ! S f l l Mfec/^ejftómOtRe towenwefcrar^ ajpty, to, ^ m p -.
5 3 fS 7 M archite&hre .together,
; S i d .......... • ................. ‘ 1 ^