4. maderensis, Sharpe, (p. 175.)
(Hartert, t. c. p. 128.)
[Cf. Koenig, J. f. O. 1890, p. 270, Taf. vi. fig. 1.
Ogilvie-Grant, Ibis, 1891, p. 441.]
Madeira.
5. moreleti, Pucker, (p. 176.)
(Hartert, t. c. p. 128.)
Azores, generally.
6. canariensis, Vieill. (p. 177.)
(Hartert, t. c. p. 129.)
[Fig., Koenig, J. f. O. 1890, Taf. vi. figs. 1, 2.]
Canary Is.
(Gran Canarià.
Gomera).
7. pa lmas, Tristr., Ann. & Mag. N. H. (6) iii. p. 489; Canary Is.
id. Ibis, 1890, pi. iii. (Hierro. Palma).
ccerulescens, Koenig, J . f. 0 . 1889, p. 183; 1890,
p. 479, Taf. vii.
(Hartert, t. c. p. 129.)
8. spodiogenys, Bp. (p. 177.)
(Hartert, t. c. p. 127.)
N.W. Africa
(Tunis).
Italy (acc.).
9. africana, Levaül. (p. 177, pt.)
(Hartert, t. c. p. 127.)
N.W. Africa
(Algeria).
10. koenigi, Rothsch. $ Hartert, Orn. MB. 1893, Marocco,
p. 97 ; Hartert, Yog. Pal. Fauna, i.
p. 128.
11. montifringilla, Linn. (p. 178.) N. Europe &
(Hartert, t. c. p. 130.) _ N. Asia to Japan.
S. in winter to
S. Europe, N. India,
& China.
Philippine Is.
XXXVI. PR.0CA&DUELIS, Hodgson.
(Sharpe, Cat. B. Brit. Mus. xii. p. 183, 1888.
Oates, Faun. Brit. Ind., Birds, ii. p. 223, 1890.
Hartert, Vog. Pal. Fauna, i. p. I l l , 1904.)
1. nipalensis {Rodgs.). (p. 182.) Himalaya Mts.
(Oates, t. c. p. 223 ; Hartert, t. c. p. 112.) (Kashmir to Bhutan).
W. China
(Kansu. Moupin).
2. rubescens, Blanf. (p. 184.) E. Himalayas
(Oates, t. c. p. 224 ; Hartert, t. c. p. 112.) (Nepal to Sikhitn).
W. China
(Kansu).
XXXVII. CARDUELIS, Briss.
(Sharpe, Cat. B. Brit. Mus. xii. p. 185, 1888 ;
Oates, Faun. Brit. Ind., Birds, ii. p. 225, 1890 ;
Bidgway, Birds N. & M. Amer. i. p. 93, 1903.)
[Acanthis, Bechst.; cf. Sclater, Ibis, 1892, p. 555;
Hartert, Vog. Pal. Fauna, i. p. 65 (1904)*.]
1. c a rd u e lis (Linn.), (p. 185.) Europe, from
(Bidgway, t. c. p. 94 ; Hartert, t. c. p. 67.) Central Sweden
to Mediterranean
Countries.
2. britannica, Hartert, t. c. p. 69. British Islands.
* Dr. Hartert has united all the Goldfinches, Siskins, Kedpolls, and Linnets under
one genus, Acanthis. He may be right, for I remember that I experienced great
difficulty in 1888, in finding characters for the definition of the genera I then
adopted. My impression is that when the osteology of the Finches is better
understood, we shall find good characters for many genera now obscure..
®2