
 
		STRIX  CANDIDA,  Tickell. 
 Grass-Owl. 
 Strix Candida,  Tickeil, in Joum.  Asiat.  Soc.  Beng.,  vol.  ii.  p.  572.— Jerd.  
 India, vol. i. p.  118. 
 ----- longimembris, Jerd. in Madras Joum.  of  Lit. and  Sei., vol. x.  p. 86. 
 Scelostrix Candida, Blyth in Ibis,  1866, p.  251. 
 Strix Walleri,  Diggles, Orn. of Aust., part 7. pi.  1. 
 . Ind. Orn., pi. 
 mmw 
 I am  indebted to Mr. Waller,  of Brisbane,  for the loan  of a specimen  of this  fine Owl,  which  lias lately  been  
 added  to  the  list  of  the  Queensland  fauna;  and  I  very much  regret  that  the  specific  name  of  Walleri,  
 assigned  to it by Mr. Diggles,  cannot be  retained, hut must sink  into  the  rank  of a synonym, the bird having  
 long  previously  been  described  by Tickell  as  Strix  Candida,  and  by  Jerdon  as  Strix longimembris.  I make  
 this  affirmation  after a careful comparison  of two fine Indiau examples with  the specimen sent by Mr. Waller  
 from  Queensland,  through  Charles  Coxen, Esq.,  in  the  course of  which I found  uo  sufficient difference  to  
 warrant my regarding  them  as  distinct.  In  size, markings,  and,  indeed,  in every particular  the Indian  and  
 Australian  examples  are  closely alike.  When we  remember that the bird  is  strictly a grass-frequenter,  and  
 that  the grassy plains  of  India  and  Australia  are  of a very similar  character,  we  need  not feel  surprised at  
 its  being found  in  both  countries,  although  they are so wide  apart.  It  is  now  clearly established  that  the  
 White  Herons  or Egrets,  and  many  of  the  Plovers  and  Sandpipers,  of  the  two  countries  are specifically  
 identical;  and their  avifaunas  may  be  regarded  as  still  more  closely  united  by the  discovery that  this  fine  
 Owl  ranges  from  the base  of  the Himalayas  (through,  perhaps,  the intervening countries  of  Java and  the  
 Philippines,  as suggested to me  by Mr. Blyth)  to Australia. 
 As  I  have  no  information  of  my own  to  offer  respecting  this  bird,  I  take  the  liberty of  transcribing  
 Mr. Digglesls  account of it from his work above quoted, which  comprises all  that is  known of it in Australia. 
 It does  not  often  happen  in  a  country  so  well  searched  since  the  visit  of Mr. Gould in  the years  1838,  
 1839,  1840,  that  so  important and  interesting  a  bird  is  brought  to  lig h t;  and  the fact  of  its  having  been  
 shot in  the  immediate  neighbourhood  of Brisbane may  serve to encourage  others  interested  in  the study of  
 ornithology, more  especially  in  the  newly settled districts where  novelties  are  mostly to  be  looked  for,  to  
 endeavour to add  to our knowledge  of the fauna of their adopted  country. 
 “ The  habits  of  this bird  doubtless  assimilate  in  every important respect  to  those of  the  other members  
 of  the  family.  Its nearest  ally is  Strix delicatula,  a  much  smaller  species, which,  like  the  present, has the  
 tarsi naked for about half  their length,  the remainder  of the Australian Owls yet known  being  feathered  to  
 the  toes.” 
 The following is Mr. Diggles’s description of this  bird, which, as  it was probably taken  from  a  recent specimen, 
  I give  in  preference  to one of my own :— 
 “ Crown,  back,  and  upper  tail-coverts  blackish  brown,  intermingled with  tawny buff,  each  feather with  a  
 small white  spot’at  the  tip ;  facial  disk  huffy white,  with  a  patch  of  blackish  brown  in front  of  the eye;  
 fringe around  the  disk bright buff  the  shaft  of  each  feather marked  with  black;  wings  blackish  brown,  intermingled  
 with  bright  tawny of  a deeper tint  than  that of the back,  and  with  a spot  of  white at the tip  of  
 each feather;  from  the  shoulder  to  the  body a  broad  space  of bright tawny  buff  speckled  with  numerous  
 small  black  spots ;  primaries  and  secondaries  bright  tawny  huff  tipped  for  a considerable portion  of  their  
 length with  brownish ;  the larger  portion  of  their inner  webs pure white,  the  former are barred with  four,  
 and  the latter  with  three bands  of  blackish  brown ;  scapularies  blackish  brown, with  a spot  of white  at the  
 tip  of each  feather;  central  tail-feathers beautiful  bright  buff,  with  four  black  bands;  the  nearest  of  the  
 lateral feathers  partake of  the  same  colour;  but the outer ones  are much  paler,  being nearly white,  and the  
 bands  almost obsolete ;  sides of the neck,  chest,  and upper portion of the abdomen  buff  becoming gradually  
 paler towards  the ta il;  the whole  of  the  undersurface marked with small  brown  spots near the  tip  of  each  
 feather;  thighs  huff  externally,  and  white  internally;  underside  of  the  wings  white,  slightly  mixed  with  
 buff  and marked with  arrowhead-shaped spots  of blackish  brown  ;  undersurface  of the quills white,  banded  
 ’  H  dark  brown;  tarsi  long,  rather slender,  and  feathered  for  about half their length,  the  reclothed  
 with  short  hairs;  legs  and  feet  yellowish  flesh-colour;  bill  flesh-colour; 
 and  tipped  
 maining  portion  beii  
 irides  dark  brown. 
 “ The female  is  not  so  brigh  
 The  filriire is  of the natural i 
 i  colour,  but in other respects  is  very similar to  the  male. 
 I T O Iw M l i a l K H