
 
        
         
		[ 3 
 From  what  has  been  advanced,  it  appears,  that  Nature,  in  the  formation  and  ilrufture  of  this  
 branch  o f  the  algas,  has deviated  from  Her  general mode o f  operation :  and  as  there  are  not  any  
 proofs  produced o f  a ftate o f  florefcence  attending thefe  plants ;  it  is  highly  probable,  that,  in  this  
 inftance,  She may  have  recourfe  to  a  fimple  and felf-efficient mode o f  propagation,  independent o f  
 any  external  acceflbrial aid,  and  totally different from  the principle,  on which  the  fexual  fyftem  is  
 founded.  It may be  proper to obferve,  that this opinion is  flieltered under the  authorities  o f  Gmelin  
 and  Gartner;  although  the  latter o f  thefe authors  fcems  to extend  his liypothefis,  in too general and  
 exclufive  a manner;  as  will  poflibly be  Ihown  in  the  fubfequent pages. 
 Gmelin,  in  the  courfe  o f  his  remarks,  obferves,  that  it would  not be lefs abfurd  to require,  than  
 difficult  to  attempt  an  explanation o f  the  natural  procefs,  which takes  place,  in  the original  formation  
 o f  the granulated veffels,  difcovered in  the  fucufes.  We  muft  ever  be  at  a  lofs,  when we  approach  
 towards  the  firft principles  of  any  efficient  caufe.  The fame inexplicable difficulties  occur in  
 the  regenerating fprings  o f  animal  life.  All that can  rationally be  afferted,  is,  that  from thefe  and  
 fimilar  obfervations,  it appears,  that it hath  pleafed  the  Great  Author  o f  Nature,  to  produce  the  
 fame  effefts,  by  a more  fimple  procefs  in fome  inftances,  than  in  others :  and  that,  in  the  various  
 fpecies  now  under confideration,  it ihould feem to  be ordained,  that  a  felf-efficient  power,  effentially  
 exifting in thefe plants,  anfwers every purpofe  conducive  to  their propagation. 
 For a more  particular  elucidation  of  this  fubjeft,  it  may  be  proper  to  confult  the  work  o f  
 Gmelin,  who  further  obferves,  that  in  the plants now under confideration,  a  gradual  proceis  may  
 be  traced  from  thofe,  which  are  u n i s e x u a l , ”   to  others  ftill  more  fimple,  and  which  are  per-  
 feftly  ASEXUAL. 
 To  the  firft  of  thefe diftinftions,"   Gaertner attributes the  fruftification o f the more perfeft fucufes,  
 which he maintains  are  propagated by  a£lual  feeds.  Under  the  latter divifion,  the  fame  author  has  
 decidedly fixed many o f   the fucufes,  and  all  the confervas without exception. 
 tory called  Canaille  in  Provence,  at the diftance of  five hundred fathom from the ihore,  and  at  the  depth  of  forty,  entangled  in  a  fifiiing-net.  
 The ftcm of this plant in its fubftance rcfembled a flirub :  it appeared green,  but was deftitute of  leaves.  The corol ho defcribes as while,  except the  
 pan furrounding the fruit,  which was  fomewhat red  (rougeâtre),  and  alfo fome few longitudinal ftrcaks of  a  chefnut  colour.  Having noticed  the  
 expanded petals and filaments correfponding with them,  he proceeds to the feed velTels,  which obferve rather a diminilhcd proportion as they approach  
 the fummit.  They arc nearly round,  and on the upper pan rather flat.  Their colour inclines to a green,  with  a mixture of yellowiflj  red.  In  the  
 centre, is a hcart-fhapcd cavity,  containing Cx  feeds. 
 This fingular defcription excited my euriofity,  as well as fufpicion with  refpefl  to the real exiftence  of fuch a plant in  the  ocean ;  and  induced  
 me  to embrace the opportunity of  examining the figure of Marfigli,  in  the prcfence  of  the prefent  learned  Regius  Profeftbr of Botany  in  Oxford.  
 At the very firft fight,  there remained not the fmalleft  doubt  of iw being an Asphodklus.  And ihcProfciTor inftantly recognifcd the Afphodeliis  
 ramûfus,  which he himfelf had  long fince remarked,  ai one of  the moft  common of  the littoral plants on the coafts of Italy,  and  of  the  fmallcr  
 ¡Hands in the  South  of Europe. 
 10  Should not the itmunifixual feem an arbitrary and ufelcfsdiltinflion ?  It is ufcd by Adanfon, toexprcfs a fimple and fcif-eflîcient power in the  
 fnifliferous parts of  fomc vegetables,  and here applied  to a particular divifion of the fucufes,  in  comradiftinflion to others named  afexual,  as  being  
 fuppofed totally deftitute of  feeds,  and only fubjcil to a proliferous mode  of  increafe. 
 u   “ In omnibus veri notninisFuels,  folahabcmur organafeminca,  intraffondium corticcm abfcondita3  Mafculorum  autem  nullujn  adcft  vefti-  
 gium,  &c,”  Gett.  dc  Fruft.  p.  32. 
 [ 7 3 
 It may be neceffary briefly to notice  the  definitions,  which Gairtner”  has given o f vegetable propagation, 
   in order more  clearly  to  underftand that  part  of his  theory,  which  is  applied to the  extenfive  
 genus  of confervas.  H e   confiders  the fource o f vegetation,  as  dependent  on  a  two-fold  principle.  
