
 
        
         
		lay down, but that might have been  from  dejection  or  headache, as I could see no wound on him when  I  
 put him up ;  but  anyhow, as  far  as  I  am  concerned, I  feel  that  Sir  Edwin  Landseer  is  avenged on his  
 critics.—W. H.  Grenfell  (Loch Assynt Lodge,  Sutherland,  14th October). 
 Shortly  afterwards Mr.  Grenfell  sent  the  piece  of  horn  up  to  the  Field office, and Mr.  
 J. E.  Harting and  I  examined  it  closely.  There was  not  the very  least  doubt that  there had 
 recently been  a  quantity  o f dark  liquid,  resembling blood,  in  the  pores  o f the  horn  itself,, and  
 which  had  afterwards  become  dried  in  the  horn  in a  congealed  mass.  This  certainly  goes  
 against popular belief that when  the  horn  o f   a deer  is  once formed  it  is  so much  dead matter,  
 through which  no  life  permeates,  but  I  have  always  believed  that  a  certain  amount  o f oily  
 matter  still  existed  in  deer  horns  years  and  years  after  the  animal  has  been  shot  and  is  
 hanging  as  a  trophy  on  the walls,  and  I  believe  that  almost  any  stag  that  is  shot  through  the  
 horn  in  the  early  part  o f  the  season,  that  is  to  say  soon  after  the  head  is  complete,  would  
 gather  congealed  blood,  or  something  resembling  it,  round  the  parts  where  the  bullet  has 
 struck,  i f   given  time  to  do  so.  Sir  Edmund  Loder  fired  at  a  stag  in  Kintail  in  1894  ;  the  
 projectile  struck  and  pierced  the  left  horn  just  above  the  coronet,  and  the  animal  fell  over  
 stunned  for  the moment.;  he,  however,  quickly  recovered  and was  soon  out  o f   sight.  Four  
 or  five  days  afterwards,  however,  the  stag, which  had  a  marked  peculiarity  and was  easily  
 recognisable,  walked  right  up  to  the  same  sportsman  again  and  was  killed.  T h e   sides  o f the  
 horn,  round  the  old  bullet-holè,  were  entirely  covered  with  congealed  blood. 
 In  the  early part  o f   the  season  I  do  not  think  that,  though  insensible,  the horns  are  any  
 more  dead,  in  the  strictest  sense  o f  the  term,  than  the winter feathers  o f  wading  birds  are  in 
 the  spring,  as  the  American  naturalists would  have  us  believe.  A   certain  communication  
 still  seems  to  exist  through  the  pedicle  with  the  vital  forces,  but  its  effects  are  not  immediately  
 apparent  to  the  eye.  When  one  saws  the  horns  off  a  deer  in  the winter,  or  even  
 earlier,  we  see  nothing  to  induce  us  to  suppose  there  is  any  sign  o f   nerves,  pulses,  or  
 traversing  fluids.  T h e  whole  is  as  hard  and  dry  as  a  Boer  sermon.  What  one would  like  
 to  see  are  the  horns  sawn  across  in  the  middle  above  the  tray  shortly  after  completion,  and  
 left  on  the  head  o f  the  stag  ;  then,  I  cannot  help  thinking,  we  should  find  something  
 exuding.  Next  season  I  hope  to  try  some  experiments  in  this  line. 
 There  is  no  doubt  that  certain  fluids  do  exist  in  deer  horns  for  years which  are  not  
 apparent  at  the  time  o f death.  M y  reader  has  probably  some  stags’  heads  hanging up  on  his