
 
        
         
		/  V 
 PCECILE  PALUSTRIS . 
 Marsh-Tit. 
 Pams palustris, Linn.  Faun. Suec., p.  98. 
 —   atricapillus,  Gmel.  edit. Linn. Syst. Nat., tom.  i. p.  1008. 
 —  salicarius, Brehm, Vög. Deutschi., tom.  i. p. 465. 
 Piecile palustris, Kaup, Natiirl. Syst., p.  114. 
 W h e t h e r   it be  or be not to  tbe  advancement  of  ornithological science that such minute differences  as  those  
 which  are  observable  in  the Marsh- and Coal Tits  shoulcb'be  indicated  by a   distinct  generic  appellation  is  
 very questionable ;  certain  it  is,  however, that those  birds  are now considered  to be generically distinct,  the  
 term  Poecile  being  assigned  to  the former,  and  that  o f Parus retained for the latter.  In  habits and  general  
 economy the  two birds  are very similar ;  but a remarkable  difference  occurs  in  the  colouring of their young,  
 immature  birds  of  the Marsh-Tit and of  all the other members  of the  genus  Pcecile assuming from  the  first  
 the appearance o f the  adult, while the cheeks  of the youthful Tits  of Parus major, P. ater, and P . caeruleus are  
 strongly  stained with  yellow  during  the  first  month  after they  have  left the  nest,  in lieu of  the white  seen  
 in  tbe  adult.  This  remarkable  difference  may  not  have  been  generally  noticed;  but  that  it  really  occurs  
 may  be verified  by any  one willing to  investigate  the subject. 
 The  members  o f the  genus  Poecile  have  longer  feathers  and  a much  denser  plumage  than  tbe true Pari,  
 are  less  sprightly and  active  in  their actions,  and  do not cling or hang so much  to  the ends of  branches and  
 leaves  in  search  of  insects :  a t least  these  are  the  differences which  have  been  noticed between  the Marsh-  
 and Coal Tits  of our  island. 
 The Marsh-Tit  is  very generally  dispersed  over England  and  Ireland  from  north  to  south,  but  becomes  
 more  scarce  as  we  proceed  into  Scotland,  being  rarely  found  between  Edinburgh  and  the  border,  and  
 altogether  absent  from  some  parts  o f  the  north.  St.  John  states  that  it  is  found  in  the  fir-woods  of  
 Morayshire in winter;  Macgillivray was  not  aware  that  it  bad  been  met with  further  north  than  Fifeshire;  
 and  the  Duke  o f Argyll  writes  to  me,  “ I  have  never  seen  it  in  Argyll-  or  Dumbartonshire,  whilst  its  
 closely  allied  congener,  the  Coal Tit,  is  very  abundant.  This  is  a  curious  case  of  restricted  distribution,  
 which  it  is  difficult  to  connect with  any special  conditions  o f  food  or  climate.  In  the  neighbourhood  of  
 London  the Coal  and Marsh Tits seem  equally common;  nor have I observed  that,  in England, marsh-lands  
 are  at  all  peculiarly  the  habitat  of  the Marsh-Tit.  I may  add  that  I  have never observed  the Marsh-Tit in  
 Scotland  at  a ll;  but  my  opportunities  of  observation  have  been  chiefly  in  the  western  counties.  I t  is  
 undoubtedly a  rare  bird in  Scotland generally.” 
 Several  species  of  the  genus  Poecile  inhabit  Europe,  and  others  America.  Most  of  them  affect  the  
 northern  portions  of  their  respective  continents;  and  hence  it  is  that  I  am  surprised  to  find that  the 
 Marsh-Tit  is comparatively rare in  Scotland.  On  the  contiuent  it  is  very generally dispersed,  and is  doubtless  
 found  as far north  as  Sweden  and Norway,  where  it meets its  close ally the Poecile borealis. 
 There  is  no  difference  whatever  in  the  colouring  o f  the  sexes,  and  they  differ  so  little  in size  that 
 dissection must be  resorted  to  to distinguish  one from  the other. 
 The Marsh-, like  the Coal Tit,  inhabits  all  the great woods  in  the  neighbourhood o f the Thames and  other  
 parts o f England;  it  also  frequents  coppices,  hedge-rows,  and  swampy  grounds;  and  I  have  not  failed  to  
 observe  that  it  affects  the  lower  trees  and  shaws,  while  the Coal T it  resorts  to the  higher  branches o f tall  
 beech  trees  in  chalky  districts,  as well  as  those  of flat  alluvial  land:  not  so,  however,  the Marsh-Tit;  for  
 although  not excluded  from  such  situations,  it  is  less frequently found  there. 
 In  its nesting  and  in  its general mode  of  nidification  it also  slightly differs from  its  frequent associate the  
 Coal Tit,  the  nest  being  generally  placed  in  a   stub  near  tbe  grouud,  or  in  a   bank-side.  It varies  in  size  
 according to  the nature o f the  situation  in  which  it  is placed,  being sometimes  as small  as a  cricket-ball,  at  
 others  half the size o f a man’s  hat.  Rabbits’  down  is  a   favourite material,  and I  have seen  nests composed  
 almost  entirely  of  it.  One  taken  from  a   hole  in  a   birch  tree  was  compact,  cup-shaped,  smooth  both  
 externally  and  internally,  and  mainly  composed  of  rabbits’  hair,  interwoven  on  the  inner side with minute  
 chips  o f dried grasses,  and  on  the  outer  side with  fine moss;  another,  taken  a t Formosa,  in Berkshire, was  
 a   thick  matted  structure  of moss  and  dogs’  hair,  tbe  former  predominating  on  the  outside,  and  the  hair  
 inside.  As  an  instance  of the  great care  some  birds  take  to  prevent the  detection  of their  nests, Mr.  Bond  
 tells me  that he once  observed  a  pair of Marsh-Tits, who were  excavating a hole in  an  old tree as a  place  of  
 deposit for  their  intended  nest,  carefully  carry  away  the  bits  of wood  in  their  beak  one  by one,  fly over a  
 neighbouring  hedge,  and  there  drop  them—a   trait  in  the  bird’s  economy which  is  not  generally  known,