1807.
1812.
1817.
1818.
1820.
1828.
Terebella conchilega and cht'ysodon, Turton. Brit. Fauna, vol, i, p. 132.
„ „ . Gmelin. Syst. Nat., i, pt. vi, p. 3113.
Sabella „ Stewart. Elements, vol. ii, p. 423.
Terebella „ Lamarck. Anim. s. Vert., t. v, p. 363.
}) 3) Schweigger. Handb. Nat., p. 599.
„ „ Savigny. Syst. Annel., p. 85.
„ „ De Blainville. Diet. Sc. nat., t. lvii, p. 438, pi. iv, fig. 2.
AmphitHte Tondi, Delle Chiaje. Memorie, vol. iii, p. 180, Tav. xiv, fig. 2.
1836.
1841.
1843-«
1844.
1849.
1850.
1851.
1853.
1857.
1862.
1863.
1865.
1869.
1870.
1873.
1874.
1875.
1879.
1879.
1880.
1881.
1883.
1884.
„ flexuosa, idem. Ibid., pp. 169, 180, pi. xliii, fig. 5.
„ conchylega, Bose. Vers. (2nd Edit.), i, p. 195.
,y Cuvier. Beg. An., t. iii, p. 193.
Terebella conchilega., Templeton. Mag. Nat. Hist., ix, p. 233.
AmphitHte Tondi, Delle Chiaje. Descrizione, Tav. lxxx, fig. 2 (multilans).
„ flexuosa, idem. Descriz. e not., t. iii, p. 70. and t. v, p. 94, pi. cv, fig. 5.
-53. Terebella borealis, Chenu. Illust. Conch., IIe livr., pi. iii, fig. 1.
„ flexuosa, idem. Ibid., IIe livr., pi. v, fig. 5.
Terebella conchilega, Thompson. Fauna Irel., p. 272.
,f „ Milne Edwards. Règ. An., pi. v, fig. 1.
)} „ De Quatrefages. Ann. Sc. nat., 3e sér., t. xiv, p. 368, pi. x, fig. 4.
}} „ : Maitland. Fauna Belg., p. 205.
if „ Grube. Fam. Aiinel., pp. 80 and 138.
,, littoralis, seu arenaria, Dalyell. Pow. Créât., vol. ii, p. 183, pi. xxvi, figs. 1 7.
,, conchilega, Koren. Nyt Mag., ix, p. 94.
}> ^ ' Keferstein. Zeitsch. f. wiss. Zool., Bd. xii, p. 128.
,j artifex, Sars. Nyt Mag. Naturvid., xii, p. 310.
■ „ conchilega and littoralis, Johnston. Cat. Worms Brit. Mus., pp. 235“and 345.
Physelia Tondi, De Quatrefages. Annel., t. ii, p. 355, pi. xix, fig. 2.
Terebella prudens, idem. Ibid., p. 357.
„ pectoralis, idem. Ibid., p. 358.
Lanice conchilega, Malmgren. Nord. Hafs.-Annul., p. 380.
„ „ idem. Annul. Polych., p. 108, Tab. xiii, fig. 73.
Terebella „ Parfitt. Cat. Devon Annel., p. 31.
„ flexuosa, Claparède. Annél. Nap., p. 394, pi. xxxi, fig. 1.
• ,, (Lanice) conchilega, Grube. Mitt. St. Vaast, etc., p. 38.
„ conchilega, idem. Archiv für Naturges., 36 Jahr., p. 327.
„ flexuosa, Claparède. Annél. Sédent., pi. ix, figs. 1—15, pl. x, figs. 1—-5, pl. xi, fig. 12,
pp. 16, 36, 92, 95, 100,123, 128.
Lanice conchilega, Ehlers. Zeitsch. f. wiss. Zool., Bd. xxv, pl. i, fig. 201.
i} „ McIntosh. Ann. Nat. Hist., 4 ser., vol. xiv, p. 205.
Terebella flexuosa, Panceri. Atti Soc. Ital., vol. xviii, p. 530.
Lanice conchilega, McIntosh. Invert, and Fishes St. Andrews, p. 129.
Terebella artifex, Storm. Kongl. Norske Vid.-Selsk. Skrift. Trondhjem for 1878, p. 35.
,, . conchilega, Tauber. Annul. Danica, p. 131.
„ „ Cosmovici. Archiv Zool. Expér., t. viii, p. 288, pl. xxiv, figs. 1—9.
Lanice „ Langerhans. Zeitsch. f. wiss. Zool., Bd. xxxiv, p.106, pl. v, fig. 20.
,, „ Leslie and Herdman. Proc. Roy. Phys. Soc. Edin., vol. vi, p. 66.
