
 
        
         
		IRENA  PUELLA. 
 Indian  Fairy  Bluebird. 
 Fairy Roller,  Latham,  Gen.  Synopsis, Suppl.  p.  87. 
 Coracias puella, Lath.  Ind. Ora.  p.  171.—Daudin, Traité,  ii.  p.  264. 
 Irena puella, Jerdon, Madras  Journal, xiii.  p.  262.— Me Clell.  Proe.  Zoo'l. Soc.  1839,  p.  160.—Gray, Gen.  Birds,  
 i. p.  288, pi.  70.  fig.  3 (l847||§-Horsf. &  Moore, Cat.  of  Birds  Mus.  E.I.  Co.  p.  273  (1854).— Jerdon, 
 B.  India,  ii.  p.  105  (1863).—Gray,  Hand-1.  Birds,  i.  p.  288  (1869).—Stoliezka,  Joum. As. Soc. Beng.  
 xxxix.  pt.  2,  p.  318 (1870).—Wald.  Ibis,  1871,  p.  170.—Holdsw.  Proc.  Zool.  Soc.  1872,  p. 452.—  
 Wald.  Ibis,  1873, p.  306.—Armstrong, Stray  Feathers,  1876, p.  326.—Sharpe,  Cat.  Birds  Brit.  Mus.  
 iii.  p.  268  (1877).—Fairbank,  Str.  F.  1877,  p.  406.— Hume & Davison,  Stray Feathers,  1878, pp.  328,  
 516.— Hume,  Str.  F.  1879,  p.  99;—Legge,  Birds  o f Ceylon,  p. 466  (1880).—Sharpe,  Cat.  Birds  Brit.  
 Mus.  vi. p.  177  (1881). 
 Irena Mica, A . Hay, in Blyth’s Report, Journ. As.  Soc.  Beng.  xv. p. 309  (1846).—Bonap. Consp.  i. p. 349  (1850). 
 T h is   is  the  best-known  o f all  the Fairy Bluebirds;  and,  in  giving several  illustrations of the  different species  
 o f  the  genus Irena,  I have been  desirous  o f  illustrating one  o f  the  most  interesting  and peculiar forms  of  
 Asiatic bird-life.  The  systematic  position  o f  the  genus Irena has  been  one  that  has  puzzled  a good many  
 naturalists;  and  it  has  been  variously placed  in  the  families  Dicruridae  and  Brachypodidae.  Mr.  Bowdler  
 Sharpe  placed  the  genus  among  the  Dicruridae  in  the  third  volume  of  the  ‘ Catalogue  of  B ird s;’  but,  
 recognizing  his  mistake,  he  has  lately,  in  his  sixth  volume,  republished  the  descriptions,  and  classified  the  
 genus  with  the  Bulbuls.  To  this  conclusion  he  was  led  by the  arguments  used  by the  late  Marquis  of  
 Tweeddale,  in  his  critique  on  the  third  volume  of  the  ‘-Catalogue  o f  Bird s;’  and I do not  think I can  do  
 better than  reproduce some  of the observations made  by  his Lordship  on  that occasion. 
 “ Irena.  The  true  systematic  position  of  this  genus  has divided the opinions o f  ornithologists  ever since  
 Horsfield founded it.  Temminck  first classed it among the Dicruridae;  and so have  other authors since, and  
 Mr. Sharpe does the  same.  Jerdon  placed  it  (following Blyth) among the short-legged Thrushes, and made  
 i t   constitute  a  separate subfamily,  Ireninae,  the  third  among  the  Brachypodidae,  arranging  it  between  the  
 Phyllornithinas and  the Oriolinae.  In  Jerdon’s  view I must’ undoubtedly concur.  The  affinity  between Irena  
 and Dicrurus is more  apparent than re a l;  it is  an affinity  of mimicry a t best.  The contour of  the  bill  has a  
 superficial  resemblance;  but  the  margins  of  the  commissure  are  inflected  in Irena;  in Dicrurus  they  are  
 spreading.  In the last the rictal bristles are developed (a  certain indication o f insectivorous  hab its);  in Irena  
 they are short, weak,  almost  absorbed.  In  the gradation  of  the quills  there is some analogy;  but in  Irena,  
 the  3rd, 4th, and  5th  are  usually  equal and longest, whereas  in  Dicrurus the 3rd  is  generally shorter than  the  
 4th and 5th.  Beyond  these  points all  resemblance ceases.  The  tarsus  and feet are short  and weak  in Irena;  
 the  toes  and  nails  are  singularly slender  for  the size  o f  the  body;  and  the  outer toe  is  free, whereas  in  
 Dicrurus  it  is  ankylosed up  to the  first joint.  The  tail  consists  o f  twelve  rectrices,  and  not  of  ten ;  and  
 this character of  itself  removes Irena from  the  Dicruridae,  according  to Mr.  Sharpe’s  own  definition.  The  
 plumage  is  of  a   totally  different  character.  The  skin  in  Irena  is  especially. ten d e r;  in  Dicrurus  it  is  
 exceedingly tough.  In Dicrurus  the  sexes wear  the  same  plumage,  even  the  ornate  plumes;  in Irena the  
 male  has  a brilliant  and  the  female a  sombre  attire.  Every species  of  Irena has  a number of  fine  nuchal  
 hairs,  which  are  wanting in Dicrurus.  This  last  character  (unknown  to  Blyth  and  Jerdon),  together with  
 the  short  and weak  feet,  indicates  a  great  affinity to  Criniger.  The Dicruri  are  insectivorous,  some  even  
 killing  small  birds,  whereas Irena is frugivorous.  The  structure  of  the  sternum  in Dicrurus is,  I believe,  
 different from  that  of  Irena.  The notes  of  Irena  are  those  of  Oriolus,  and  have  no  similarity to  those of  
 Dicrurus 
 The  Indian  Fairy  Bluebird  is  found  in  the  forests  of  Southern  India.  Jerdon  states  it  is  far  from  
 uncommon  in  the  lofty jungles  of Malabar,  and  he also met with  it  in  forests  near Palghautcherry, Trichoor,  
 the Wynaad,  and  on  the Coonoor  Ghat  as  high  as 4000 feet  and  upwards;  it is  also found  in  Travancore,  
 in  the  Neilgherri  Mountains,  and  the  Palani  Hills,  ranging  as  high  as  4000  feet  in  the  latter  locality  
 according to Dr.  Fairbank,  who also met with  it in  the Sawant-wade woods  in  the  Khandala district.  It  is  
 very rare  in  Ceylon, having only been  known  to occur in  that island  on  three occasions, twice  near Kandy, and  
 once  near Saffragam.  Although  it has  been said  to  have  been  met with  near Sehwan, in  Scinde, Mr.  Hume  
 has  pointed  out  that  it was  in  all probability a  caged specimen which  had  been  killed,  as  this locality is  so  
 far out  of  the  bird’s range  that  it  is  scarcely possible for  it  to  have  occurred  in  a wild  state.  I t is not  
 known from  any part  of  the  Himalayas  until  Sikkim  is  reached;  but  eastwards from  that country it  occurs