
 
        
         
		MENURA  ALBERTI,  Gould. 
 Albert  Lyre  Bird. 
 Menurà Alberti, Gould  in  Proc.  of Linn. Soe., February 5, 1850— Bonap. Consp. Gen. Av., p. 215—Jard. Cont.  
 Orn.,  1850. 
 T he  dense, luxuriant, and  almost impenetrable  brushes which  skirt along the eastern coast of Australia from  
 Sydney  to Moreton Bay,  are,  as  might  be supposed,  tenanted  by many forms  both  of mammalia  and  birds  
 peculiarly their  own;  many of  these  districts are very  partially known,  and  some  of  them  may be  said  to  
 be  as yet untrodden,  hence it is not surprising  that an  additional  species  of  this  extraordinary form  should  
 have been  there discovered.  I must fairly admit, however,  that I was not prepared for  the acquisition  of so  
 remarkable  a bird within  the limits  of the  colony  of New South Wales. 
 I  have great  pleasure  in  naming  this  species M. Alberti, in  honour of His Royal Highness Prince Albert,  
 as a slight token  of  respect for  his  personal virtues,  and  the liberal support  he has rendered to my various  
 publications. 
 The  specific  differences  between  the  present  bird  and  the  older  known  species, M.  superba,  are  very  
 apparent;  they consist in the rufous colouring of the plumage, and in the total absence of the brown barrings  
 of the lyre-shaped tail-feathers, which,  moreover,  are much shorter than  the other feathers of the  tail, while  
 in M. superba they are  the longest;  they are “ composed,” says  Sir William Jardine, who has carefully compared  
 the  specimens  of  the  two  species  in  my possession,  “ of very broad webs,  loose but  not separated.  
 The next  six feathers  on  each  side are  similar  in  structure,  having wide  separated  barbs,  but  they are finer  
 and  shorter  than in M. superba.  The two centre feathers are also of the same structure, and  cross each other  
 at the  base;  but the  inner webs are  broader, the outer rudimentary barbs stronger and placed more thickly;  
 the entire  tail  considerably shorter.” 
 The  first  specimens  of  this  bird  that  came  under  my  notice  were  sent  to  me  by  Mr.  Strange  of  
 Sydney;  my  friend  Dr.  Bennett  also  forwarded  to  me  almost  simultaneously  a  fine  example  belonging  
 to  the Museum,  which  the Directors with  their wonted liberality,  had at his request permitted to be sent to  
 England for  illustration  in  the present work. 
 “ I have  often  seen  this  new species  of Menura,"  says Dr. Bennett,  “ but always regarded it as  a  young  
 male  of M.  superba,  until Dr.  Stephenson  residing at York Station.  Richmond River,  (who accompanied Sir  
 Thomas  Mitchell  on  his  last  expedition,)  informed me that he believed it  to be new, which on comparison  
 I found  to  be  the  case.  I  cannot,  perhaps,  do  better  than  send  you  the  following  extract  from  Dr.  
 Stephenson’s  letter,  dated  Sept.  20,  1 8 4 9 : - “ In  a  collection  of  birds  made  in  the  year  1849  on  the  
 specimens  of a nondescript Menura,  one of which I present to  you for examination  and  
 Fill  perceive  a very close affinity between it and the superba,  except  in  the  tail, which is  
 ce  the idea of its being  distinct occurred to me and to my friend Augustus A. Leycester,  
 ■very possible  inquiry respecting  the  bird  amongst  the sawyers  and  others,  all of  whom 
 Richmond,  are  tw  
 description.  You  
 very different.  Si  
 Esq.,  I hâve made 
 agree  that it is  distinct';  some  of  them  had  shot specimens of  the M.  superba at  Camden  Haven  and other  
 localities to the  southward,  but had  never  seen  the  present  bird  further to  the south  than  the  Nambucca  
 River;  they also  state  that  the  new bird is  not so timid as the old one,  and  is consequently more easily shot  
 The locality  it frequents  consists of mountain  ridges  not very densely covered wit l  rus  ,  i  P f mos  
 its time on  the ground, feeding  and  strutting about with  the tail  reflected  over  the back  to w thin  an  
 two  of  the head,  and with  the wings  dropping  on  the  ground.  Each  bir  orms  o n  s<-  
 .  ,  .  ,  ,  ,  u H M .  ,|,,,V in s is t  of holes scratched m  the ‘ conobonng places,’ as thqsawyers  call then,;  they cons g  ol  o  H s| a ndy grQoru nfodu  ar bhonuntd trwedo 
 feet  and  a half in  diameter by sixteen,  eighteen  or twenty inches in deptn, 
 yards  apart or  even more.  Whenever you  get sight of  the bird, which  can  only  be done with  the  
 caution  and  by taking  advantage of intervening objects to shelter yourself from  its | g M   
 it in  one  or other ofthese holes, into which  it frequently jumps and seems to be feci  ng.  then  asceuds  ag  
 and  struts round and round the place, imitating with its powerful musical voice any bird  
 around  i t ;  the  note  of the Dacelo gigantea it imitates  “  ^ rf“ »10" ’  j‘S  he nearest tree>  first  alighting on 
 instantly darts  off  to  another  of  its  play-ground:  
 insects, with  scarcely a trace  of any  other material.” 
 Mr.  Strange  informs me  that he met  with  the  bird  g in  th 
 inch  or  
 or  four 
 reatest  
 ill  find 
 : to hear 
 vn whistle  is exceedingly beautiful 
 The stomachs of  those I  dissected i variably contai: 
 edar  brushes  which  skirt Turanga  Creek,