BUPHUS COMATUS.
Squacco Heron.
Ar dea cornata, Pall. Reise, tom. ii. p. 715.
ralloides, Scop. Ann. Hist. Nat., tom. i. no. 121.
squaiotta, castanea, et erythropus, Gmel. edit. Linn. Syst. Nat., tom. i. pp. 633, 634.
— audax, La Peyr. Neue Schwed. Abh., tom. iii. p. 306.
— Marsigti, Lepechin, Nov. Comm. Petrop., tóm. xiv. p. 502, tab. 14. fig. 1.
— pumila, Lepechin, ibid., p. 502.
Ardeola ralloides, Boie, Isis, 1822, p. 559.
Buphus comatus, Boie, Isis, 1826, p. 356.
:— castaneus et ralloides, Brehm, Vög:|E)eutschl. p. 589.
— :---- Illyriern, Brehm, ib , p. 590, tab. 31. fig. 1.
Egretta cornata, Swains. Class, of Birds, vol. ii. p. 354.
Botaurus comatus, Macgill. Man. of Nat. Hist., Orn., vol. ii. p. 125.
Caticrophagus ralloides (Boie), Kaup, Naturi. Syst., p. 42.
O n the banks of Old Father Thames, within twenty-five miles of London, the pleasure-seeker may gratify
his taste by land or by water, and the lover of nature may revel in the varied character o f the scenery.
Such woods, waters, and meads as those of Taplow, Cliveden, and Hedsor, my own favourite resorts for
observation, form such an elysium for the naturalist as rarely occurs. I was once standing at the door of
the celebrated inn o f this charming locality, when a person in the garb o f a gentleman hurried out and
eagerly inquired for the next train to London, adding th at one hour a t Temple Bar was worth twelve
months’ life in the country. F o r myself I would not care if I never saw the old Temple Gate again, and
would at any time leave the hurried Babel of London to hear the song o f the Thrush or witness the skipping
o f the Bleak before the huge Trout of our queen of rivers; but he and I, with hundreds o f others, each
having his especial liking, are essential to make up a world. Among birds this diversity is shown in
another manner; for their nature, aud not their tastes, prompts each kind to affect the especial locality for
which it was designed—some the mountain-tops, others the forest, the marsh, and the sea-shore. They are
equally-diversified in their colours and adornments,—those of the tropics being dressed in modest as well as
brilliant hues, those of the snow-clad mountain in spotless as well as glittering tints, those of the stagnant
waters being adorned with hues as beautiful as any o f the others, while those of the seas are not wanting in
variety o f colouring.
I t is in the. swamp, in the stagnant marsh, in the still waters, where the newt wriggles in the warm
shallows, and the frog croaks in the rush-beds, where the buckbean flourishes, the flowering rush raises its
stately head, and the forget-me-not carpets the margin, that the beautiful bird figured in the accompanying
Plate loves to dwell; for there it finds both security and an abundant supply o f food. It is in such
situations, in Southern Europe, that it is by no means uncommon; and it has several times been killed in
the British islands; to us, however, it is only a casual visitor, and it must therefore be regarded as one of
the rarities of our avifauna.
Although most o f the English counties, from Cornwall to the border, have from time to time been favoured
with its presence, there is none in which it has been more frequently seen than in those o f Norfolk and Suffolk.
Speaking o f Cornish localities in which it has occurred, Mr. Rodd enumerates St. Hilary, St. Levan, Sennen,
Trereife, Madron, and Scilfy, and adds that the examples obtaiued were generally in immature plumage, but
some o f them had the occipital and dorsal plumes partly developed. Mr. R. C. Musgrave informs me that
a specimen in his father’s, Sir George Musgrave’s, possession was shot by one of his gamekeepers in June
1845 while perched on a tree a t Lazonby, in Cumberland.
Mr. Stevenson, to whom I am indebted for so many notes on the birds o f Norfolk, writes me word that
the first recorded instance o f its occurrence in that county is in Messrs.Paget’s ‘ Sketch of the Natural
History o f Yarmouth,’ in which it is stated that “ one was caught in a bow-net hanging out to dry, by
Ormesby Broad in Ju ly 1820.” In May 1831 another was shot a t Oulton, near Lowestoft, in Suffolk,
and is now in the collection of Mr. J . H. Gurney, a t. Catton, A third, killed a t Ormesby or Filby,
two adjoining Broads, on the 12th of June 1834, is described in Dr. Hooker’s MS. as a “ singularly
beautiful specimen,” and was purchased by Captain Chawner of Alton, Hants, who was at that time ^collecting
a t Yarmouth. This bird is likewise referred to in some MS. notes of the late Mr. Lombe, whose
^splendid collection of British Birds is still in the possession of his daughter, Mrs. E. P . Clarke of Wymondham.
In these notes, which were made in Mr. Lombe’s copy of “ Bewick,” I also find a record of a fourth example,