
 
        
         
		I 3 S  BR I T I S H  BLOOD-SUCKIXG  FLIES  
 C.  pallidicornis  Kieffer  
 (Fig.  56,  a~d)  
 CuUcoidespallidicornis  Kieffer,  1919,  Ann.  .Mus.  Xat.  Hung.,  17,  46.  
 C.  distictus  Kieffer,  1916,  Arch.  Hydrobiol.  Supp.,  2,  492.  
 C.  dilciicus  Kieffer,  1921,  Bull,  Soc.  Hist.  Xat.  Moselle,  29,  55,  
 C.  subfascipennis  Goetghebuer,  in  part  {nec  Kieffer).  
 Tergite  with  the  processes  broader  than  in  C.  fascipennis,  more  or  less  
 triangular  instead  of  finger-like,  so  that  the  whole  distal  margin  of  the  tergite  
 tends  to  appear  bifid.  Remaining  parts  much  as  in  C. fascipennis,  but  parameres  
 somewhat  narrower,  especially  towards  the  tips.  
 The  specimens  examined  exhibit  some  variation  in  hypopvgial  structure,  
 though  all  are  quite  similar  externally.  In  a  cotype  of  C.  pallidicornis  in  thé  
 British  Museum  (fig.  56,  b)  the  parameres  are  definitely  shorter  than  in  six  
 British  males  (from  different  localities^  of  which  mounts  were  made  ;  some  of  
 the  latter  agree  with  the  cotype  in  the  shape  of  the  tergite  (fig.  56,  but  one  
 or  two  show  an  approach  to  the  form  of  ¿7.  fascipennis  (fig.  56,  c).  If  the  
 British  form  is  distinct  from  C.  pallidicornis  it  may  be  C.  dileucus  Kieif.  A  
 specimen  received  from  Dr.  Goetghebuer  as  C.  subfascipenms  Kieff.  was  identical  
 examples  ;  I  do  not  think  this  determination  can  be  correct  as  
 Kieffer  described  C.  siibfascipennis  from  a  female  with  striped  thorax.  
 C.  odiatus  Austen  
 (Fig.  56,  h)  
 Culicoides  odiatus  Austen,  1921,  Bull.  Ent.  Res.,  12.  112.  
 ?  C. pallidicor?iis  Kieffer  var.  hruneoscutellatus  Géza  Zilahi,  1934,  Bull.  Soc.  Ent.  Bulg.  8,  155.  
 This  was  described  from  two  females  from  Palestine,  and  no  male  has  since  
 been  obtained  in  that  country.  A  single  British  male  which  I  refer  doubtfully  
 to  this  species  has  a  hypopygium  very  much  as  in  C.  pallidicornis,  but  with  
 some  differences  which  may  be  significant,  the  most  notable  of  which  is  that  
 the  style  is  swollen  and  hairy  on  much  more  than  the  basal  half.  
 C.  tentorius  Austen  
 (Fig.  56,  g)  
 Cidicoides  tentorius  Xmttn,  1921,  Bull.  Ent.  Res.,  12,  no.  
 Hypopygium  very  like  that  of  C.  pallidicornis,  but  differing  definitely  in  
 the  long,  slender  ventral  root  of  the  coxite,  and  in  having  the  parameres  more  
 abruptly  narrowed  at  the  tips.  The  structure  is  almost  exactly  like  that  
 figured  by  Root  and  Hoffman  for  C.  biguttatus  Coq.,  except  that  the  American  
 species  is  shown  as  having  the  sternal  membrane  much  more  densely  spicular.  
 C.  te7itorius  has  been  recorded  only  from  Palestine.  Externally  the  male  is  
 very  similar  to  C.  pallidicornis,  having  scantily  haired  wings  as  in  that  species,  
 with  no  hairs  in  the  cubital  fork.  The  female  seems  rather  well  distinguished  
 from  C.  pallidicor7tis  by  the  more  distinct  white  spots  on  the  wing,  and  by  the  
 paler  (uniformly  light  reddish-brown)  thorax.  
 G E N I T A L I A  OF  CULICOIDES  139  
 C.  cubitalis  sp.  n.  (p.  40)  
 (Fig.  57,  i.  d)  
 Culicoides  subfasciipennis  var.  analis,  Kieffer,  1925,  Faune  de  France,  Ceratopogoninae,  81.  
 Tergite  with  the  processes  rather  thick  but  rather  long  and  divergent,  
 margin  of  tergite  between  them  nearly  straight,  with  small  median  notch.  
 Sternite  with  the  usual  wide  emargination,  membrane  bare.  Coxite  with  
 ventral  root  rather  long,  simple.  Style  nearly  straight,  slightly  enlarged  at  tip.  
 Aedeagus  broad,  antero-ventral  margin  well  defined.  Parameres  long,  with  
 foot-shaped  bases  and  hair-like  curled  tips.  
 In  the  form  of  the  tergite  and  parameres  and  the  bare  sternal  membrane  
 the  hypopygium  of  this  species  differs  widely  from  those  of  the  C.  fascipennis  
 FIG.  57.—Hj-popygia  of  Culicoides,  ventral  view  :  a,  b,  truncorum  (a,  Snailwell;  b,  Brockenhurst)  
 c,  d. cubitalis  (c,  Letchworth  ;  d, Arran);  e,  neglectus ?  (Belgium).  
 group,  but  it  shows  rather  a  close  resemblance  to  C.  odibilis,  a  species  to  which  
 it  bears  little  resemblance  in  coloration.  The  American  C.  simulans  Root  and  
 Hoffman  is  also  similar  in  hypopygial  structure,  and  intermediate  in  wingmarkings  
 between  C.  cubitalis  and  C.  odibilis.  
 Kieffer's  description  of  a^talis  agrees,  so  far  as  it  goes,  with  our  material,  
 but  I  do  not  think  analis  can  be  a  variety  of  subfascipennis,  the  original  
 description  of  which  indicates  a  very  different  insect  with  striped  thorax.  
 The  name  analis  is  preoccupied  in  Culicoides  by  C.  a7ialis  Santos  Abreu,  1921.  
 C.  truncorum  sp.  n.  (p.  41)  
 (Fig.  57,  a,  b)  
 Tergite  broadly  truncate  apically,  processes  short  and  almost  parallel,  
 median  notch  slight.  Sternite  with  moderate  emargination,  membrane  bare'.  
 Coxite  rather  long  and  narrow  ;  ventral  root  foot-shaped,  but  the  "  heel  "  not  
 very  prominent.  Style  somewhat  curved  at  tip,  which  is  not  swollen.  Aedeagus  
 with  very  slender  arch  and  narrow  apex,  ventral  surface  not  sclerotised.  
 Parameres  long  and  slender,  without  sharp  bend  near  base,  the  bent  tips  long  
 and  slender  and  provided  with  several  fine  barbs.  
 The  hypopygium  of  this  species  bears  some  resemblance  to  that  of  C.  
 albicans,  but  is  quite  different  from  any  species  of  the  C.  fascipennis  group.