
 
        
         
		I:  M l  ■  Mi 
 G L E IC H E N IA   IMMERSA. 
 F I L I C E S .— G l e i c h e n e æ .  B?-.,  Kaulf.  S c i i i s m a t o p t e r i d e s .  Willd. 
 G en .  C h a r .  G L E I C H E N I A .   C a p su la   a n n u lo   c om p le to   s tr ia to   subse ssilc s  in so ris   rotundçitis  
 do rsa lib u s  sæ pius  de finitæ.  In d u s ium   n u llum .  F ro n d e s  d ich o tom æ   v e l  furc a tæ . 
 G l e ic h en ia   im m e rsa ;  fronde  dichotoma ramosa,  gemma  primaria  prolifera, pinnis  gemiuatis  pro-  
 fundc pinnatifidis, laciniis  linearibus  subtus  costa  utrinque ferrugineo-tomentosis,  ramis  semi-  
 pinnatifidis, soris minutis tomento  immersis.  K a u lf. 
 M e r te n s ia   im m e rsa .  K a u l f .  E n u m .  F il. p .  38. 
 H ab.  In Brasiliæ Insula St. Catharinæ.  Chamisso.  Insula Sancti Vincentii.  R e v . L .   G u ild in g . 
 Ex  insula Guadeloupe communicavit  Cl.  T o r r e y . 
 Stipes repetitim  dichotomus,  primum pubescens,  demum glaber,  nitidus,  fuscus,  ex axillis proliferus,  ramis  ultimis  
 (et antepenultimis, Mnc)  frondosis. 
 Frondes  geminato-furcatoe,  lanceolata:,  basi  apiceque  subattenuata:,  6-unciales  ad  sesquipedalem  longæ,  supra  
 glabræ,  subtus ferrugineo-tomentosæ,  profonde  fere  ad  basin  pinnatifidæ,  segmentis  linearibus  liorizontaîi-  
 subfalcatis, marginibus  omnino integen-imis.  Rachis  demum glabriuscula.  Costa  pubescens. 
 Sort  tomento ferrugineo immersi,  e capsulis quatuor radiatim dispositis,  sphæricis,  fere  omnino  sessilibus,  oblique  
 subverticafiter lato annulatis demum  e vertice dehiscentìbus. 
 Semina  oblongo-reniformia,  parva. 
 Fig.  1.  Portio frondis  ab  inferiore  parte  visa.  f.  2.  Ejusdem  portio,  cum soris.  f.  3.  Portio  segmenti,  tomento  
 abraso,  cum  soro capsulis  duabus.  f. 4.  Capsulæ.  f.  S.  Semina:—magn.  auct. 
 This  seems  to agree  so  well  with  the M e r te n s ia   im m e rsa   of  Kaulfuss,  that  wc  can  have  little  
 doubt of the two plants being the same.  It  is  possible that it may be the  M .   p u b e s c en s   of Humboldt  
 and Willdenow;  though that is  said to  be  clothed  beneath  with  white  down.  Again,  the  
 M .   bifida  of the same author has many points  in common with this ;  but according to  the figure in  
 A e t .  H o lm ,  the branch  immediately  below  the  ultimate  one  is  pinnatifid on  each side.  May not  
 this be the M .   d e cu iren s  of Raddi ?