[ w ]
E R R A T A .
p. j3} Referencei fo r Appendix I. N° I. read N° II.
fo r Appendix I. N° II. read N° III.
3 0 , Rogii read Kogii.
46 ,for Rikfa read Kifka.
06, for Korovin read Korelin.
186, Note—-for Tobob read Tobol.
154, Note_Line 2, after handpauken omitted von verfchiedenen Klang.
119,fo r Saktunk read Saktunak.
134, Line 6,for were read was.
188, 1.16. fo r preteftion read protection.
I 190,1. 5. fo r nor read not.
J9$>for Sungur read Sirgut.
225,1. 13. other has an.
226, fo r harlbadeers read halberdiers.
234, Note— line 3, dele See hereafter, p. 242.
246, fo r Marym read Narym.
256, Note—fo r called by Linnaeus Lutra Marina read Lutra Marina* called by
Linnaeus Muftela Lutris, &c.
237, Line 5,fo r made of the bone, &c. read made of bone, or the italk, &c.
278, Note 2— line 2, fo r Corbus read Corvus.
324, Note— line 4, dele was.
313, Note— line 3, dele that.
Ibid. Note— line to, “ I {hould not” Uc. is a feparate note, and relates to the
extraCl in the text loginning “ In 1648,” he.
t *v 3
a d v e r t i s e m e n t .
A S no aftronomical obfervations have been taken in
the voyages related in this colledtion, the longitude
and latitude aferibed to the new-difeovered illands in the
journals and upon the charts cannot be abfolutely depended
upon. Indeed the reader will perceive, that the
pofition '*• of the Fox Iflands upon the general map of
Ruffia is materially different from that affigned to them
upon the chart of Krenitzin and Levalheff. Without
endeavouring to clear up any difficulties which may
arife from this uncertainty, I thought it would be molt
fatisfaeftory to have the belt charts engraved : the reader
will then be able to compare them with each other, and
with the feveral journals. Which reprefentation of the
new-difeovered illands deferves the preferance, will probably
be afeertained upon the return of captain Clerke
from his prefent expedition.
■ * See p. 286,