
 
        
         
		the  brain.  This  operation, whïphf appears  tolhave. been  alm est < 'jirtaiêMï #  ' jk  actised&at  
 Thebes, was  eeïûparativdy'ùn^®al  at Memphis-;* for  ead*  from  the 
 latter  necropolis,  five  only iïrfe  peiSffraled';  Trifl&laMB the  fifty-five 7L’hel>an  crania,  a lie are  
 perforated but two;  a'nd-m'a .thiràjthe eth|^®^ÇjSo Itflé .broken  thatfiBej, brain conf e M   
 have been removed  through^tlblQïifice 1  ffîm^oe&ÿ^detnct  threoî iifttanc'e^pfeemijlote  
 perforation of the nose?)in whidMaie - b rain had been! extracted -•t'bfiffih the,  ffiairnum, 
  by cutting the neck half across beh.jn.dl;  the  bandâgopbeiiig'foided^oveHtheimaiMoii  
 The absence of the ethmoidal  peiroraïiohin the ol3e^*oUwsrtTOmi\lemphis;>an?»])ri rrihnv  
 others of  a later date from  the  same lfficrapoli*,, leads mb" to ‘su^p.os^thaKne ‘brain may  
 have been primitivelÿrÿemovedt’thro'ugh'-^he'-foràüîeîôrhïâgTîum;  and  -that?*its  extraction  
 through’ 'th9rfflsif|as‘i already suggested, may'ha^S^èfeêH^subsequeh^fefÉfeteén-^of the  
 embalming  art.  Again, vthé'different  provinces^ of Egypt  may  lfavêtJSâf(]i!pec’tilfâr8^.l  
 conventional  details in  this as in other usages;  for all the1 heads' from-1 ’© rfîhos and-dM'a'afi*  
 dehnhaYeithe ethmoidal ojffenin1g;^li2those:from’iAbydo,sfffi:d®®eb0d*,a're without it;  
 óf.the  four from  Philæ,  oneis-peffeatlà^ndsfcee are trot."''  ' 
 * ;©enôh,f dong'ago ‘pointed 'out ai.peculiaritycof: the*:EgÿptiaiètÿEbSl^«^ seen i|® S |||l|!   
 markable  distance., between  the  nostrils ‘atfdHthe^teeth.  • T-his'nfetthrefift1lh.4a|£small  
 receding chinois of frequent!occurrence bothimthe mummies anfifeir thè^m’ohuSOTllitt?; 
 Position b f the Ear.—Everytbne who'bas paid the4east”attentiô1i^t^JEgyptrafi  
 observedtbe elevatëd-positiqn which is given to the ear;  and I havewjpnratwrriyVritire  
 series  of  heads,- in'order  to  ascertain whether this  peculiarity has a n y   
 ture;  but I  cap-find nothing  in them to confirm  it.  - J Ih e  bohy^trM^piptesents' nMifevial  
 tion -from the usual-fèlative arrangement bf parts;  but the  car1ilagmbl^4Kù‘ctfire  bcihg  
 desiccated,  and consequently Contracted, may not afford sal isfac 
 and  other  authors  have  remarked an .elevation  of  the  ear in som^e^îr)doruWÇ!wfif^*-,ffn(d  
 the  traveller  Rawr,  quoted  by Virey, notices  the  same" feature in-thê  llif^od^audj'iït is  
 said-.alib  to  exist  ini de^fee  in 1 the'4ewâ.u">Thefe^rftay,s'*®!ëÿ^m*S^ï^b^ôî?ï^|ffinnwOt>i,on  
 lo t this peculiarity* of ' Egyptian sculpture  and paintingt^Mt .‘^^^^6ffifiden*tifl^^^®[t  
 tin». it  is  nothing  more  than  an upward  elongation of  the atnicular-cqiTtdcïgc^'Vi^lîâufr  
 anylm^ii^kWiöfolle^iioiiy^meatiK.  It bas also occurred totm^thatëHKè appearaifóè-^  
 question [may be Sometimes owing to the remarkable vertical  lengths dfC*fewpper  jaw£mt  
 some heads (those represented  Plate  IY., Fig.  2,  and  Plate V., Fü^^^m^emnï^lefl^in  
 which  it  is  manifest  that thê eaf would possess a remarkable  elevation intfesiÆ^l^lo'thii1  
 maxillary holies',-without  being  anyV néfîrer* 'to- the  top of the head  flianf Thsifal**Jd^c^o’  
 hints may possibly afford some clew to a satisfactory explanation of  a,n almost i »variable  
 rulé'bf Egyptian art. 
 Dr. Prichard  (Researches Vól. TL, p. 251,) has given an abstract _of  son!e s_oüsébyÉtions  
 made by M. De  La Malle, on the mummies  contained  in'the  Museum' of- Turin.  *%Ih  
 the  skulls of. these  [six] mummies,  as well  as  in ’many otheis’ Bfbught’ from  the  same  
 country,  although  the  facial  angle was  not  different  from  that of  European  hea'ds,  the  
 meatus auditorius, instead  of being situated: in the same plane with the basis of the nose,  
 was found by M. De Malle to be exactly on a level with the centre of-tbe eye’.’L  Unless  
 M. De Malle is an  anatomist,  and  accustomed to comparisons of this kind, PcSn  imagine 
 iPlî  whi'©1t*the heed was placed for inspection1,! 
   fotiffS^nfo^flrep'cmi’ih'Amt'^^lti^iivvanlf ithe higber wffl® be  the relative position  
 'dfttli(fl(‘^^u^iti'])ïi^fe^ft’jtn»Oif^hfJbrrf:*l®Be|(fe|îeiî wMM the nostrilse# the ©ye, a t option.  
