'Ext'râiftm oratïcnis.
■ D i s c e ± rïuncapertè Epicurus?fîantea
ïgnoràbat,nondo<ftus,fedconui&ûs,prquiden
tia régi vniuerfum. Quod enim mali co'n-
tknî'ncntur, pùniantür-, & poenas lùaht,rna-
liifeftunr eft indicium"nofc natuiæ temerè iàc
fruftra mentis, fed legis âtque inftituti, & fa-
tioqis adipiniftràndi^ & hoçaifîplius, i^(|ws
proaidentiareftargumentum. Iamitàque ali-
quid , Athehienfes ,commemoratione di-
gnum accidit. Venir in iudiciifm EpfcurüS
1 0 8 4
• dfg can%$
Nito /UH i g & g ? e to e i'c y a n ^ c e q
E f t i x o v & q > ow©€?Vo/l c fto i)6 fi ir k v r ) ß o X a v ^ p .
<nv i'u ^ X e ^ x& e v b ju S jj f^ h . td $
TlOVinpxqSiQjinS^ * |
vJ o j ' c h e m e i f (p s& fJ fy v fq fa p& T v w <puTecf>q> ctAAgi
S i a f j t i i ) xfVojbCii) 7röAmi&c, x}* ( T o p U y e s o v ^ a u -
w '.q thg. <z&£9 vo ia4 X&prz&gßv v w p y j
_ | k*Ai//$jb x v esr g p v f'g p u w m i y&t<pVFq > 4 v J fie $ a $% -
vultu fubtrifti, &*fuam, quarri de voluptate 10 V(Uoi,ye^^.gvyvi^<^v,ik^v\^i^xel^}v EWa-
habet | opinionem retrico vultu corrupit. ^ y TO' ^ vcfbpyjq c/Üy/fa cf)s-
Dupjici de caufa odio digniffimus.cum ?ÖK(Jas. j f ' m © J ,
« £ ^ ü « e n toV o l^ r t^ f |
quidemiabfat, vt iucunditatem exomnibüs > p e t wjPco^v
rebus colligate hie Verb gratiitatem menti- wfiv t/I v ^ p v m ^ c t j p b i ^ V 'd a . 3. <fkd
lu r, vt iudicesconciliando furripiat. Nouum e ttfM oT v ifa f^ 3 v 7W itQ iH < T ^ > *vct t/$ejprao’)t to cAm
i“ d!cium >hor* P W ? ” a™ram niup' f c Ä JÄ ? i M * e '{ ;
prouideutiahi pcenam fubit. Peril omnis vir- ™ ’ f « « * « £ g “ > f f « W ‘\
tusper dofttimtn Epicuri i&fermones. Pe- tut «Ö » Wl> « O '* » " yl^»
reuntconcilia,&iudicia)honeftatisptaemia,2-°apgw 70/? E m z i i ^ O X9 y>IQ K&I ‘fc ym& cn v'
ofyg t£n(g.<p\(Uct x} xeißi$> K9f $ ß jtßp ki
* 5fV Ltteretl
& ‘Pf* fy jcu
peragro loca
improbitatis fùpplïcium, quin & fiipraccelum
euadit impietas ^ ntillutque eft locus qui
impudentiaî & audaciæ Epicuri fit- expers.
Et nac de caufa, antiquis philolbphiæ vefti-
giisinfifterè erubuit, &-eândem quamprio-
t res t ireviam neglexit. Eorùm porrè aiiimi
yz&av &t TifAeU) 7^ à\ cMetVncov Æmgk ctyct*
ÇtttVGl cf[i û tiç &Q2VQP CLVù) ,TO/Ç tZçtyxA.IHg.<Jl ,
to7t (&* x J ï )ç i j ïç & g $ b v T H Î , Ems&û'çpv ^
voXf^r^truv cJ%Mpff@fc. to èf£- djiiûVf'il^uxjdtt
anguftiam potiflimum ineufat, qui à nobis &7ç apptioiç 'epftôvai ÇÛticotpibç oé?<V Emwu-
propter M g M M f c s puhiri font, quare ,
, omnes adhuc împietate Jongo interuailo r 7 ^ «JJ « ' p T
fuperaré parat. Cur non accußtur , qui taie M Ê Ê Ê ® Ê & I! Ê 0
ac tantum nomen ' ” aulus eftfibi aftingere f at myvnç 7^1 offoj Treip y/*&v wvii^/ç cfhyfiyioi
vbi hæc profitetur Vbinam conuenit & 30 7^.ttfzpo6^tu)Tv^ ckq?&.&wcw
wavTOÇ
commifccfur voluptas laboribus , fortitudo « S j j f e j n7f m (
deliciis ? Academia lupanaribus | philofo- ^ ^ ^ ^ ||gj 'M m '
r*hia noratmnihiis . temoefantinm vita cum
, / av* - • , ‘■SPJ V -t
phia porationibus ,tempefantium impudicis adolefcentibus ? &.quid pxasdixit,
quid aulus eft ? bellum & arma vniuerfk nature
legibus indicit, contra omnem «tatem de-
xnentiam effondit ,& deimpiis letftatoribus
eos plurimum colit, qui volupratem ante alios
demirantur.
