
 
		3TJTE1 ES  JS.UBSOTOTAXUS 
 PSITTEUTELES  RUBRONOTATUS. 
 Red-backed  Lorikeet. 
 Coriphilus rubronotatus, Wallace, P. Z. S.  1862, p.  166. 
 Charmosyna rubronotata, Wallace,  P. Z. S.  1864, p.  293. 
 Trichoglossus rubronotatus,  Finsch,  Pap.  ii.  p.  876  (1868). 
 Nano des rubronotatus,  Schlegel, Mus. P.-B. Revue  Psitt. p.  51  (1874). 
 Trichoglossus rubronotatus, Meyer, Sitzb. d. k.-k. Akad.  d. W.  zu Wien,  lxix. p.  400  (1874).  
 Trichoglossus kordoanus, Meyer, Verh.  d.  k.-k.  zool.-bot.  Ges.  zu Wien,  1874. 
 Charmosyna  kordoana, Salvadori, Ann. Mus.  Civ.  di Genova, vii.  1875,  p.  212. 
 D r.  Meyer,  ever  anxious  to  advance Papuan  ornithology,  has  obligingly  forwarded  to  me  seven  specimens  
 o f a  little Lorikeet, which  he  considers  to  be  two  different  birds  ;  and  he  believes  that  his  Trichoglossus  
 kordoanus should stand  as  a  species, and  not as a  synonym to Mr. W allace’s Coriphilus rubronotatus.  But, after  
 having given  the subject my  closest attention  and,  moreover,  after  consulting  the  opinions  o f others,  I  can  
 come  to  no  other conclusion  than  that  the  specimens  sent  to me  are  identical  or  have  insufficient characters  
 to  separate  them.  Trifling differences, it is true,  occur among  the  seven  specimens ;  hut  they are not more,  
 nay, not even so  much  as those that have occurred to me many times  before—differences attributable,  perhaps,  
 to  locality o r to  some  cause  equally  unimportant.  As Dr. Meyer, however, still  clings to his opinion and has,  
 moreover, taken  the  trouble  to forward me  a  translation  o f his  paper on  the subject with additional  remarks,  
 it  is right th at  I  should give his views  on  the  subject. 
 He  rem a rk s:— “  Trichoglossus rubronotatus was  discovered  by Mr. Wallace  on  the island  o f Salwati  at  the  
 north-west  extremity  o f New Guinea,  and  has  since  been  procured  by Dr.  Bernstein  in  the  same  district,  
 hut was never  figured  before,  specimens  even  now  being  very  rare.  I t was only in one place in N ew Guinea,  
 in  May  1873,  th at I  obtained  this lovely  bird,  viz.  near Rubi,  the  southern  point o f the g reat Geelvinks B a v ;  
 and  in  1874  I  published  some  notes  respecting  it,  which  I  beg  to  be  allowed  to  reproduce here. 
 “ D r.  Finsch  says  o f rubronotatus:—‘ A  beautiful  bird,  representing  the  Trichoglossus placens on  Salwati  
 and  the  north-west  coast o f New Guinea;’  but, inasmuch as the  two  species  occur  together (mine were  both  
 obtained  near Rubi),  they must  rath er  he considered  parallel  forms  and  not  representations  o f  each  other,  
 the  adult male  only  being  known  till  lately,  and  described  by  Dr.  Finsch  in  detail,  although  he  does  not  
 mention  the  sex  o f the  bird. 
 “  A short  time  before  I  published  these  notes  I  had  described  a  similar  form  from  the  island  o f Mysore,  
 in  the north  o f  the  Geelvinks Bay,  under  the  name  o f  Trichoglossus  kordoanus,  a  female,  and  the  only one  
 th at  had  come  under my  notice.  I  then  stated  the  differences  between  the females  o f the two  forms  to  be  
 as follows :— T .  kordoanus.  Cheeks  and  sides  o f the  neck  bright  bluish  green,  whereas  in  T.  rubronotatus  
 the  cheeks are  o f a   darker  tint,  with  yellow  stripes,  and  the  sides  o f the  neck  light  grass-green,  like  the  
 under surface  o f the  whole  b o d y ;  besides which  the  red  o f  the  uropygium  in  T .  kordoanus  is  much  more  
 vivid  than  the  same  colour  in  the males  o f  T .  rubronotatus.  The  irides  are  bright  yellow;  bill  aud  cere  
 bright  r e d ;  feet  o f a  somewhat  lighter  t in t ;  claws  grey.  The  tongue  is  a  regular  brush  ;  the  stomach  
 contained  only  flower-sap. 
 “  I  imagined  th at  the males would  prove  to  be  still more  distinct,  as  the  difference  between  the  females  
 was  so marked ;  this,  however,  did not prove  to  be  the  case.  T h e  Dresden Museum  possesses a  male  s.pe-  
 cimen  o f the Mysore  b ird ;  the  chief points  o f difference  between  this  and  T.  rubronotatus are as  follows :—   
 Under  surface,  especially on  throat,  bluish  green  instead  o f the  yellowish  tint  in  T.  rubronotatus;  the red  of  
 the  uropygium  brighter  and more  extensive  than  in  the  New-Guinea  bird, where  it  only  consists  o f  a  few  
 feathers  even  in  the male when  in  full  plumage;  besides which  the  red  on  the  sides  o f the  breast appears to  
 extend more  to  the  centre  in  T .  kordoanus  than  in  T.  rubronotatus;  and,  finally,  the green  of  the  upper surface  
 o f the former  is  o f a more  brilliant  hue  than  in  the  latter. 
 “  These  differences  are not g reat,  yet  they are  conspicuous  and cannot be overlooked o r underrated ;  their  
 real  significance,  however,  lies  in  the fact  th at  they  coincide  with  the  geographical separation,  and  in  their  
 constancy.  In our D arwinian days but few naturalists will  dispute  that  insular  forms  are to be regarded  as  directly  
 derived  from  continent  ones,  nor  will  the value of the small differences he disputed.  W hen  sufficient  
 materials  o f similar deviations  from  a  parent  stock  are  collected,  the  reasons  o f these  variations may,  perhaps, 
   be  rendered more  clear,  and  the laws  by which  they sometimes  take  place  be more  fully  recognized.” 
 The  principal  figures  are  o f the  size  o f life.