
 
        
         
		CASUAIKIITS  AIJSTKALIS  .  W all/ 
 CASUARIUS  AUSTRALIS,  Wail. 
 Australian  Cassowary. 
 Casuarius  australis, Wall,  Illustrated Sydney  Herald,  June  3,  1854.—Gould, in  Proc.  of  Zool.  Soc.,  part  xxv. 
 1857, p.  270.—Sclat. in Proc. Zool. Soc., partxxviii. 1860, p.  210, and 1866, pp. 168, 557.—Benn.  ibid.,  
 1867, p. 473.—Sclat. ibid.,  1868, p  376.—Gould, Handb.  Birds of Australia, vol.  ii. p.  206. 
 ---- Johnsonii,  Muell.  in  the  Australasian,  Dec.  15,  1866;  Melbourne Herald, Dec.  17,  1867;  and Proc. 
 of Zool. Soc.,  1867, p. 242.—Krefft, ibid.,  1867, p. 483.-^Digg. Orn. of Aust., part xiii. pi.  5. 
 T he  discovery of a  species  of  Cassowary  in  Australia may  be  looked  upon  as  one  of  the  most  interesting  
 results of the later explorations  of that vast portion  of the globe;  interesting indeed  is  the acquisition  of the  
 truly noble  bird represented in the accompanying Plate, since it is  one of the few remaining species  of a great  
 group  of wiugless  birds  which  formerly  tenanted  the  austral  regions  of  our  planet.  For  our  first  knowledge  
 of  its existence we  are  indebted  to  the  late Mr. Thomas Wall, who,  like Gilbert,  Strange, Leichardt,  
 Johnson, Drummond, Burke,  and Wills,  and many  other explorers,  left  his  bones  in  the  inhospitable wilds  
 of Australia.  It  was  communicated  to  the world  in  nearly the following words :—“ A specimen  of this  bird  
 was shot near Cape York, in one of the almost  inaccessible gullies which abound  in  that  part of the Australian  
 continent,  and where, as well  as in  other deep and  stony valleys  of that neighbourhood,  it was runnino-in companies  
 of seven or eight.  On that part of the north-eastern  coast, therefore, it is probably plentiful, and will be  
 met with  in  all  the  deep  gullies  at  the base of high  hills.  The  bird  possesses great strength  in  its  legs,  and  
 makes  use  of it  in  the  same manner as  the  Emu.  Its whole  build  is more strong and heavy than  the  latter  
 bird.  It  is  very wary;  but its presence  may  be  detected  by  its  utterance  of a  peculiarly loud  note,  which  is  
 taken  up and  echoed  along  the  gullies ;  and  it  could  be  easily killed with  a rifle.”  These particulars  were  
 published  in  the  ‘ Illustrated  Sydney Herald/  of  the  3rd  of  June,  1854,  by Mr. Thomas Wall’s  brother,  
 Mr. William  Sheridan Wall,  Curator  of the  Australian Museum,  who  at  the  same  time  suggested  for  the  
 bird  the specific  name  of  australis,  a  term  which  has  been  adopted  by every  European  ornithologist.  In  a  
 note from Dr.  Bennett, that gentleman says H si‘ Carron,  the survivor of Kennedy’s Expedition,  informed me  
 that  the Cassowary shot  by Wall  had  a  helmet or  crest  on  the  head of  a  black  colour,  and  not  red  as  first  
 stated,  and  that  two  specimens  were  shot  and  eaten  by his  party  in  the dense scrubs  in Weymouth  Bay,  
 near Cape York,  and  close  to  the  coast.” 
 The  next  notice  of  the  bird  is  contained  in  a  communication  to  the Zoological  Society  of  London,  on  
 the  13th  of December,  1866,  by Mr.  Sclater, who stated  that  he  had  been  informed  by Mr. Walter J . Scott,  
 who  had  an  extensive sheep-run  in  the  Valley  of Lagoons,  on  the  Upper Burdekin  River,  about  100  miles  
 westward  of Rockingham Bay,  that  in  the  neighbourhood  of the latter locality the bird was  well  known under  
 the  name of the Black Emu,  but was  shy and  very  difficult  to  obtain. 
 “ I fear  I  can  tell  you  but  little  respecting  these  birds,”  says Mr.  S co tt;  “ I  have  never  had  the  fortune  
 to meet with  one  myself,  but  have  received  information  of  their being seen  on  three or four  occasions,  in  
 spots  thirty or forty miles apart.  Some  black  troopers  of  the  native  police,  returning  from  an  unsuccessful  
 pursuit of  one they  had  seen  about  three mdes from  our Vale  of  Herbert  Station  (in  lat.  18° S.),  who were  
 perfectly familiar with  the Common Emu, informed me  that the  bird  they had  seen  was  quite  distinct from it.  
 The  Superintendent  of the  same station  told  me,  on  a former  occasion,  he  had  seen  two Black Emus,  but  
 thought they were a mere  variety.  Another person  in  our  employment saw one on  the  ‘  Separation  Creek ’  
 of Leichardt, which  is  really  a  tributary  of the Herbert  River.” 
 Two  days  later,  December  15th,  1866,  the  following  communication  from Dr. Mueller appeared  in  the  
 Melbourne newspaper,  ‘The Australasian’:— 
 “ For the  intelligence  of  the existence  of  an  Australian  true casoar,  and  for  the  means  of  defining  preliminarily  
 its  specific  characters,  I am  indebted  to G.  Randall Johnson, Esq.,  who  in  September  last,  while  
 on a visit  to Rockingham Bay,  shot  in  the Gowrie Creek  scrub  the  only specimen  of this  remarkable  bird,.as  
 yet  obtained,  and whose name I  wish  it should  b e a r;  and I  cannot  do  better than  to give  in  the first instance  
 publicity  to the  lucid  remarks  transmitted  to me  by  that  gentlemen” :— 
 “ ‘ The bird seems to confine itself almost entirely to the more open parts of the scrubs, and seldom ventures  
 far out  on  the  plains.  During  the  months  of  July, August,  and September  its  food consists  chiefly of  an  
 egg-shaped  blue-skinned  berry,  the  fruit  of ,a  large  tree.  This,  together with  herbage,  probably forms  its  
 diet,  at least for  that  portion  of  the year;  but at present its  habits  have  been so  little  observed  that  hardly  
 anything  is  known  concerning  them.’ ” 
 At  the meeting  of the  Zoological Society of London,  on  the 28th  of February,  1867, Mr. Sclater, referring