Prius verb defenfionem eius confidere*-
mus, an dobtrinae eius pcenam exigi’s? mi
itmxvjha* *sj
AS3*l3 Si? 'tZfyTfS Q OV/u£itjV<l jMyvyy) frcfbl’h
twvojgi xtJLp’nei&^vqrj t, a ^ JiijuA a ^ 7dpvctf0 h
fymtpict fa irbfgq 3 owq>(yvxv7a>i>/8j@h , fa aMoM-
STX. fMIgSIXICt 5 0 p TJ * Gt-OptiptlMi T iroAW rO i j ,
TtvtefWv dtoiAei (£ vb/uyiq o/Vwc
Ipvaiaq* ttfgivti tfgtvisw * vhlKttu; tt7rams „d
nimfe , fed impietatis. Licet enim docere4° EmKOV^q Yi&t&n■ 7rdvimv
quod.Iibet, impio eife non licet. Si probate & £ ^ M
potesnon elieeosimpio^invetbis, verba non . •/_ >. » « c / ■ • , r,
damno f atfi verbisineft impietas.nbn pro- ^ ^ ,m*
pter ilia pcenam dabis , fecT eo magispunie- ctr7ntfvuq cfl/^q'yXXiStT^. cMnG&tij*
rc , quia ad impietatem confirmandam his ^yjt{&'n£eiV/L$fj $ cJ%ov y datCeiv 3 «x ^ r r t ^ -
verbis vfus es. Non enim pcenam in iudi- Wfyf « i p *i%{q &7n7v > aq iy, dozZ&q f i 'Mx
cio dibit3” fi quis, « ft liceat,vriadea quat „> d iiSbu Slt
oporret,adremnonconuenrentemverbisvtr - / / > ,\ \ y : \
velit: contra verb, firem honeftam rnhone-'
ftis verbis inquinarit, ob verba pcenamluer. d\twnv\y etXfo %o^gt&fi(r)i-ffheop-6?q Kfa.w
Vocamus hue in iudicium oratotes, &liquis <^n^iv (p7q Aflpo/? KAWtiortf. « y&&tTiq ^ cJ%bv } $ “
lentus accelferit, frequenter communi Ci-50 ^ a M > ydv ufti) JfidtAr)
uitatis feffragio vel rnuitu5addicendum c o - M
eitur. venit aliquis luueius vel muencula . . 1 _ , .
{ nam ob hanc tetatem przdarus ille con- * ? " f ,raP f W
uenms ordiuatus eft )-in Venerandam Epicu- m (fiiti&rit p w e ? ? *#» okv»
riicholam ,audaciafuperaciIlelxionein,fe- 7T0?hennf n JWitii Tiic 7ioA0&)c to /^i'
rocia Sabn^neum.temeritateTanralUmtYed ty ip n n V « Xiyiv 'faofifSpoi. **(*?•
bac infabulis, &pervmbram vix credimus. ^ a’C TO'
ve&>vivea$Giqydp&ijTtivhhv toi}iicw 70
• s r& v tS (q o u u e jp io v . \ a $ top l£ io p a , to & & to o q u p S g p m q > tov I c tA fx c o v s c t r b v € & v> ■
f tvX/a,m X&pybp T dpTuMv'* aM’ [Xvdvf ry cTx^jf 3 y* 3 iafi& TriT^0/^ 1’
E
tort#««)®*’ cheat pûdotç > aM’ cv Jbyfj&oi sfd no» in Epicurus, yerüm in dobtrr himeri vs.
*t; „«„»7 .,«. nis adHonibufcwe hos fuperare conuinc: VUJ (Grt’ ltt'iVlViKGlV CMCiVOiq doe^OXSTet/. XÇCXÆJPOI ~ • i ■ r -m * V / * „ ..tiarrL>eodj7rsTau^(a7 oAuii(rcLi Aeipvrcq' oi , tÆ0j s QsSuKibkujsu «il«l locis hæcr JiBlBhS BauS fi\.cf u11n _r :? - at_h_ui.
