
 
        
         
		who obeyed respectively the sceptre of th$ Incas,  
 and  of  th7e  princes  of Anahuac,  have Jpdeed  
 enlisted  a wider  sympathy and  risen to  higher  
 fame in the world’s history,  but it  lias been the  
 famé earned  by the tabors and  arts of subdued  
 multitudes,  and  the  sympathy  consequent  on  
 overwhelming  national  misfortune;  this  isHhe s  
 difference  between*tjije.  .empires  qf  Peru  and  
 Mexico,  and thé  high-toned  Iroquois  republic ;  
 but neither letters,Christianity, nor liberty, have  
 cause to lament the  fall of the two  formeif’em-  
 ppfes;  Æ   wisdom  by  which  the; 
 Iroquois met  and  resisted'ihévinröads of European  
 power,  and  prevented  thè. ovett-ùrning Of  
 their-institutions* furnishes the highest evidence  
 of their superiority as an active, thinking race ©f  
 men.  They yjatched,^ witlf eagle glance,  encroachments  
 upon  their «national  rights.  They  
 kept their central council fire at Onondaga bright,  
 and  off en  met  from  all  the Cantons*  from  the  
 east and west, to deliberate On their affairs ;  and  
 when*à war was resolved on against a  trespassing  
 or  impinging foe*  of  their  own  race,  they  
 concentrated every effort to carry it on, and flew  
 to the contest to root up, and tear out their riâfne  
 and placé  among -men.  '‘Ko  leading  event,  in  
 fine,  in  thè  history  of  the.  colonies,  has  beétt 
 consummated without the power, in peace or war,  
 of the  Iroquois.  They were  present under  the  
 British, standard,  at the siege of Niagara,  at the  
 overthrow of Baron  Dei'skau,  at  Lake  George,  
 arid  at  the  fall of Montcalm  at  Quebec.  The  
 colonies of Virginia, Maryland,  and Pennsylvania, 
  felt the strong influence of the policy of their  
 Confederacy.  In  any  political  scheme  of  the  
 colonics; the course of the Iroquois, in the question  
 at issue, was èver one of the deepest moment,  
 and he must be a careless, reader of history, who  
 dóes  not  perceive  how  vital  âù  element  they  
 fecame in all the interior transactions, between  
 A. D,  1600,  at the  general  period of the settlement  
 of the colonies^  and  the  close of the war  
 of American, Independence. 
 The. stirring events offtheir wars are mingled,  
 more or less, with the^hisfbry of each of th%colo-  
 nies, and impart to them much of their interest.  
 To  extract  them  and  set  them  in  order,  as  a  
 branch of American history, would  constitute a  
 theme of no ordinary attraction.*  But the task  
 I haé%takeri in hand did not contemplate a  his- 
 I'  It is fö  be regretted,,that Colden, who viewed the subject  
 •iö"thisrIighqr:dTops.his'  excellent  outlines,  (soessential to all  
 who wish, ta study the Iroquois history), with  the antique date  
 of the^peaeç  of  Ryswick,  A. D.  1697,  a period, when, indeed,  
 their republic had  hardly cuhninated.