
 
        
         
		has  been since,  proclaimed  byCuvier«and  Savigny  the  true  Ibis,  
 in, place  of the  Tantalus  Ibis of Linné, which he  so called for Want  
 of  knowing  the  real- Ibis,  believing  this* to be it, though but very  
 seldbm  even found  in  Egypt.  This  opinion, which though more  
 plausible  than  that  which  it'  superseded,  was  still  erroneous,  
 originated  with  Perrault,  and  was  adopted  and  maintained  by  
 Buffon,*risson, Linné,  Blumenbach,  and  all  others-until  lately,  
 when Colonel  Grobert returning  from Egypt presented  Fourcroy  
 with  mummiés  which  enabled  Cuvier  first  to  perceive  that  the  
 Ibis, Was  not  a  Tantalus,  but  a  true  Ibis, which  genus  he  did not  
 then distinguish from Numerous.  Savigny in the year  18Q6hy*hri  
 admirable work on the  Ibis, put the question a t rest.  . 
 The sacred White  Ibis, jgbough  not in reality peculiar to Egypt,  
 where  it  is  seen  only  at  certain  seasons, of  the  year,  does-napt-  
 however migrate to far distant countries :  it is  spread  throughout  
 Africa* and species  extremely similar to  it are fcpnd in India  and  
 Seylom*  Butait  is  noti 6 gK |o y in c e   to  treat  of’ it,  ahd  it  has  
 already  fomip. the subjec^p^feveral volumes. 
 .  We  have  already  reinarljged  that  Buffon  justly * indicated  the  
 natural  relations  of  the  Ibis  by  stating  that  it w w  intermediate  
 between the ^tork  and  the Curlew.  What he  said of the  speciesl  
 we  shall  extend  to   the' three  families  to,, which  the  three  birdaj  
 belong  in  our  system.  In  the  transition  from  onê* group  toj  
 another  Nature  seems  often  to- make  the  passage -by insensible’  
 intermediate ; steps,  and  it  sometimes  happens  that  the  species  
 placed  on  the  limits,  of  two  groups .belong  decidedly to  one  or  
 the  other,  and  even  when  it  may  he  impossible  to  Say, to  which  
 they ought to  be referred, we  still  cannot  admit them .as  types  of  
 an  intermediate  group.  At other times the  intermediate species  
 form  a small  group by themselves, and  although  a. portion of such  
 a conneeting  group* shows  great  affinity to  that which  follows  it,  
 whipe another portion is equally ebspiected with a preceding group, 
 yet th® two  parts  are  stilLmore  related ^between  themselves.  So  
 o it is with th&fsm^^MTantalidæ of Falmii,{ovmed from the genus  
 Tantalus of? Linné,-’ aaid  composed* ©if  but twepvery natural genera,  
 Tantalus  and  Ibis, the  former of which'-retains  a> resemblance  t'o  
 the  Jlrdeidæ  or.  Cultrivostres,  while«  the'* latte®' 'claims  a "stronger  
 affinity with the* Ècohpacidæ or Aimieôlæ. |  Nothing, in our-opinion,  
 shows  more- thci -propFiefy  and  even necessity • of  distinguishing  
 this small i nter-mediafe.group fromi*hos!e||vhidhttonchl-jupdb i t.<  '1  
 Buffon  and  Bris^ôüf,f'who'* used J?as  a  charaStér  Èhe artifiefalt  eMe  
 oUSb* curved  bill,  . not 
 Curlews, which  are  ifeaiL  Scölopaeidk^Mough  llipi^what  allied  to  
 Ibis.  LinnJ^whose  philosbphioal^ïacWas-' sêlà^în: at  faultj^nd  
 who  crowded  all  the  Scohpdcidæ  int^hist arbitrary  gen'era^^hoa  
 and  Scolopax,- dldynot  however  confound  the-.two  families^för -fee  
 employed  as  a  distinguishing  malrk  o f hi^geüus ;Wantqlus'  the  
 important  character  of  the  nakedjace.-  He  was IfeJlowedT'hy  
 Latham and  others.  The  Ibis, of ’*3fN|?épèdedis  equivalent  to'the  
 Tdntalus of  Linné,  though by givij^plie  gemi^'tybufame,- |#hi'ch  
 Latham had done  in English*,) he ohÿaawndttfee'obEeèit-of being the  
 founder  of  the  genus  Ibis,  but'  unjustly,  a® he-mcltfded^in’falill  
 the  smpoth  and  thick-billed  TantkK.  belongs  the 
 merit  of  having  first  ma.de  the  diminution  between" them,  htti  
 Cuvier, Vieillot,  Temminck,  and  most  others^  have  followed  his  
 eburse,  though  sème  German  authors,  call*' the lehtrieted?  genus  
 Falcinellus.  The  present  family  wa^nstiiuted  by  Illig ^  -tifnder  
 the name  of Falcati:  '■ Vieillot and  Ram-zanr adopted  ittender* the  
 name  of  Falcirestres.  Boie  called-  «   «of  the  Ibides,” -but  Guvifer  
 and Latreille plapecbthe two genera of Whieh it.ds-c’ömposed 'vvithin  
 the respective  limits  of  the  two-^milies-wbich they conne’et}!* and  
 which  they/called  Cultrimtres  and  Aongfrostres.  Although  Mr.  
 Vigors  and  the  modern  English  school  haVe  not  adopteÉ  it,  
 ^probably  because  it  interfered  /wlfh  their  whimsical  quinary 
 VOL.  iv »——i-  ,<