f j t y f ê h a /U« TTtTroMWi > r l u j 'ftpccoej.ctii [ obe j ox1
Q<dj%evxi : 7ïç u<pe%ei d treCa v J [ ijcIu j > a Tktj/-
7KÇ efya&t/jiï3ç ï k m ^ cicri££v’ netj'idîç %Qx-
y0fâ(joiçkcl^bv ai-n 7n(®zçj*yf&ÿ(*>y tu (Xyi m -
/S f^ y ju S f e t 4& & ,T iM & cL f. a c k 7 t u v t Û y e voluj
\yormv tuç Jfacft/oiç i y ù p \&$ -cov
•nç chc (iCStwèraL) > r'ïmofàjdcLV 'Ztr&çnzz 7romnis
abtionibufque hos fupeçare conuincitur
V7 - 7 a J ^ B B | t n s Quibus in locis hæc ilÜ aufi.funr ? alius in
$ k k p t o ™ ™ ! » A t jw w r 01 fâfi montibus_ alter in faltibusilie in barbaris
çjy i p m > °* 0 aivetyro^q > oi cf[e ov ßapbct&/q wen quibufdam & abiebtis regionibus, vt eriam
d m p ( «AiJtoffi *TTQTe locus veniam peccatis dare .videàtur. Verùm
wfypduluj KM totrov tpûcnç lyxXiif^tinv. ) Ettj- Epicurus hæc docet Athenis, Athenas cum di-
X S L ^ B t U t i» 5m p *m p * < f e « W ÿ “ > P^'ätiscput intelligp. Numtibi vide- •
1 v / 7 - JP- fi / ‘ y tur Socrates , quem lmitens, dienus? Et quid.
fMTtw CiTTOVTViç d x n S w Wi<pa- dignum ,inquit, cur reus fim commifi? Hoc-
AçLfOP' dtfip o ^eax^twiç coi obwCi fM(/,i\cnv 3 eine mihi ais,Epicure? maiusiamcrimen eft,
x p j W i (puff f V7T<iljdvvav viaiCyicm \ cwto f/ßt 10 non impietatis modo , .fed qui a nunc ctiam
Xtviç 3 ETnxovpe to fJüùÇpvS eynXti##, , owpth nouum.adiungis. Vnde iamduplici de caufa
n Ar. / > d v ' Jew .A reus tactus es.. Aras non euertifti? at eas fiu-
“n ° ” ^ ' ftra oftendifti J cdm prouidentiam e r c
vyrdidw©"*- ßtoftuq ctsxc eute^eyjuç, aAAfls rum natura tollis, ob quâm aras exftcuximus ,
ujtjm/ èça'rcLç ‘éehi^aq > <z&&poiav cdeAap , 01 facrificianoua non introduxifti? at omnia fu-
'Üj/ ßapciq iJfivemy^dtt.* dvoiew f^ v lm * che ftulifti . Non abfoluatur Epicurus, qui a non
idverat > ÙAA& Tmtreoç cwnpwaq.* ytjcfî pué&eu eadem quæ priores de Diis fenfit. Fieri enim
/ ,, / v ti \ ' M non potelt,vtvnusinvrbeciuis omnibus momç
f f â l é x B dis ftr impins, ft veto vnufquifquc pro his quæ
n&P v $ S t m m > ; ytp f€cit adducens eaquænonfecit, fupplicium
Ä!7g£«GW/ ^07T8Ç > èv) Kp 7‘tw 7TQÀIV ctJbpcf euadet , quis impietatis poenas dabit- ? Gùm
fTT.v. & 'itluç©* ttv& m eJl&iere ®£p^aAAo*10 nu^ Enc oninino. impij, èc iiceat reis pro malefabtis
benefabta proferre. Non^func à fa- | mft,U$nu
pientibqs hæ fruftrationes t admittendæ.Non H.suph.
enim adhibenda defenfio eft eorum, de qui-
bus quis non.accufatur, verùm de quibus^o-
ram iudicibus accufarur,&obquædifcepta-
tores fedenr.Uli verb,æquilïimis omilïis,ad fa-
cillimadflabuntur. Æquiâimum enim eft ob-
ieçlum diluere : facilliinum ea defenderc., de
..... ; f s «, ,< , .• „• qtlibus non. accufatur. Si iginir quia poenas
Ênt] 1 asAA €(p o/ç 01 n x&evovTsqxuTtiyßgpuenpj nondum de.difti, ideb prouidentiam nègas?
