
 
        
         
		JSTA.SXTERISTA.  K E X E N S X S ,  Satra/L. 
 NASITERNA  KEIENSIS,   Salvad. 
 Ke-Island  Pygmy  Parrot. 
 Nasiterna keiensis, Salvad. Ann. Mus.  Civic.  Genov,  vii.  p.  984  (1876),  x.  p.  26.  sp.  10  (1877). 
 ?Nasiterna pygmcea  (pt.), Schl.  N. T. D. iii.  p.  331  (1866,  spec,  from  Aru  Islands).—Rosenb.  (nec  Q. & G.),  
 Reis  naar  zuidostereil. pp. 48, 49  (1867, Aru).—Schl. N. T.  D.  iv.  pp. 6, 7  (pt.,  1871).—Id. Mus.  P.-  
 B.  Psittaci, Revue, p.  71  (pt.,  1874). 
 ?Nasiterna aruensis,  Salvad. Ann. Mus.  Civic.  Genov,  vii.  p.  985  (1875,  ex Schlegel), x. p.  25, note  2  (1877). 
 I  h a v e   reproduced  exactly  the  synonymy which  my  friend  Count  Salvadori  has  sent  to me,  as  it  explains  
 so  thoroughly  the  history o f  the species,  and  makes  clear  the  following  note with which  he  has  favoured  
 u ie :— “  T he Ke-Island  Pygmy  P a rro t is very like  the  female o f N. pygmcea;  but  it is larger,  has  the  pileum  
 more  conspicuously  ochraceous  yellow,  and  the  underparts  more  greenish,  and  without  the  yellow  tint.  
 Male  and  female  scarcely differ.  Total  length  3 '9 -3 -6  inches,  culmen  4-5,  wing 2-2-2*6,  tail  1-2—1-1. 
 “  Besides  the  three  typical  specimens,  two males  and  a   female,  collected  by Beccari  on  the Ke  Islands  
 and  described  by me,  I  have  seen  in  the  Leiden Museum  two  examples  from  the Aru  Islands,  collected  by  
 Von  Rosenberg,  which  have  been  spoken  o f by Professor  Schlegel.  They  are  in  rather  bad  condition ;  and  
 although  they seem  to  resemble  the  birds from  the Ke  Islands,  with which  I  have  compared  them,  I  am  not  
 quite  sure  th at  they  really  belong  to  the  same  species.” 
 Count  Salvadori  left with  me  for  the  purpose  o f  this work  a  fine male  and  female;  and as  these appear  
 to  be  fully  adult,  we  may  conclude  th at  the  species  has  none  o f  the  richer  colour  on  the  breast  as  in  
 N. pygmcea,  from which  it  also  differs  in  the more  conspicuous  spotting  o f  the  shoulder.  I  have  no  doubt  
 as  to  the  specific  value  o f N .  keiensis. 
 T he  following description  is  drawn  up from  the  typical  specimens:— 
 Crown  dirty yellow,  forming  a  well-defined  c a p ;  face  suffused with  brown,  which  gradually  blends  into  
 green  on  the  ch eek s;  all  the  upper  and  under surface green,  the  back  being  o f a  deeper  hue  than  the  lower  
 p a r ts ;  on  the chest o f the male  in  certain  lights  is  a   very delicate  wash  o f blue.  Primaries  blackish  brown,  
 each  feather  slightly margined  with  g r e e n ;  secondaries  and,  especially,  the  feathers  o f  the  shoulder  conspicuously  
 spotted with  b lack ;  two  centre  tail-feathers  blue  on  the  upper surface,  with  the shaft  black,  the  
 four  or  five  outer  feathers  on  each  side with  the  usual  spot  o f  yellow  on  the tips  o f  their  inner webs;  the  
 spines  o f  the  centre feathers  very  fine,  but  little  prolonged,  and  without  the spot  o f  black  found  in  some  of  
 the sp ecies;  under  tail-coverts  yellow,  stained with  green. 
 The  figures  in  the  Plate  are  taken  from  the  type  specimens,  and  are  o f the  natural  size.  It will  be  seen  
 th at  the  sexes  are alike-in  colour.