„ ,, Levinsen. Vidensk. Meddels: Copenh., p. 175.
„ „ von Marenzeller. Sitzb. der K. K. Akad. der wiss. Wien, lxxxix,p. 1911,
sep. abd., p. 41.
1885. Lanice conchilega, Carus. Fauna Medit., i, p. 264.
1886. Terebella „ Harvey Gibson. Proc. Lit. and Philos. Soc. Liverp., vol. xl, p. 158.
1887. Lanice „ Cunningham. Quart. Journ. Micr. Sc., vol. xxviii, pp. 248, 264, 274,
pl. xviii, figs. 10—14.
„ „ Meyer. Mittli. Zool. Stat. Neap., Bd.vii,pp. 618—625,634, Taf.xxii, figs. 1,
4 and 5, pl. xxiii, fig. 3, pl. xxv, figs. 14 — 24, pl. xxvii, fig. 28.
1888., ,,- „ Cunningham and Ramage. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinb., vol. xxxiii, p. 664,
pl. xliii, fig. 26,
1890. Terebella littoralis, Arnold Watson. Journ. Roy. Micros. Soc., p. 685, pl. xiv, figs. 1—8.
,, Lanice (Terebella) conchilega, Malaquin. Annél. Boulon., p. 48.
1891. „ conchilega, Hornell. Trans. Biol. Soc. Liverp., vol. v, p. 257.
1893. ,> „ Lo Bianco. Annel. tubicola di Nap., p. 54.
„ ■' Terebella littoralis, Watson. Sheffield Lit. and Philos. Soc., p. 2.
1894. Lanice conchilega, Bidenkap. Christ. Vet.-Akad. Forhandl., p. 128.
)} De St. Joseph.. Aun. Sc. nat., 8e sér., t. xvii, p. 213, pl. ix, figs. 241—245.
1896. ' >, Orlandi. Atti Soc. Ligustica di Sc. Nat., vol. vii, pl 157.
1897. „ conchylega, Michaelsen. Polych. deutsch. Meere., p. 170.
1904. „ conchilega, Journ. M. B. A., vol. vii, p. 229.
1906. Terebella „ Bohn. Ann. Sc; nat., 9e sér., t. iii, pp. 122 and 124 (movements).
1907. Lanice conchylega, Ehlers. Abhandl. Konigl. Gesell. Wiss. Gottingen, Bd. v, p. 27.
1909. „ conchilega, Fauvel. Bull. Inst. Ocean., cxlii, p. 31.
j} )} Benham. Records Canterbur. Mus., vol. i, p. 10.
}) }J Fauvel. Ann. Sc. nat., 9e sér., t. x, p. 209.
1910. „ / „ Southern. Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., vol. xxviii, p. 237.
„ Elwes. Journ. M. B. A., vol. ix, p. 63.
1911. Terebella „ Riddell. Proc. Liverp. Biol. Assoc., vol. xxv, p. 63.
1912. Lanice conchylega, Meyer, A. H. Inaug. Dissert. Kiel, p. 40.
,, conchilega, Crawshay. Journ. M. B. A., vol. ix, p. 343.
Wollebæk. Skrift. Selsk. Krist,, Bd. ii, No. 18, p. 105, pl. xxxvi, figs. 1—8.
Giard. OEuvres Div., p. 57.
Southern. Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., vol. xxxi, No. 47, p. 123.
Fauvel. Campag. Scient. Monaco, xlvi, p. 302.
Allen. Journ. M. B. A., vol. x, p. 634.
McIntosh. Ann. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, vol. xv, p. 15.
Southern. Irish Sc. Invest., No. 3, p. 46.
Rioja. Anél. Poliq. Cantâb., p. 54.
Hessle. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala, p. 168.
1913.
1914.
1915. Terebella „
„ Lanice ,,
1917. „ '
Habitat.—Abundant pi many parts of the sandy shores of Britain, east, west, north
and south, the tubes being immersed in the sand near and beyond low-water mark, so that
in certain instances, when the tide is out, the surface is hispid with them. They are
accompanied by Amphidotus cordatm, Oeratisqlen legumrn (on the western shores of England,
as at Southport), by Arenkola marina and swarms of shrimps. Moreover, such regions are
characterised by multitudes of young flat fishes. Hence after storms, when the sand is
shifted, myriads of the tubes, generally empty, are occasionally tossed on shore, as at
St. Andrews, forming a soft coating several inches in depth for hundreds of yards alçng
the beach. They also occur in numbers under stones resting on sand near low watermark.
At Southport, where the tubes are common within tide-marks, the branched