 One of thefe,  by  virtue  of  an  inherent vital  force,  operates without any impregnation,  in  producing  
 a diftinft  and perfeft  epitome  of the  mature plant,  fimply  from  the medullary fubftance.  The other,  
 by an operation o f the organized  parts,  digefts  and  feparates proper  fccretions  from  the general mafs,  
 till  at  length by a more  complex  procefs,  an entire new organized body  is produced,  and the exa£l ru ..  
 diments  o f plants  are  formed  in  diftin8; and appropriate  parts.  This,  is  termed  fru£tification,  as  
 producing  feeds ;  the  former,  is  confidered  as  a  fimple  proliferous mode o f increafe.  The  author  
 then applies thefe  principles,  to the  different  parts  o f the  cryptogamous  clafs. 
 'All  the  confervas,  whether  capillary  or  beaded  (moniliformes),  he maintains,  are  entirely  dcfli-  
 tute  of feeds,  and  have  not  even  the  fiiadow  of  affinity  to  the  fexual  fyftem.  The moniliform  or  
 beaded  confervas,  e.  g.  C.  corallinoides  and  others,  throw out from their greater joints,  fmall  lateral  
 filaments of the  fame  form  and  ftrufture;  which conftitute  the only fource  of propagation,  by  a  pro-  
 cefs  very  fimple  in  itfelf;  as  one or  fometimes  two  of thefe joints  (articuli),  are by  the  mere intumef-  
 cence o f their  internal  fubftance,  converted  into a fingle globule;  which  after  it  hath  feparated  from  
 the original  ftock,  immediately  adheres  to  the  rock or body  on which it happens to light,  and  from  
 the upper part extends  itfelf into  a  new joint;  til! at  length  it  grows  up,  into  the  exad form and fimi-  
 litude  o f the  proliferous  parent  plant. 
 Thefe globules,  Gzertner obferves,  have  a  very  ftrong refemblance  to  the  fruftified  parts o f plants,  
 in their  texture as well as  in  their  form and  colour:  yet upon examination,  he  affirms,  they  will  be  
 found  to  be  fimple gems,  confifting  o f  mere  medullary  fubftance,  contained  in  a  homogeneous  
 bark or  covering;  from which  circumftance,  as  well  as  from  the  confluence  o f  thofe  joints  into  a  
 globule,  our author maintains  that  they  do  not  depend upon  any  other principle,  than  the  iiraple  faculty  
 o f vegetation,  for their mode o f  increafe.”’ 
 IS  This author has litely publiflicd a valuable work,  in  which  he has not only eftabliihed permanent diagnoftics of a great part of the known genera  
 of plants,  from  their  Fruits  and  Seeds ;  but  ha«,  with the united efforts of itivcftigationand fcicncc,  at once exemplified the principal fcope  
 of  former  writers,  with  refpcil 10  the  anatomy,  texture,  ufe,  and  ccconomy of thofe myfterious pans of plants,  wliich more immediately relate to  
 the propagation of vegetable life.  Sometimes,  however,  he appears  to  adopt ufclcfs diftinflions;  for  inftance,  he  feparates  the  Fucus plumofus,  
 F.  cartilagincus and  others under a genus named  ceramium,  as,  in his opinion,  not producing feeds,  but only geww,  by a  proliferous mode  of  in-  
 crcafe.  Girt,  de Fruil.  Iniroducft.  p.  jg. 
 '   Girt,  de  Fruft.  p.  i6. 
 13  Although GierinerafTcris,  that  the confervas,  as well as all  thofe fucufes,  which arc membranaceous  (complanati)  are fubjeff only to a proliferous  
 mode  of  increafe:  yet we have the cleareft  proofs,  that many of the latter derive their propagation from  feeds,  in every rcfpcft as unequivocally  
 as thofe  fucufes,  which  haVe been deemed more pcrfedl.  The Fucus  rubens,  i. c.  crenatus of Gmelin,  is  truly membranaceous,  very thin in  
 itstexlurc,  and nearly  tranfpircnt.  The central nerve,  which pervades the frons,  frequently branches off in oppofitc directions,  producing mtmcrous  
 leaves,  which at firft fight,  may appear a«  the dcciduous'offsprings of the proliferous parent ftock.  The margins of thefe leaves are oftentimes clofe-  
 ly  fringed with  minute fpines;  each  of which in time  becomes a kind of capfulc,  containing many  feeds of a faint purple colour.  Not one of thefe  
 feeds,  when magnified,  appears much larger than a particle of fand. 
 Tlie Fucus crifpaius of Hudfon,  although as delicate in its texture as  the fincft ulva,  contains  within  its  fegmcnts minute  innate  vcficlcs,  which  
 abound  with  a  remarkable  quftntity of grains or  feeds,  in every  rcfpcft very fimilar to  thofe,  which are obferved in  the pcrfedl plants of this genus.  
 Several other membranaceous  fucufes,  which have been  (in the Syft. Nat.)  lately feparated from the reft,  as being fuppofed  fubjeil only 10  a proliferous  
 increafe i  leave us no reafon to imagine that they are deftitute of  feeds.  Even Gmelin,  who  (in Hill. Furor.)  fecms firft to have cftablifiicd that  
 divifion,  defcribes a plant of this order,  the margins of which were furrounded with opaque globules:  and without being  prejudiced  in  favour  of  his  
 former opinion,  candidly endeavours to account for the caufe of this appearance,  by  attributing it in fomc degree to a ftate of maturcfcencc; f  which according  
 to the more ordinary courfe of Nature,  had producedthoferepoCtoriesforfceds, on which the propagation of the fpecies might probably depend.  
 %  flift/ Fucor.  p.  175.  Noia.  a«* 
 Some