CALOPHASIS ELLIOTI .
Elliot’s Pheasant.
Phasiamts Ellioti, Swinhoe, P. Z. S. 1872, p . 550.
Calophasis Ellioti, Elliot, Monogr. Phasian. ii. pi. 13 bis (1873).
I f there has been one bird which has more than any other puzzled ornithologists lately, it is the remarkable
and beautiful species figured in the accompanying P la te ; and it must strike every one with surprise that so
showy a bird should have remained so long undiscovered. Still so it i s ; and it has been left to Mr.
Swinhoe, during his last trip to China, to discover and send to England fine skins of this abnormal Pheasant.
To say that it is a true Pheasant would be wrong; for although it exhibits the general form of a
Phasianus, its plumage partakes of the characters of several other members of the family, as has been
pointed but by Mr. Elliot in the account o f the species transcribed below. In fact the bird is ( if such a
thing were possible) a medley o f two or three forms together, which one could have imagined to have been
produced by their constant interbreeding. We must, however, regard it as a true species, and one of which
both Mr. Swinhoe and Mr. Elliot, who have done so much to increase our knowledge of the Pheasants, may
well be proud—the former as the describer of, and the latter in having his name attached to, so fine a bird.
I cannot do better than reproduce the account which Mr. Elliot has lately published in his Monograph;
and I do so the more willingly as the rarity of the last-mentioned work renders it probable that many of my
readers have uot had the opportunity o f perusing the original account.
“ This magnificent species, upon which Mr. Swinhoe has done me the honour o f bestowing my name, is
one of the most interesting, as it is also one of the most recent, novelties which that zealous and indefatigable
naturalist has made known to science. It is a native of the mountain-range that lies behind Ningpo, in the
Chinese province of Che-Kiang, where it represents, to a certain extent, such Pheasants as Phasianus
torqmtus, which inhabit the great tract lying between the hilly regions and the sea. On discovering this
beautiful bird my friend immediately notified me o f his good fortune, sending at the same time one of the
feathers from the back, by which I was enabled to perceive th at the species was entirely unknown in Europe.”
“ In his paper read lately before the Zoological Society of London, in which this and some other birds are
described, Mr. Swinhoe writes of this Pheasant as follows:—
“ ‘ From the mountainous region o f this province (Che-Kiang) I have procured a truly beauteous Pheasant,
perhaps the loveliest of that lovely group. It is smaller than P . torquatus, and has comparatively shorter
wings and longer ta if§ |T h e colouring o f its head and tail recall P . Reevesii, its coppery back and breast the
P . Scemmeringii of Japan, and the glowing maroon on its scapulars the Euplocamus Swinhoii of Formosa; but
its curiously marked lower back and its white-barred wing are suggested by no other species of this family
to my knowledge, and its white underparts no other true Pheasant possesses.”
“ ‘ Its mate is a smaller bird, and in coloration more of a Grouse than a Pheasant; but in her black underneck,
and in the marks o f her lateral rectrices, she shows her relationship to her lord. Possessed o f so
many striking characters, it would be easy to find an appropriate name for so marked a species; but on
glancing down the list of Pheasants I find that not one bears the name of Elliot; and it strikes me it would
be wrong to allow his magnificent work on the group to close without the figure of a bird dedicated to himself
: I therefore propose to name this firstfruits of my researches in this province Phasianus E llio ti.'"
“ Desiring, equally with myself, that this new species should be illustrated in this work, Mr. Swinhoe at
once forwarded to his agent in London the male and female, which he had with much difficulty been able to
procure; and soon after their arrival they came into my possession, in perfect condition, making a most
valuable addition to my collection of these beautiful birds.
“ Although Mr. Swinhoe has placed this species in the genus Phasianus .among the true Pheasants, I am
unable to agree with him (after carefully examining the specimens) in deeming that to be its correct position.
In many points it resembles the true Pheasants; but in many more this new form differs entirely from them.
The head of the male resembles somewhat those o f the true Pheasants, although I doubt if the naked skin
would ever expand into the large conspicuous wattles which form such a striking mode o f adornment in the
members of the genus Phasianus; while the bill is smaller, and the nostrils are only partially covered by a
scale. One of the most remarkable differences perceptible is in the structure and form of the feathers on
the lower p art of the rump. In all true Pheasants these are long, loose, split, and o f a hairy-like texture,
very dense, and they almost, if not entirely, conceal the upper tail-coverts. Now the present species exhibits