 »1*a ' r u f t t l i b ^ n o i c£fttbtL,!bécaus@-W©(are;Stbld' that in the mummies  
 »™qn(WieTffl|*‘®m facial  à11 from tBi^dffEh-ftJpean-' heads.”  I  need  
 b n3®îRciiiiiat.lv'  Ins  &lbtüâô<,'eaïj  the less will  be 
 Üi|&#cia’l  i^a®H§' inaidiest [jfe contrad ict  each 
 Iri-lho  iranpSfti'k$K^ ^>H|8 ^ t - f i j i ? ! & afeeurate delineations of mummied  
 li’e  'vain for thê hll'&gM«..pô(Mliarif!yî bf the' Egÿp- 
 -ffish ear.  i f f M lÉfeikifticffifad  Negroid  forms: 
 aiindtuijJ^1^^^[oyig?!S|^ifi>iffii*r^ j ^ ‘gi^'>raMpl‘).i^Pi^Sj|ggaIi]^ëfonÿ1>he'people of all nations,  
 VQ^cPllC^' hs,  a nd  of eve ry  cond i tion  in 1 ife.  See ' PI ate XIV. : - 
 y  -per naps-yfesa^CBUcl n si ve  than, on  most  
 QtKrp~^^msÀ1)^iJifv^irl^F3<\Aq)t*ia»jfctjtKt)(t!giii..^i1) vM|fe^e1^iHeàoj.wl  may.seem, w$y$pnri&t 
 pass  it by without a few  remarks. 
 iaU!e'Lo‘dotu'*Yi.iu  Ilitu p i-v 'utery I14. \dSffijit c e  ah ?>  thfÿfEgvjptians 
 as^ifi. îtj^'ôre-blacky ^êiit*hi*4^^^âi™ÆM^fMteiéf(a*ii(!l|[nV)J  am abttfjJSj idkterm.  This  rfe-  
 ma-rk a p p l i e s . lilad»  tlougs^wp® are  in my-  
 ftolQgicalfiânguage^i%ïfiaveilhçvî‘fi^JJ^MgBi|^sM&>tgJ)hhheil|M ]eat3lt@^pf,thein.}vfhe  
 Â^^ofiÿDelphK  Herëjsi *i!q(;jfi 
 t«luÿ|^nji^t baye- . f e p i o M * u , k I V l a u i i i c e ;   
 T llrelej? ^  Wi 1  1 Ak )»  omL evcgi 
 the  country  itself;  whence the name  Epyo^nwtos—the  blac k  country  of Hermes.  
 ^pAir.ai.ii^ii^'n'.f&rôoeçÿtqiith'e  hta) emo tiJÈ*Mj^^^™^^m^j^p^f^^ess-g];re§|%i'perbapSî  
 too 1 ilL 'dM jpM m f tty irm a  b e ; x v u l l h i o S ■  enôtÈerf e^,(^witness;  that  
 qS, Btwle&a«ite^ji»dnffluMmlis>behi \,t dvtq^ra(^l)f£3W)ytii,/rLJEi^vpt1ii.4|®%^^jg|u  
 the  second  century of  our era,  and his  observations  must  consequently have  been  made  
 some thin g |^ p  f.eîitb ai 1$ )i  i if »1.1 etoÜ(-)M,*jT| J[js .words- axeias 
 tolLov\7^S’i n  coi re'-poiuliri’gw***ij11 umtJiJsSc'hii aur sidüyo 11u*-ft*is-, tog* saji|gllajer  
 pje^trj^4#ofi,<l|a|Lee’j%;rqen  li lw  notAtlie^^^^dlÆMÎyi^ifui^^Huya 1 e-111 eré^depiiants'anïE  
 SËJSiJî^qïP'eyfç  But anil M ei^o.udfM%fe thaiBLl he  'noi,t*l  ar&j 
 tfrnfc,  (^p,< ij$rby%ai ‘j&f*//?  aV. tho^rj  for'-exam pie,  \\lici® htlmbi^  the  tlmh  ^bh.enu 
 (a-^sf uahs^ \ 'ffdÿ^tHl 1 a  i n*ïNu biaf), ab()\e^SAfeirofeRfill ^CiS'6li^ \o.ifi-nirv arouudi.-Meroe they  
 aretôlŸiâSfy ^liffi^mïly b l a c k ^ , A z / ^ i   !t" 
 Here is  âijTOle&c^idüncëttolbjbÿi that the;natural 1  iTahtUoMllon of  the Negroes 
 wasithe samerèeKenfôet» ceùtu-rii's- sinoeiasfeitt  a»r^S5^gai>e«milooedonl .to-Herqdottts, 
   tjîef mon urn e'n fe%r pv^friFebty;  5 ^■'  suBjec^ T® dbWd;" therefore,  
 much" iiîbfq readd-y bFlJw^ h a tum - luVtoi irga  bèeni  in Eg\(pi^^mnpttlîft,û*àdmit 
 the literal and unquabufioihinteTpretalipinof*hi4\Ç'i|l” 'ttInch hahjbeeti insi^teffioh>by some,  
 and which wrmlraf'felïï^ tK'cs-Egyptians wiffi*  " * ' 
 * Ptolemæi Geo'g.  ISb. 
 ^ H D id   â®ÿ obe1 ever  read" the E uterpe  ^ p f lié   -Itst  ti^^^ph^Q^^®fe^'inisgivin gs - op this kind“!  I ask this question  
 with a  profound respect for  the  venerable historian  and  traveller*