
 
        
         
		now  I  have  shrunk  from  admitting  it.  It was  first  noticed  
 as  deserving  of  attention  at  the  Meeting  of  the  British  
 Association  at  Bristol,  in  1836,  and  was  then  erroneously  
 supposed  to  be  U. provincialis  (Bab. FI. Bathon.  73).  It  is  
 the  U.  nanus of most British  collectors;  for the  true plant of  
 that  name  is  very  far  from  common,  and  the  U.  Gallii  is  
 universally distributed throughout the south-western counties  
 of  England,  and  constitutes  a  very  large  part  of  the Gorse  
 of  Ireland.  Mr.  P.  B. Webb  remarked  “ totam  Hiberniam  
 operit.”  It is  also found  in the  south-west of  Scotland.  In  
 its  larger  form it closely resembles  U.  europaus,  and  is  then  
 usually  so  called.  It may be known  from that  species by its  
 flowering  in  the  autumn, having  a  silky  (not  shaggy)  calyx,  
 very  small  bracts,  and  glabrous,  although  strongly  ciliate,  
 leaves  (phyllodia);  from  U.  nanus  by  its  strong,  erect,  or  
 ascending,  branches,  long  and  strong  but  deflexed  spines  
 (ramuli),  wings  rather  longer  than  the  keel  of  the  flower,  
 although  often  seeming  shorter  than  it  from  their  somewhat  
 falcate shape, causing them to appear as if “ trying to embrace  
 by  arching over the keel,” whereas  in  U.  nanus they are  very  
 nearly  straight  and  flatly applied  to  the  keel.  The  flowers  
 are  usually  of  an  orange-yellow  tint,  but  the  late  Prof. E.  
 Forbes  told  us  (Bot.  Gaz.  v. 1.  291)  that  that  colour  is  not  
 constant  even  on  the  same  bush.  The  U.  nanus  is  almost  
 always  quite  prostrate  below;  but  the  flowering  ends  of  its  
 branches  turn up,  and  the whole  forms  an  elastic carpet of  a  
 few  inches  in  thickness over  the  exposed  heaths of the west:  
 U.  Gallii  does  occasionally  present  a  rather  similar  appearance, 
   but  is  nearly  always  very  much  more  erect,  and  is  
 sometimes even  5  or 6  feet high. 
 The  specimens  from which our  figure was made were  sent  
 from  Durdham  Down,  near  Bristol,  on  Oct.  13,  1849,  by  
 Mr.  H.  O.  Stephens.—C.  C.  B.