
 
        
         
		means of prefixed syllables, the root  of the verb being insusceptible  
 of any change.  - 
 In the formation likewise of verbal  nouns  and derivatives,,  
 and in nouns expressing relations,  the  Coptic  makes  an  extensive  
 use of prefixes; and this observation is of the greatest  
 importance to my present purpose,  as  it is equally applicable  
 to the Kafir,  and probably to  other  African  languages.  All  
 such  modifications  as  the  European  languages  express  by  
 terminations  added  to  verbs  are  denoted  in  the  Coptic  by  
 these prefixes..  Thus the prefix MAD-indicates abstracts, ref  
 is equivalent to our er  in maker or to or  in orator,  the prefix  
 jin  to ion in creation-;  sa  indicates  habit,  as ax in mendax,  
 scha  intensity;  ram,  is a  national  prefix,  as  Ram-chimi,  
 an  Egyptian, from Chymi,  Egypt.*  - In like manner,  as we  
 are assured by Mr.  Boyce, by prefixes to the verbal root, with  
 sometimes a slight change in terminating,  the Kafir language  
 forms  nouns  verbal,  abstract,  concrete,  which, .  though  
 never heard before,  would  be  immediately understood  by an  
 individual  who  knew  the meaning  of the^verbs from which  
 they  were  derived.  Thus  in  Kafir from  hambaf  to walk,  
 comes, umhambi, a walker; from lumka, beware, cave, comes  
 ubu-lumku, wisdom or caution, umlumki  or  ilumkoj  a  wise  
 man.-f* 
 Resources are hot  yet in existence for instituting a general  
 comparison  of the  languages  of Africa.  Many  years  will  
 probably elapse before it will be possible to produce such  an  
 analysis  of  these  languages,  investigated  in  their  grammatical  
 structure, as it isdesirable to possess, or even to compare  
 them  by extensive  collections of  well-arranged  vocabularies  
 after  the  manner of  Klaproth’s Asia Polyglotta.  Sufficient  
 data  however  are  extant,  and  I  trust  that  I  have adduced  
 evidence to render  it extremely probable  that  a  principle of  
 analogy  in  structure  prevails  extensively  among  the  native  
 idioms of Africa.  They are  probably allied, not in  the manner  
 or degree in  which  Semitic or Indo-European  idioms resemble  
 each other, but  by strong  analogies  in  their  general  
 principles of structure, which may be compared to those  dis- 
 *  Vater. iii.  s. 89. •f*  Kafir Grammar,  p.  3. 
 coverable between the individual members of  two other great  
 classes of Ihng'uages, by no means connected among themselves  
 by what is called family reflation;  I  allude to the monosyllabic  
 and  the  polysynthetic  languages;)  the  former  prevalent  in  
 Eastern Asia, the latter throughput the vast regions of the New  
 World.  If  we have sufficient bv^dehce for constituting such a  
 class of dialects under the title of African languages, we have  
 likewise  reason—and it is equal  in ‘degree^—for associating in  
 this »class  the language of the  ancient Egyptians.* 
 Section.  VI.—Further  Considerations  resulting from  the  
 contents  of the  preceding Sections.—On  the Diversity of  
 Languages  among  ancient  Nation s .-^Conclusion  as  to  
 the Relation of the Egyptians to other Human Races.  1 
 The.almost,entire diversity of language which distinguishes  
 the Egyptians from the nations of  Asia,nrendefsr.it extremely  
 difficult, upon any probable suppositiori;jt0)eXplain the marks  
 of intimate relation which  in  so  many :other ^respects-; appear  
 to connect  the  ancient  dwellers :$$($$$'  Nile , with  the  immemorial  
 inhabitants of  India. 
 There are  many persons  who will. bet disposed  tóf gpt  rid  
 of  all difficulties: connected  with  this  inquiiry, by denying-or  
 explaining. in  a  summary  way  the  phenomena  from * which  
 they  result.  On  recognising,  the  fact,  that  the  Egyptian  
 and  Indian languages are wholly unconnected,.they will conclude  
 at once that there  was  no.  intimate; .redation in ancient  
 times  between  the  nations  themselvekp  They will  attribute  
 to merely accidental  coincidence, or  to  the effects ^resulting  
 from  similar  local  circumstances  or  external  conditions, all 
 «  An extensive  field  of  inquiry is  opened b y  the  observation  that traces exist  
 among  the  most  distant African nations  of  ancient  connexion;  with  the Egyptians. 
   I jail all not venture to do  more  than to, call  the  attention of‘my readers to  
 this  suggestion.  The  traces  of  animal  worship,  the belief  in  metempsychosis,  
 circumcision and a variety of  observances recorded  by'travellers among the Kafirs,  
 the native people of Madagascar, as well as  among  tribes  in  the  western parts  of  
 Africa  are too extensively diffused, arid occur in too many instances  to be attributed  
 to  accidental coincidence.'  .