Shaw’s Pheasant.
Phasimus shatvi, Elliot, P. Z. S. 1870, . p . 403.—Id. Monogr. Phasian. ii. pl. 1 (1872).—Scully, Str. F. 1875,
p. 433.
Phasiahus insignis, Elliot, P. Z. S. 1870, p. 404.—Id. Monogr. Phasian. ii. pi. 3 (1872).
Mr. R. B. Shaw, whose interesting work on High Tartary, Yarkand, &c. is doubtless known to my readers,
brought back from his expedition to the latter country three imperfect skins o f Pheasants, which, having
been submitted to Mr. Elliot, were pronounced by that gentleman to belong to two undescribed species ;
and these were accordingly named by him P . shawi and P . insignis respectively. For a highly instructive
dissertation on the origin of the different kinds of true Pheasant I must refer my readers to Mr. Elliot’s
‘ Monograph,’ and must confine myself heré to reproducing a very important article which has just appeared
in ‘ Stray Feathers ’ from the pen of Mr. J . Scully, who, I think, succeeds in showing that P . shawi and
P . insignis are referable to one and the same species
“ D uring my residence in Eastern Turkestan I had abundant' opportunities o f observing the Yarkand
Pheasant; I saw at least from thirty to forty of these birds alive, kept some in confinement for months, and
have lately been looking over a series of twenty-four skins—nine in my own collection, and fifteen belonging
to Mr. R. B. Shaw. While in Kâshgharia I often tried to make out whether there were two species of
Pheasants there ; but, as I was not aware of the precise grounds on which Mr. Elliot had separated the birds,
I could not very well decide ; my impression, however, was certainly in favour of one species only. I heard
that the distinction was supposed to be the extent to which the breast-feathers were edged with green ; but
as hardly two birds could be found exactly alike in the matter of this edging, I felt satisfied that the species
must have been founded on something much more definite and constant than that character.
“ On going over my specimens a few days ago with Mr. Hume, that gentleman expressed his opinion that
all my skins belonged to one species, although he pointed out that one of the birds had less green on the
chest than the others. I then examined Mr. Shaw’s collection, and found that ’ three of his birds
corresponded with the one noted by Mr. Hume ; and this determined me to look at Mr. Elliot’s work to see
what he had said about the matter.
“ The first point that struck me in regard to the plates of Phasianus insignis and P . shawi in Mr. Elliot’s
magnificent work was, that both the birds were erroneously represented as having conspicuous red lappets,
or wattles, which the Yarkand Pheasant certainly never has at any season ; the head should have been
represented like that of P . colchicus, with a bare crimson orbital skin always at a lower level than the
feathers of the cheek. The second piece of information I derived from the plate was that the bird having
the green of the neck sharply terminated a t the upper breast was the one called P . shawi, while the one
having the green reflections extending all down the chest was P . insignis. I tried to find out from the
text whether Mr. Elliot pointed out any distinction between his two species ; but as this was not obvious
on a first reading, I copied down his descriptions of the corresponding parts o f P . insignis and P . shawi in
opposite columns, underlined the discrepancies, and sat down to study the subject with my specimens
before me. So far, then, I had ascertained what form was called P . insignis and what P . shawi ; and with
the two collections of twenty male Pheasants I could roughly set aside sixteen which would be called by
Mr. Elliot Phasianus insignis, and four which I presume he would have àcceptéd as P . shawi. The next
point was to put down in words what the distinctions between the two sets really were. To take
Mr. Elliot’s descriptions first, T found that what he said would apply generally to birds in both series ; and,
indeed, I could only fix on six salient points :—
“ a. P . insignis more brilliant than P . shawi. Nothing could be made out o f this ; for in the twenty birds
not even three could be found exactly alike in this respect : some o f the specimens were most gorgeous ;
and the worst were never dull.
“ b. The tippings of the feathers of the back, scapulars, breast, and flanks green in P . insignis, blue in
P . shawi. A careful comparison o f the birds showed that this would not hold at all, some o f the latter series
having the tippings quite green, and many of the former series very blue.
“ c. Centre of abdomen and thighs in P . insignis black, in P . shawi brownish black. This also would not
hold ; some P . shawi had the abdomen black or greenish black, and one or two P . insignis brownish.