
 
		P R E F A C E .  
 THE  utility  of  this  undertaking  at  a crifis, when  the  tafte  for Botanical  purfuits  fo  univerfally  prevails,  
 willj  it  is  prefumed,  be  readily  admitted  by  all  thofe engaged  in  them,  whether  as  theorifts,  colleflors,  
 or  cultivators.  Such  a  work,  under  the  immediate  direftion  of  ferae  principal  leader  in  the  fcience,  
 of  this  country,  has  been  a  defideratum  of  long  expeftance;  but  either  from  the  great  expence  neceilarily  
 incurred,  before  any  adequate  return  could  be  made,  or  from  the  trouble  attendant  on  publications, 
  where  colouring  forms  fo coniiderable  a  part,  as  yet,  every  fimilar  attempt  has proved  abortive.  
 The  Bot. Mag.  of  Mr.  Curtis,  a  work  of  lingular  merit  in  its  way,  has  occaiionally  furniflred,  it  is  
 true,  a  few  fpecimens  of  new  plants;  but  the  greateft  part,  as  its  title-page  indicates,  confifts of  thofe  
 well  known,  common  plants,  long  cultivated  in  our  gardens;  the  direft  reverfe  of  the  propofals  and  
 intentions  of  the  author,  in  the  profecution  of  this.  From  a  wifli  to  prevent  confufion,  it  was  a  
 determined  principle  at  the  outlet  of  the  work,  not  to  give  any  generic  or  fpecific fynonims;  but  to  
 follow  the  moil  generally  accepted  names,  of  known  and  named  plants,  without  a  cavil,  of  our  beft  
 Engliih  botanitts,  or  cultivators,  if  no  flagrant  error  was  perceptible,  according  to  the  Linnaean  fyftem: 
   being  fatisfied,  nothing  contributed  fo  much  to  reprefs  the  ardour  of  young  botanifts  as  the  
 difficulty of  affixing  the  right  name  to  thofe  plants,  which,  (from  a  captious  defire  in  every  publiiher,  
 to  foift in  fomething  of  his  own  coinage,  upon  the  moll  trifling  fuppofed  diiierence,)  have  undergone  
 feveral  changes  of  title.  If  the  plant  was  a  certain  novelty,  with  us,  to  have  followed  the  fexual  
 fyftem,  without  a  fchifm;  upon  that  truly  grand  and  comprehenfive  fcale  of  nature;  when  the  
 formation  of  a  new  genus  was  necelTary;  if  not,  to  refer  it  to  fome  one  already  made,  if  fuch  was  
 to  be  found,  in  any  orthodox  author:  the  fpecific name  to  be  formed  from  fome  oppofed,  leading  
 feature,  in  the  habits  of  the  different  fpecies  of  the  genus.  But  although  fuch  were  the  Author's  
 intentions,  when  he  entered  on  this  bufmefs,  yet,  from  a  wifh  to  oblige  many  of  the  fupporters  of  
 the  work,  who  have  fignified  a  wifh  that  fynonims  fliould  be  given,  an  alphabetical  Index,  with  
 all  the  various  Synonims  collated  from  the  beft  authorities,  lhall  be  printed  feparate  for  the  ufe  of  
 thofe  who  may  wifh  for  fuch  an  addition.  
 As  a  fair  excufe  for  the  Author,  (who  throws  himfelf  upon  the  candour  of  the  Public,)  in  extenuation  
 of  the  inaccuracies  which  have,  and  will  neceffarily  occur  in  the  profecution  of  the  work,  
 it  is jull  to  fay,  that  tlie  difficulties  to  be  encountered,  and  of  which  none  but  thofe  engaged  in  
 fimilar  concerns  can  form  any  adequate  idea,  are  incalculable;  arifing  chiefly  from  the  nature  of  a  
 monthly  publication,  compofed  entirely  of  novelty,  which  cannot  be  anticipated,  and  of  courfe,  fo  
 very  little  time  can  be  allotted  for  revifal  or  correftion.  To  remedy  as  far  as  polfible  fuch  flips,  a  lift  
 of  Erratae  will  be  given,  with  the  Index,  at  the  clofe  of  each  volume.  
 K N I G H T S B H I D G E ,  06t .  1799.