ôi. n c^ffCT^opjeç xçfâtoftdity*. 01 J[s depsvnç to dï~ reblè iudi cafti : fin propter nàturam vniiierïi,
Keybitt/gv> ’fhtTopdsovßetefi^xen. ip 'fjâ/j yup c/}- 30 .^e<I vnde hanc de atomis & Chao
« t f y L i i U n i X m u * e in r« i : adeo trlt° . opjwoncm inuenifti | inordinuta
\ttv‘ * v, > „X , , ,* > •> quædamvolutio, & motus hoc vniuerfum tur-
TO pusop^ 3 > yroAQyet&q Ä W ojç a bat, & antiquum chaos eft, & tuis verbis an-
<p£y<l wç çPijneu;' « fÂp i^ ow yŸ\ mediJhyjtq tiquius,neque definirisnaturæ legibusobtem-
Jl/nduu ; chcîj) po/M^etq z&fÿvoiaur opdaç ßs€ i- perat.Porrb autem omnia ordine procedunt,
AdiQTLf : e? J i 5 tîij> ■ epvatp ^ ûAcov , b Siu^ maximum prouidentiæ argumentum
. 1 <îa ' /o_ ' T.F ’ ~ puto, ..omnia fcilicetconferuari ■; nam inor* CtMCU TTO-JiV, <s^gq l y i (LTOUCÙV fa Th ^ , , r t , • ^ . / 7- ' / \ ,v> dmatio corruptionem : ordo ve.ro conferuayotmq
tu ,7roÀv<TpuXhti($v , wxuthp tjip àoçta tionem indueit.
tfc&pmuç ï oeSnnôç wç cfO^Aeî rlw rfîoÀoep Quid adimisDelphis, ficut & coelo, pro-
epûcnv Qé&i -fa. Mvtieiç’ aXß ap%t7ov to %t(§h, uidentiam î veruntamen ipouebatur Parnaf. 1
m W ca t ÄsWiBW&me* !'- M j y i W t - « ff * & “ “ “ »Pa& s iaciebkmtt mominm veci
n 7% c 0/ / <** i, . a . v7- fo Vertices pro telis torquebantur. Cecide*
f â ^ e i ^ o i ç to^ iç t»ç fjo t& ç- KMylw re aucem Pe^ æ # Z per; is fepuki. Veiùm
N aTiuvQb ^cfj TOÇ«-^»p«* KM oe a v o w &v- cùm Epicurus hæc in Deos dice*e audeat,
inç y&yiçov oiucu Texyw.ÇjLOp > To 7rztvTd ozéçe^: montes non concutiuntur , noh Hyinems
etTctï'ict pSf)yetp (ßSofätv, tu^iç cfi otow'iÇj.ax fp- euibra'tur ? non fulmina, nontonitrua hunC
d & t t * Ti m M t ^ A X f S r , â ( I/? K Vnicum Academia hominumocalis-eripianr.
t \ 1 , -7- 0 ' ' Callidum Deorum. înuentum .intelJigo,
^ 9 0 « » « S ï » o p j fm * * * * hune veftris iudiciis rercmamnt , vt Athc-
KM tip mpemv CM&echtmiv xapuepeu• c/[g ogpv nienfis Senatus eadem quæ Pythius vatesAetvwßfycop
iiffPdCovTO' Trtpcretf ePi %7n7iïbp, wxtpotç polio décernât. Si vel tantummodbfcribere
S/ç 7Te^aefQi, ^nadfJ^fJOTc ETnxovç^v aufus ftùftet, quantum fatis eilet ad tollenda
A i* « « ® t - f r - t k S m p A * ® « , cùz ’é d c i l - J prouidentiæ figna,puniendas fuiflet vt impiui.
, „ rfK - ft / ’ «v 5° bi autem in earn iplam prouidentiam împius
T«1 , .o ^ r w f o t™ r x & Jb ‘n r * !i OV ispm - fit j cuiUs fimulacra fcnt cerium, terra, cle-
fiç ■> ottJli aieytirlo) aorri ThGv ctxacDi/Utûi aiwct- mentorumque naturæ : an parcemus tanquam
^av/çot/OT \ aumrijtM to ’j f f î dieSv', modicumfacinus patrarit? BeneCnimeft,inmwi&
tiç l ^ o i ç Æ y ewptieruv , f c drwzèp 4uit » improbis : at quænam tarnen maior im-
W m 9 ^ ß o u X d n fo .. « ^ 4 v. P a t a t e infelîcitasîmalè verb eftfapientibus.
/u&vovèTÔAytierep,000V *xct$UipeiV
tto iniç oer&vobaç dytA/e^cTU : t<hi eftJtivdf JltMiv &>ç àteQwajfi&ï «’ cA eiç cuittip mûyluû <tai£(ï>
.nçKÇpvbç km yüt x} çoifêicop (pyojç, dydXyge.ju : (&çy&‘fiov w J[ç 4 t7ztf Jfopovdfvr®* <p^aôfu^u‘,
w'njymïm yàp ,,<pfjenp , 01 uetteo}* km ™ xuxJctç ftäfyp dbçô^iyet 3 Jbçvyoiïoi yàp oî ootpou
TL t. %
lia
HUB